I tried to avoid having to track the write for every VMA by only
tracking writes to the ggtt. However, for the purposes of frontbuffer
tracking this is insufficient as we need to invalidate around writes not
just to the the ggtt but all aliased ppgtt views of the framebuffer. By
moving the critical section to the object and only doing so for
framebuffer writes we can reduce the tracking even further by only
watching framebuffers and not vma.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161116190704.5293-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rather than a mismash of struct drm_device *dev and struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv being used freely within a function, be
consistent and only pass along dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The individual bits inside obj->frontbuffer_bits are protected by each
plane->mutex, but the whole bitfield may be accessed by multiple KMS
operations simultaneously and so the RMW need to be under atomics.
However, for updating the single field we do not need to mandate that it
be under the struct_mutex, one more step towards its removal as the de
facto BKL.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We only need a very lightweight mechanism here as the locking is only
used for co-ordinating a bitfield.
v2: Move the cheap unlikely tests into the caller
v3: Move the kerneldoc into the header (now separated out into
intel_fronbuffer.h for better kerneldoc and readability)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtien <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-20-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In view of adding inline functions into the intel_frontbuffer section,
we first split the header into its own file so that we can integrate it
more easily with kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
