The pagefault and the resched IPI handler are the only ones where it is
worth to optimize the code further in case tracepoints are disabled. But it
makes no sense to have a single static key for both.
Seperate the static keys so the facilities are handled seperately.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170828064957.536699116@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Switching the IDT just for avoiding tracepoints creates a completely
impenetrable macro/inline/ifdef mess.
There is no point in avoiding tracepoints for most of the traps/exceptions.
For the more expensive tracepoints, like pagefaults, this can be handled with
an explicit static key.
Preparatory patch to remove the tracing IDT.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170828064956.593094539@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Some tracepoints have a registration function that gets enabled when the
tracepoint is enabled. There may be cases that the registraction function
must fail (for example, can't allocate enough memory). In this case, the
tracepoint should also fail to register, otherwise the user would not know
why the tracepoint is not working.
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tracepoints are named hierachially, and it makes more sense to keep a
general flow of information level from general to specific from left
to right, i.e.
x86_exceptions.page_fault_user|kernel
rather than
x86_exceptions.user|kernel_page_fault
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131111082955.GB12405@gmail.com
