Functions implementing FW commands had to implement this themselves, let's
move that to common code and plumb the return code from callbacks through.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
Arbitrary private data passed to callbacks is to allow for something other
than struct nvkm_msgqueue to be passed into the callback (like the pointer
to the subdev itself, for example), and the return code will be used where
we'd like to detect failure from synchronous messages.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
This is an incremental step towards that goal.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
This is an incremental step towards that goal.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
This is an incremental step towards that goal.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
To make things clearer while modifying the interfaces, split msgqueue into
Queue Manager, Command Queue, and Message Queue.
There should be no code changes here, these will be done incrementally.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVDEC is available from GM107, and we currently only have a stub
implementation anyway, let's make it explicit.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
ACR LS FW loading is moving out of SECBOOT and into their specific subdevs,
and the available GP108/GV100 FWs differ from the other GP10x boards.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
ACR LS FW loading is moving out of SECBOOT and into their specific subdevs,
and the available GP107/GP108 FWs have interface differences.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
ACR LS FW loading is moving out of SECBOOT and into their specific subdevs,
and the available GM20B/GP10B FWs have interface differences.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
PMU, SEC2 and GR will be modified to register their falcons with ACR before
the main commit switching everything over.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Will be used in upcoming commits to allow subdevs to better customise
themselves based on which (if any) firmware is available.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We want to be able to register falcons with ACR during the constructor for
the subdev it belongs to, however, we may not have access to the falcon's
registers prior to DEVINIT.
Delay touching registers until the first time the falcon is acquired.
This may temporarily break secboot on non-production boards due to not
being able to determine whether the falcon is in debug or production mode,
the new ACR subdev will not have this issue, and it's not a use-case that's
terribly important for bisectability.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c: In function nouveau_vram_manager_new:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:66:22: warning: variable mem set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c: In function nouveau_gart_manager_new:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:106:22: warning: variable mem set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
They are not used any more, so remove it.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Like other cases, it should use rcu protected 'chan' rather
than 'fence->channel' in nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler.
Fixes: 0ec5f02f0e ("drm/nouveau: prevent stale fence->channel pointers, and protect with rcu")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
