Let's avoid having to delve down the pointer chain to see if the i915
device has support for preemption and store that on the engine, which
made the decision in the first place!
v2: Refactor common preemption policy between execlists/guc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180403183537.5522-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We would like to start doing some bookkeeping at the beginning, between
contexts and at the end of execlists submission. We already mark the
beginning and end using EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER, to provide an indication
when the HW is idle. This give us a pair of sequence points we can then
expand on for further bookkeeping.
v2: Refactor guc submission to share the same begin/end.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180331130626.10712-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We're using those functions in selftests, and the callers are expected
to do the error handling anyways. Let's demote all GuC actions and
doorbell creation to DEBUG_DRIVER.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180319095348.9716-12-michal.winiarski@intel.com
GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.
This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.
v8:
- Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
- Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)
v9:
- Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)
v10:
- Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
to avoid potential issues (Joonas)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
Since we're inhibiting context save of preempt context, we're no longer
tracking the position of HEAD/TAIL. With GuC, we're adding a new
breadcrumb for each preemption, which means that the HW will do more and
more breadcrumb writes. Eventually the ring is filled, and we're
submitting the preemption context with HEAD==TAIL==0, which won't result
in breadcrumb write, but will trigger hangcheck instead.
Instead of writing a new preempt breadcrumb for each preemption, let's
just fill the ring once at init time (which also saves a couple of
instructions in the tasklet).
v2: Assert that context save restore is inhibited, don't assert on ring
alignment. (Chris)
v3: Cleanup checkpatch.
Fixes: 517aaffe0c ("drm/i915/execlists: Inhibit context save/restore for the fake preempt context")
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180226163800.21745-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Sometimes we need to boost the priority of an in-flight request, which
may lead to the situation where the second submission port then contains
a higher priority context than the first and so we need to inject a
preemption event. To do so we must always check inside
execlists_dequeue() whether there is a priority inversion between the
ports themselves as well as the head of the priority sorted queue, and we
cannot just skip dequeuing if the queue is empty.
As Michał noted, this doesn't simply extend to handling more than 2-port
submission, as we may need to reorder within the array of executing
requests which themselves are lower priority than the first. A task for
later!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222142229.14517-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency,
execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from
drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM
user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for
tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since
they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.)
In short, the spatch:
@@
@@
- struct drm_i915_gem_request
+ struct i915_request
A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using
'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and
repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members,
'request' is still much preferred for its clarity.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
The continual resubmission model for execlists (and emulated over guc)
requires that we keep feeding requests into the HW in order to generate
more CS interrupts to drain the rest of the queue. Add a couple of
asserts to ensure that we don't skip a cycle and come to a grinding
halt.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215162553.23348-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we remove some hardcoded assumptions about the preempt context having
a fixed id, reserved from use by normal user contexts, we may only
allocate the i915_gem_context when required. Then the subsequent
decisions on using preemption reduce to having the preempt context
available.
v2: Include an assert that we don't allocate the preempt context twice.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207210544.26351-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
In the next patch, we may only conditionally allocate the preempt-client
if there is a global preempt context and so we need to be prepared in
case the preempt-client itself is NULL.
v2: Grep for more preempt_client.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207210544.26351-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
The Additional Data Struct (ADS) contains objects that are required by
GuC post FW load and are not necessarily submission-only. Even with
submission disabled we may require something inside the ADS, so it
makes more sense for them to be always created.
Similarly, we need to access GuC logs and even if GuC submission
is disabled, to debug issues with GuC loading or with whatever we're using
GuC for.
v2: re-wording commit message (Sagar)
Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1514928025-29659-1-git-send-email-sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com
We have the selftest that's checking doorbell create/destroy, so there's
no need to check all doorbells delaying the reset every time.
We do want to have that extra sanity check at module load/unload though.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-7-michal.winiarski@intel.com
We can now move the clients allocation to submission_init path, rather
than keeping the condition inside submission_enable called on every
reset.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-6-michal.winiarski@intel.com
Full GPU reset causes GuC to be reset. This means that every time we're
doing a reset, we need to talk to GuC and tell it about doorbells.
Let's separate the communication part (create_doorbell) from our
internal bookkeeping (reserve_doorbell) so that we can cleanly separate
the initialization done at module load from reinitialization done at
reset in the following patch.
While I'm here, let's also add a proper (although slightly asymetric)
cleanup that doesn't try to communicate with GuC after it's already
gone, getting rid of "expected" warnings caused by GuC action failures
on module unload.
Note that I've also removed one of the tests (bitmap out of sync), since
it doesn't make much sense anymore - bitmaps are now not expected to
change during the lifetime of a client.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-5-michal.winiarski@intel.com
Sagar noticed the check can be consolidated between the engine stats
implementation and the PMU.
My first choice was a static inline helper but that got into include
ordering mess quickly fast so I went with a macro instead. At some point
we should perhaps looking into taking out the non-ringubffer bits from
intel_ringbuffer.h into a new intel_engine.h or something.
v2: Use engine->flags. (Chris Wilson)
v3: Rebase and mark GuC as not yet supported. (Chris Wilson)
v4: Move flag setting to intel_engines_reset_default_submission.
(Chris Wilson)
v5: Move flag setting to logical_ring_setup.
v6: intel_engines_reset_default_submission is the wrong place to set the
flag - it needs to be in execlists_set_default_submission. (Sagar)
v7: Flag setting in logical_ring_setup is not required. (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v6)
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171129102805.22690-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Since we know that the port is empty, we do not need to extract the
count from the old request it and copy it over to the new request, or
attempt to unref the NULL old request pointer.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171124130031.20761-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Our execlist emulation is intended to only use a maximum of 2 ports per
engine, so as to not overflow the wq. (By knowing the limits, we can
avoid having to handle the wq exhaustion.) However, upon adding
preemption, we lost the skip over the first port if set for the
non-preemption path. Restore it.
Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: c41937fd99 ("drm/i915/guc: Preemption! With GuC")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171124133745.5173-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
The first test aims to check guc_init_doorbell_hw, changing the existing
guc clients and doorbells state before calling it.
The second test tries to create as many clients as it is currently possible
(currently limited to max number of doorbells) and exercise the doorbell
alloc/dealloc code.
Since our usage mode require very few clients/doorbells, this code has
been exercised very lightly and it's good to have a simple test for it.
As reference, this test already helped identify the bug fixed by
commit 7f1ea2ac30 ("drm/i915/guc: Fix doorbell id selection").
v2: Extend number of clients; check for client allocation failure when
number of doorbells is exceeded; validate client properties; reuse
guc_init_doorbell_hw (Chris).
v3: guc_init_doorbell_hw test added per Chris suggestion.
v4: Try to explain why guc_init_doorbell_hw exist and comment some
details in the subtest.
v5: Remove redundant pr_info at the beginning of each subtest (Chris);
rebase (s/i915_guc_client/intel_guc_client/).
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171116220632.1909-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With all component structures and functions named appropriately, change
the names of GuC submission source files. There were bunch of style issues
in guc_submission.c that are highlighted now by checkpatch. Fix those.
Update name in Documentation/gpu. (Joonas)
v2: Rebase.
v3: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1510839162-25197-6-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
