Commit Graph

21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vineet Gupta
7082a29c22 ARC: use ACCESS_ONCE in cmpxchg loop
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2015-02-02 17:08:37 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
9fb92eb116 ARC: R-M-W assist locks only needed for !LLSC
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2014-12-12 16:02:34 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
619f30188f ARC: Allow SMP kernel to build/boot on UP-only infrastructure
In light of recent SNAFU with SMP build, allow simple platform to build
as SMP but run UP.

* Remove the dependence on simulation SMP extension to enable quick
  build/test iterations of SMP kernel.

* In absence of platform SMP registration, prevent the NULL smp feature
  name from borkign the system

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2014-09-27 14:49:01 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
c16e3e2283 ARC: prune extra header includes from smp.c
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2014-07-23 11:17:51 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
2b75c0f93e ARC: [SMP] unify cpu private IRQ requests (TIMER/IPI)
The current cpu-private IRQ registration is ugly as it requires need to
expose arch_unmask_irq() outside of intc code.
So switch to percpu IRQ APIs:
  -request_percpu_irq [boot core]
  -enable_percpu_irq  [all cores]

Encapsulated in helper arc_request_percpu_irq()

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2014-07-23 11:16:45 +05:30
Noam Camus
7e5122190b ARC: [SMP] Fix IPI IRQ registration
Handle it just like timer. Current request_percpu_irq() would fail on
non-boot cpus and thus IRQ will remian unmasked on those cpus.

[vgupta: fix changelong]
Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2014-06-26 11:58:25 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
2d4899f6bd ARC: arc_local_timer_setup() need not pass own cpu id
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2014-06-03 13:26:52 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
d8e8c7dda1 ARC: [SMP] optimize IPI send and receive
* Don't send an IPI if receiver already has a pending IPI.
  Atomically piggyback the new msg with pending msg.

* IPI receiver looping on xchg() not required

References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/232
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-12-23 12:05:04 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
f2a4aa5646 ARC: [SMP] simplify IPI code
* ipi_data is just a word, no need to keep it as struct

* find_next_bit() not needed to loop thru a 32bit word, ffs suffices
2013-12-23 12:05:04 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
53dc110c97 ARC: [SMP] cpu halt interface doesn't need "self" cpu-id
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-12-23 12:05:04 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
ccdaa6e0c8 ARC: [SMP] IPI ACK interface doesn't need "self" cpu-id
The interface is confusing, it feels like we are getting "sender" info,
whereas it is the "receiver", which can very well be retrived by
smp_processor_id(), if need be.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-12-23 12:05:04 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
ddf84433f4 ARC: [SMP] cpumask not needed in IPI send path
The current IPI sending callstack needlessly involves cpumask.

   arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu) / smp_send_reschedule(cpu)
      ipi_send_msg(cpumask_of(cpu))	--> [cpu to cpumask]
         plat_smp_ops.ipi_send(callmap)
            for_each_cpu(callmap)	--> [cpuask to cpu]
               do_plat_specific_ipi_PER_CPU

Given that current backends are not capable of 1:N IPIs, lets simplify
the interface for now, by keeping "a" cpu all along.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-12-23 12:05:04 +05:30
Jiang Liu
06b93c347c smp, ARC: kill SMP single function call interrupt
Commit 9a46ad6d6d "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function
call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-11-07 14:34:31 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
5ea72a9026 ARC: [SMP] TLB flush
- Add mm_cpumask setting (aggregating only, unlike some other arches)
  used to restrict the TLB flush cross-calling

- cross-calling versions of TLB flush routines (thanks to Noam)

Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-11-06 10:41:45 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
064a626924 ARC: use __weak instead of __attribute__((weak))
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-11-06 10:40:37 +05:30
Paul Gortmaker
ce7599567e arc: delete __cpuinit usage from all arc files
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.

This removes all the arch/arc uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files.  Currently arc does not have any __CPUINIT used in
assembly files.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
2013-06-27 14:37:58 +05:30
Thomas Gleixner
fa35e42a00 arc: Use generic idle loop
The generic idle loop implements all functionality. Aside of that it
allows arc to implement the tsk_is_polling() functionality correctly,
despite the patently (now gone) comment in the original arc cpu_idle()
function:
/* Since we SLEEP in idle loop, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can't be set */
See kernel/cpu/idle.c

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130321215233.711253792@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2013-04-08 17:39:23 +02:00
Vineet Gupta
10b1271875 ARC: [Review] Multi-platform image #7: SMP common code to use callbacks
This again is for switch from singleton platform SMP API to
multi-platform paradigm

Platform code is not yet setup to populate the callbacks, that happens
in next commit

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2013-02-15 23:16:16 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
877768c84d ARC: [Review] Multi-platform image #3: switch to board callback
-platform API is retired and instead callbacks are used

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2013-02-15 23:16:14 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
03a6d28cdd ARC: [Review] Multi-platform image #2: Board callback Infrastructure
The orig platform code orgnaization was singleton design pattern - only
one platform (and board thereof) would build at a time.

Thus any platform/board specific code (e.g. irq init, early init ...)
expected by ARC common code was exported as well defined set of APIs,
with only ONE instance building ever.

Now with multiple-platform build requirement, that design of code no
longer holds - multiple board specific calls need to build at the same
time - so ARC common code can't use the API approach, it needs a
callback based design where each board registers it's specific set of
functions, and at runtime, depending on board detection, the callbacks
are used from the registry.

This commit adds all the infrastructure, where board specific callbacks
are specified as a "maThine description".

All the hooks are placed in right spots, no board callbacks registered
yet (with MACHINE_STARt/END constructs) so the hooks will not run.

Next commit will actually convert the platform to this infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2013-02-15 23:16:13 +05:30
Vineet Gupta
41195d236e ARC: SMP support
ARC common code to enable a SMP system + ISS provided SMP extensions.

ARC700 natively lacks SMP support, hence some of the core features are
are only enabled if SoCs have the necessary h/w pixie-dust. This
includes:
-Inter Processor Interrupts (IPI)
-Cache coherency
-load-locked/store-conditional
...

The low level exception handling would be completely broken in SMP
because we don't have hardware assisted stack switching. Thus a fair bit
of this code is repurposing the MMU_SCRATCH reg for event handler
prologues to keep them re-entrant.

Many thanks to Rajeshwar Ranga for his initial "major" contributions to
SMP Port (back in 2008), and to Noam Camus and Gilad Ben-Yossef for help
with resurrecting that in 3.2 kernel (2012).

Note that this platform code is again singleton design pattern - so
multiple SMP platforms won't build at the moment - this deficiency is
addressed in subsequent patches within this series.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rajeshwar Ranga <rajeshwar.ranga@gmail.com>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
2013-02-15 23:16:02 +05:30