Since everybody copied my own mistake from the DT binding example,
let's address all the offenders in one swift go.
Most of them got the CPU interface size wrong (4kB, while it should
be 8kB), except for both keystone platforms which got the control
interface wrong (4kB instead of 8kB).
In a few cases where I knew for sure what implementation was used,
I've added the "arm,gic-400" compatible string. I'm 99% sure that
this is what everyone is using, but short of having the TRM for
all the other SoCs, I've left them alone.
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Replace hard-coded values of type of GIC interrupt and its flags with
respective macros from header to increase code readability.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Interrupt of type IRQ_TYPE_NONE is not allowed for GIC interrupts and
generates an error:
genirq: Setting trigger mode 0 for irq 16 failed (gic_set_type+0x0/0x68)
The GIC requires shared interrupts to be edge rising or level high.
Platform declares support for both. Arbitrarily choose level high
everywhere hoping it will work on each platform.
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
The skeleton.dtsi file was removed in ARM64 for different reasons as
explained in commit ("3ebee5a2e141 arm64: dts: kill skeleton.dtsi").
These also applies to ARM and it will also allow to get rid of the
following DTC warnings in the future:
"Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name"
The disassembled DTB are almost the same besides an empty chosen
node being removed and nodes reordered, so it should not have
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
The conventions is to put SoC devices under 'soc' node. In fact other
our DTSes (like exynos3250.dtsi or exynos5410.dtsi) already follow it.
Adjust exynos5250 and exynos5420 DTSI to follow this convention. This is
also necessary for the upcoming change in exynos5410.dtsi to inherit
from common exynos5.dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Add 'sromc' label to SROM memory controller in common exynos5.dtsi so it
can be referenced by inheriting DTSI.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Exynos5420 and Exynos5250 share some nodes: the PWM, syscon
(sysreg_system_controller) and first four I2C controllers. Move them to
parent DTSI to avoid duplication.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
This patch changes SROM nodes compatible from generic to model specific
to match with binding documentation. Also updating property
"samsung,srom-page-mode" as it is not defined as bool instead of int
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
All Exynos SoCs have the same syscon reboot and poweroff device nodes so
there is no need to duplicate the same on each SoC dtsi and can be moved
to a common dtsi that can be included by all the SoCs dtsi files.
Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung,com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
This patch adds syscon-{reboot, poweroff} nodes to allow the
generic syscon-{reboot, poweroff} driver to reset/poweroff exynos5 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Add new labels to certain nodes so they could be easily referenced by
Exynos5 board DTS files.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Pull DRM updates from Dave Airlie:
"Like all good pull reqs this ends with a revert, so it must mean we
tested it,
[ Ed. That's _one_ way of looking at it ]
This pull is missing nouveau, Ben has been stuck trying to track down
a very longstanding bug that revealed itself due to some other
changes. I've asked him to send you a direct pull request for nouveau
once he cleans things up. I'm away until Monday so don't want to
delay things, you can make a decision on that when he sends it, I have
my phone so I can ack things just not really merge much.
It has one trivial conflict with your tree in armada_drv.c, and also
the pull request contains some component changes that are already in
your tree, the base tree from Russell went via Greg's tree already,
but some stuff still shows up in here that doesn't when I merge my
tree into yours.
Otherwise all pretty standard graphics fare, one new driver and
changes all over the place.
New drivers:
- sti kms driver for STMicroelectronics chipsets stih416 and stih407.
core:
- lots of cleanups to the drm core
- DP MST helper code merged
- universal cursor planes.
- render nodes enabled by default
panel:
- better panel interfaces
- new panel support
- non-continuous cock advertising ability
ttm:
- shrinker fixes
i915:
- hopefully ditched UMS support
- runtime pm fixes
- psr tracking and locking - now enabled by default
- userptr fixes
- backlight brightness fixes
- MST support merged
- runtime PM for dpms
- primary planes locking fixes
- gen8 hw semaphore support
- fbc fixes
- runtime PM on SOix sleep state hw.
