Medium term goal is to eliminate the i915->engine[] array and to get there
we have recently introduced equivalent array in intel_gt. Now we need to
migrate the code further towards this state.
This next step is to eliminate usage of i915->engines[] from the
for_each_engine_masked iterator.
For this to work we also need to use engine->id as index when populating
the gt->engine[] array and adjust the default engine set indexing to use
engine->legacy_idx instead of assuming gt->engines[] indexing.
v2:
* Populate gt->engine[] earlier.
* Check that we don't duplicate engine->legacy_idx
v3:
* Work around the initialization order issue between default_engines()
and intel_engines_driver_register() which sets engine->legacy_idx for
now. It will be fixed properly later.
v4:
* Merge with forgotten v2.5.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191017161852.8836-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Better explain the usage of the microcontroller and what i915 is
responsible of. While at it, fix the documentation for the auth
function, which doesn't do any pinning anymore.
v2: add a comment on HuC being optional and descrive how HuC accesses
memory (Martin)
v3: add extra newline for better text organization (Martin)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Anna Karas <anna.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014183602.3643-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Add a short description of what we expect from GuC and some minor
improvements to existing documentation. Also remove a comment about a
difference between GuC and HuC that is not true anymore.
v2: add that the GuC is not mandatory (Martin)
v3: add extra newline for better text organization (Martin)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Anna Karas <anna.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014183602.3643-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Now that i915_ggtt knows everything about its own paths to perform mmio,
we can use that as our primary backpointer for individual fence
registers. This reduces the amount of pointer dancing we have to perform
on the common paths, but more importantly finishes our fence register
encapsulation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191016143234.4075-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Now that we record the default "goldenstate" context, we do not need to
emit the mocs registers at the start of each context and can simply do
mmio before the first context and capture the registers as part of its
default image. As a consequence, this means that we repeat the mmio
after each engine reset, fixing up any platform and registers that were
zapped by the reset (for those platforms with global not context-saved
settings).
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111723
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111645
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191016090749.7092-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We perform timeslicing immediately upon receipt of a request that may be
put into the second ELSP slot. The idea behind this was that since we
didn't install the timer if the second ELSP slot was empty, we would not
have any idea of how long ELSP[0] had been running and so giving the
newcomer a chance on the GPU was fair. However, this causes us extra
busy work that we may be able to avoid if we wait a jiffie for the first
timeslice as normal.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191016100851.4979-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
To ensure correct state data for compute workloads, we
need to keep the ff dop clock enabled.
References: HSDES#1606700617
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015154449.10338-5-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
In order to ensure constant caches are invalidated
properly with a0, we need extra hdc flush after invalidation.
v2: use IS_TGL_REVID (Chris)
References: HSDES#1604544889
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015154449.10338-4-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Add hdc pipeline flush to ensure memory state is coherent
in L3 when we are done.
v2: Flush also in breadcrumbs (Chris)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015154449.10338-3-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Aim for completeness and invalidate also the ro parts
in l3 cache. This might allow to get rid of the preparser
disable/enable workaround on invalidation path.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015154449.10338-2-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
There is no significance to our delay before clearing the semaphore the
engine is waiting on, so release it as soon as we acknowledge the CS
update following our preemption request. This should allow the GPU to
resume work earlier, if it was stuck on the semaphore at the end of a
request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015093204.25693-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We rely on only the tasklet being allowed to call into process_csb(), so
assert that is locked when we do. As the tasklet uses a simple bitlock,
there is no strong lockdep checking so we must make do with a plain
assertion that the tasklet is running and assume that we are the
tasklet!
v2: Fixup intel_gt_sanitize() to prepare each engine for the reset so
that the locks are marked as held during the reset
v3: Check for existent function pointers for very early sanitisation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014121336.30137-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since commit e2144503bf ("drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from
overtaking each other on preemption") we have restricted requests to run
on their chosen engine across preemption events. We can take this
restriction into account to know that we will want to resubmit those
requests onto the same physical engine, and so can shortcircuit the
virtual engine selection process and keep the request on the same
engine during unwind.
