Initialize UEFI secure boot state during dom0 boot. Otherwise the kernel
may not even know that it runs on secure boot enabled platform.
Note that part of drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c is duplicated
by this patch, only in this case, it runs in the context of the kernel
proper rather than UEFI boot context. The reason for the duplication is
that maintaining the original code to run correctly on ARM/arm64 as well
as on all the quirky x86 firmware we support is enough of a burden as it
is, and adding the x86/Xen execution context to that mix just so we can
reuse a single routine just isn't worth it.
[ardb: explain rationale for code duplication]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180504060003.19618-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The current approach, which is the wholesale efi struct initialization from
a 'efi_xen' local template is not robust. Usually if new member is defined
then it is properly initialized in drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c, but not in
arch/x86/xen/efi.c.
The effect is that the Xen initialization clears any fields the generic code
might have set and the Xen code does not know about yet.
I saw this happen a few times, so let's initialize only the EFI struct members
used by Xen and maintain no local duplicate, to avoid such issues in the future.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1498128697-12943-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com
[ Clarified the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Move x86 specific codes to architecture directory and export those EFI
runtime service functions. This will be useful for initializing runtime
service on ARM later.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Tested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
I discovered that some needed stuff is defined/declared in headers
which are not included directly. Currently it works but if somebody
remove required headers from currently included headers then build
will break. So, just in case directly include all needed headers.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Compiler complains in the following way when x86 32-bit kernel
with Xen support is build:
CC arch/x86/xen/enlighten.o
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c: In function ‘xen_start_kernel’:
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:1726:3: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]
Such line contains following EFI initialization code:
boot_params.efi_info.efi_systab_hi = (__u32)(__pa(efi_systab_xen) >> 32);
There is no issue if x86 64-bit kernel is build. However, 32-bit case
generate warning (even if that code will not be executed because Xen
does not work on 32-bit EFI platforms) due to __pa() returning unsigned long
type which has 32-bits width. So move whole EFI initialization stuff
to separate function and build it conditionally to avoid above mentioned
warning on x86 32-bit architecture.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <Konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