- mmio base page flipping
- lots of vlv/chv fixes.
- universal cursor planes
radeon:
- Hawaii fixes
- display scalar support for non-fixed mode displays
- new firmware format support
- dpm on more asics by default
- GPUVM improvements
- uncached and wc GTT buffers
- BOs > visible VRAM
exynos:
- i80 interface support
- module auto-loading
- ipp driver consolidated.
armada:
- irq handling in crtc layer only
- crtc renumbering
- add component support
- DT interaction changes.
tegra:
- load as module fixes
- eDP bpp and sync polarity fixed
- DSI non-continuous clock mode support
- better support for importing buffers from nouveau
msm:
- mdp5/adq8084 v1.3 hw enablement
- devicetree clk changse
- ifc6410 board working
tda998x:
- component support
- DT documentation update
vmwgfx:
- fix compat shader namespace"
* 'drm-next' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux: (551 commits)
Revert "drm: drop redundant drm_file->is_master"
drm/panel: simple: Use devm_gpiod_get_optional()
drm/dsi: Replace upcasting macro by function
drm/panel: ld9040: Replace upcasting macro by function
drm/exynos: dp: Modify driver to support drm_panel
drm/exynos: Move DP setup into commit()
drm/panel: simple: Add AUO B133HTN01 panel support
drm/panel: simple: Support delays in panel functions
drm/panel: simple: Add proper definition for prepare and unprepare
drm/panel: s6e8aa0: Add proper definition for prepare and unprepare
drm/panel: ld9040: Add proper definition for prepare and unprepare
drm/tegra: Add support for panel prepare and unprepare routines
drm/exynos: dsi: Add support for panel prepare and unprepare routines
drm/exynos: dpi: Add support for panel prepare and unprepare routines
drm/panel: simple: Add dummy prepare and unprepare routines
drm/panel: s6e8aa0: Add dummy prepare and unprepare routines
drm/panel: ld9040: Add dummy prepare and unprepare routines
drm/panel: Provide convenience wrapper for .get_modes()
drm/panel: add .prepare() and .unprepare() functions
drm/panel: simple: Remove simple-panel compatible
...
This patch adds sysreg property to fimd device node
which is required to use I80 interface.
Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This patch adds alias entries for UART nodes of all SoCs using
samsung-uart compatible UART controllers, so that the dependency on
probe order is removed and deterministic device naming is assured.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In EXYNOS5 series SoCs, PMU has registers to enable/disable mask/unmask
watchdog timer which is not the case with s3c series SoCs so, there is a
need to have different compatible names for watchdog to handle these pmu
registers access.
Hence this patch removes watchdog node from Exynos5.dtsi common file and
make it separate by updating existing node in Exynos5250 and adding new node
to Exynos5420. This patch also makes the watchdog node enabled by default
Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
For consistency with other device tree nodes, this patch adds missing
spaces after node labels.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Exynos5 series SOC's 5250 and 5420 have different versions of
DWMMC controller.So there is a new compatible string to distinguish
between them.So these nodes should be moved out of Exynos5 series
common device tree source to SOC specific device tree source.
Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Fixes the RTC DT node name for Exynos5250 as per the DT node naming
convention.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Moves the properties of DP controller to exynos5.dtsi which are common
across exynos5 SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.
The PHY DP Node is based on Jingoo Han's <jg1.han@samsung.com> patch
at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/19189/
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Moves the properties of FIMD DT node which are common across Exynos5 based
SoCs like Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 to exynos5.dtsi
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
In preparation of adding support for EXYNOS5420, which has many
peripherals similar to EXYNOS5250, a new common EXYNOS5 device tree
source file is created out of the exising EXYNOS5250 device tree
source file. Only the common nodes required for basic boot up on
EXYNOS5420 based boards are moved into this new file and the rest
of the common nodes would be moved subsequently.
EXYNOS5440 SoC is quite different from EXYNOS5250 and EXYNOS5420.
Hence it is not possible to reuse "exynos5.dtsi" for EXYNOS5440.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