References: e2144503bf ("drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from overtaking each other on preemption")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramlingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191013203012.25208-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We want the general purpose registers to be clear in all new contexts so
that we can be confident that no information is leaked from one to the
next.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014090757.32111-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check the logical ring context by asserting that the registers hold
expected start during execution. (It's a bit chicken-and-egg for how
could we manage to execute our request if the registers were not being
updated. Still, it's nice to verify that the HW is working as expected.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014090757.32111-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
NOA configuration take some amount of time to apply. That amount of
time depends on the size of the GT. There is no documented time for
this. For example, past experimentations with powergating
configuration changes seem to indicate a 60~70us delay. We go with
500us as default for now which should be over the required amount of
time (according to HW architects).
v2: Don't forget to save/restore registers used for the wait (Chris)
v3: Name used CS_GPR registers (Chris)
Fix compile issue due to rebase (Lionel)
v4: Fix save/restore helpers (Umesh)
v5: Move noa_wait from drm_i915_private to i915_perf_stream (Lionel)
v6: Add missing struct declarations in i915_perf.h
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191012072308.30312-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Here we introduce a mechanism by which the execbuf part of the i915
driver will be able to request that a batch buffer containing the
programming for a particular OA config be created.
We'll execute these OA configuration buffers right before executing a
set of userspace commands so that a particular user batchbuffer be
executed with a given OA configuration.
This mechanism essentially allows the userspace driver to go through
several OA configuration without having to open/close the i915/perf
stream.
v2: No need for locking on object OA config object creation (Chris)
Flush cpu mapping of OA config (Chris)
v3: Properly deal with the perf_metric lock (Chris/Lionel)
v4: Fix oa config unref/put when not found (Lionel)
v5: Allocate BOs for configurations on the stream instead of globally
(Lionel)
v6: Fix 64bit division (Chris)
v7: Store allocated config BOs into the stream (Lionel)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191012072308.30312-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Sometimes we want to emit a terminator request, a request that flushes
the pipeline and allows no request to come after it. This can be used
for a "preempt-to-idle" to ensure that upon processing the
context-switch to that request, all other active contexts have been
flushed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191012070136.32058-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We set out-of-bound parameters inside the i915_requests.flags field,
such as disabling preemption or marking the end-of-context. We should
not coalesce consecutive requests if they have differing instructions
as we only inspect the last active request in a context. Thus if we
allow a later request to be merged into the same execution context, it
will mask any of the earlier flags.
References: 2a98f4e65b ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191011190325.10979-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add the missing serialisation on the request for a write into a vma to
wait until that vma is bound before being executed by the GPU.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191011193620.14026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Only the requests that have not completed do we want to change the
status of to signal the -EIO when cancelling the inflight set of requests
upon wedging.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191011103345.26013-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Before we BUG out with bad pending state, leave a telltale as to which
test failed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191010071434.31195-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we have a wedged GPU that we need to recover, but fail, add a taint
for CI to pickup and schedule a reboot.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191002160034.5121-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
There are small differences between the blitter and the video engines in
the xcs context image (e.g. registers 0x200 and 0x204 only exist on the
blitter). Since we never explicitly set a value for those register and
given that we don't need to update the offsets in the lrc image when we
change engine within the class for virtual engine because the HW can
handle that, instead of having a separate define for the BCS we can
just restrict the programming to the part we're interested in, which is
common across the engines.
Bspec: 45584
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191009230424.6507-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The specs don't mention any specific HW limitation on the blitter and
manual inspection shows that the HW does set the relative MMIO bit in
the LRI of the blitter context image, so we can remove our limitations.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191009230424.6507-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The active/pending execlists is no longer protected by the
engine->active.lock, but is serialised by the tasklet instead. Update
the locking around the debug and stats to follow suit.
v2: local_bh_disable() to prevent recursing into the tasklet in case we
trigger a softirq (Tvrtko)
Fixes: df40306902 ("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191009160906.16195-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Now that we dropped the engine->active.lock serialisation from around
process_csb(), direct submission can run concurrently to the interrupt
handler. As such execlists->active may be advanced as we dequeue,
dropping the reference to the request. We need to employ our RCU request
protection to ensure that the request is not freed too early.
Fixes: df40306902 ("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191009100955.21477-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Assign a separate lockclass to the perma-pinned timelines of the
kernel_context, such that we can use them from within the user timelines
should we ever need to inject GPU operations to fixup faults during
request construction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008185941.15228-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
A common bane of ours is arbitrary delays in ksoftirqd processing our
submission tasklet. Give the submission tasklet a kick before we wait to
avoid those delays eating into a tight timeout.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008105655.13256-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we cannot claim the timeline->mutex while preparing for a wait on it,
we have to skip the timeline. In doing so, treat it as active so that
under a intel_gt_wait_for_idle() loop, we repeat the wait after
scheduling away.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191006165002.30312-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
