Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Atish Patra
f99fb607fb
RISC-V: Use Linux logical CPU number instead of hartid
Setup the cpu_logical_map during boot. Moreover, every SBI call
and PLIC context are based on the physical hartid. Use the logical
CPU to hartid mapping to pass correct hartid to respective functions.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-10-22 17:03:37 -07:00
Luc Van Oostenryck
2861ae302f
riscv: use NULL instead of a plain 0
sbi_remote_sfence_vma() & sbi_remote_fence_i() takes
a pointer as first argument but some macros call them with
a plain 0 which, while legal C, is frowned upon in the kernel.

Change this by replacing the 0 by NULL.

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-06-07 08:01:50 -07:00
Andrew Waterman
f1b65f20fb
RISC-V: Limit the scope of TLB shootdowns
RISC-V systems perform TLB shootdows via the SBI, which currently
performs an IPI to each of the remote harts which then performs a local
TLB flush.  This process is a bit on the slow side, but we can at least
speed it up for some common cases by restricting the set of harts to
shoot down to the actual set of harts that are currently participating
in the given mm context, as opposed to the entire system.

This should provide a measurable performance increase, but we haven't
measured it.  Regardless, it seems like obviously the right thing to do
here.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
2018-01-30 19:13:33 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
c163fb38ca
riscv: remove CONFIG_MMU ifdefs
The RISC-V port doesn't suport a nommu mode, so there is no reason
to provide some code only under a CONFIG_MMU ifdef.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-01-07 15:14:39 -08:00
Palmer Dabbelt
07f8ba7439 RISC-V: User-Visible Changes
This merge contains the user-visible, ABI-breaking changes that we want
to make sure we have in Linux before our first release.   Highlights
include:

* VDSO entries for clock_get/gettimeofday/getcpu have been added.  These
  are simple syscalls now, but we want to let glibc use them from the
  start so we can make them faster later.
* A VDSO entry for instruction cache flushing has been added so
  userspace can flush the instruction cache.
* The VDSO symbol versions for __vdso_cmpxchg{32,64} have been removed,
  as those VDSO entries don't actually exist.

Conflicts:
        arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
2017-12-01 13:12:10 -08:00
Andrew Waterman
08f051eda3 RISC-V: Flush I$ when making a dirty page executable
The RISC-V ISA allows for instruction caches that are not coherent WRT
stores, even on a single hart.  As a result, we need to explicitly flush
the instruction cache whenever marking a dirty page as executable in
order to preserve the correct system behavior.

Local instruction caches aren't that scary (our implementations actually
flush the cache, but RISC-V is defined to allow higher-performance
implementations to exist), but RISC-V defines no way to perform an
instruction cache shootdown.  When explicitly asked to do so we can
shoot down remote instruction caches via an IPI, but this is a bit on
the slow side.

Instead of requiring an IPI to all harts whenever marking a page as
executable, we simply flush the currently running harts.  In order to
maintain correct behavior, we additionally mark every other hart as
needing a deferred instruction cache which will be taken before anything
runs on it.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2017-11-30 12:58:25 -08:00
Palmer Dabbelt
c901e45a99 RISC-V: sfence.vma orderes the instruction cache
This is just a comment change, but it's one that bit me on the mailing
list.  It turns out that issuing a `sfence.vma` enforces instruction
cache ordering in addition to TLB ordering.  This isn't explicitly
called out in the ISA manual, but Andrew will be making that more clear
in a future revision.

CC: Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2017-11-28 14:06:17 -08:00
Palmer Dabbelt
fab957c11e RISC-V: Atomic and Locking Code
This contains all the code that directly interfaces with the RISC-V
memory model.  While this code corforms to the current RISC-V ISA
specifications (user 2.2 and priv 1.10), the memory model is somewhat
underspecified in those documents.  There is a working group that hopes
to produce a formal memory model by the end of the year, but my
understanding is that the basic definitions we're relying on here won't
change significantly.

Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
2017-09-26 15:26:45 -07:00