Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Suthikulpanit, Suravee
ab3d527329 device property: ACPI: Remove unused DMA APIs
These DMA APIs are replaced with the newer versions, which return
the enum dev_dma_attr. So, we can safely remove them.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-07 01:29:22 +01:00
Suthikulpanit, Suravee
e5e558644b device property: Adding DMA Attribute APIs for Generic Devices
The function device_dma_is_coherent() does not sufficiently
communicate device DMA attributes. Instead, this patch introduces
device_get_dma_attr(), which returns enum dev_dma_attr.
It replaces the acpi_check_dma(), which will be removed in
subsequent patch.

This also provides a convenient function, device_dma_supported(),
to check DMA support of the specified device.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-07 01:29:22 +01:00
Suthikulpanit, Suravee
1b9863c6aa device property: Introducing enum dev_dma_attr
A device could have one of the following DMA attributes:
    * DMA not supported
    * DMA non-coherent
    * DMA coherent

So, this patch introduces enum dev_dma_attribute. This will be used by
new APIs introduced in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-07 01:29:21 +01:00
Mika Westerberg
3f5c8d3187 device property: Add fwnode_property_match_string()
Sometimes it is useful to be able to extract an index of certain string
value from an array of strings. A typical use case is to give a name to a
DMA channel, PWM, clock and so on.

Provide an implementation using unified device property accessors that
follows of_property_match_string() but works for all supported fwnodes.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-25 02:00:19 +02:00
Jeremy Linton
4c96b7dc0d Add a matching set of device_ functions for determining mac/phy
OF has some helper functions for parsing MAC and PHY settings.
In cases where the platform is providing this information rather
than the device itself, there needs to be similar functions for ACPI.

These functions are slightly modified versions of the ones in
of_net which can use information provided via DT or ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-13 16:58:29 -07:00
Suthikulpanit, Suravee
05ca556003 device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.

This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
interface based on the booting architecture.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-06-15 14:40:49 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
16ba08d5c9 device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform data
Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties
to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used
by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT
nor ACPI) is present for the given device.

Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure.
An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null
entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct
property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct
device using device_add_property_set().  That will cause the
device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source
of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or
an ACPI companion device object associated with it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-03 23:23:51 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
ce793486e2 driver core / ACPI: Represent ACPI companions using fwnode_handle
Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to
ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to
struct acpi_device directly.

There are two benefits from that.  First, the somewhat ugly and
hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same
struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point
to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
2015-03-16 23:49:03 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
8a0662d9ed Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties
Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from
device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are
no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been
created yet or they do not exist at all).

The following functions are provided:

fwnode_property_present()
fwnode_property_read_u8()
fwnode_property_read_u16()
fwnode_property_read_u32()
fwnode_property_read_u64()
fwnode_property_read_string()
fwnode_property_read_u8_array()
fwnode_property_read_u16_array()
fwnode_property_read_u32_array()
fwnode_property_read_u64_array()
fwnode_property_read_string_array()

in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added
previously.  For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct
fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object
(depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be
obtained.

Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the
children of the device description object associated with a given
device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the
number of a given device's child nodes.

The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.

Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 21:58:23 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
b31384fa5d Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware
Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device
properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name
and the corresponding data type.  The purpose of it is to help to
write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform
firmware interface.

The following general helper functions are added:

device_property_present()
device_property_read_u8()
device_property_read_u16()
device_property_read_u32()
device_property_read_u64()
device_property_read_string()
device_property_read_u8_array()
device_property_read_u16_array()
device_property_read_u32_array()
device_property_read_u64_array()
device_property_read_string_array()

The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is
present.  The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of
various types to be retrieved in a uniform way.  The remaining 5 are
for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers
or strings).

The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.

This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 21:58:21 +01:00