list_for_each_entry_reverse() dereferences the iterator, but we already
freed it. I don't see a reason that this has to be done in reverse order
so change it to use list_for_each_entry_safe().
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Limit the access to userspace only on the BSP where we load the
container, verify the patches in it and put them in the patch cache.
Then, at application time, we lookup the correct patch in the cache and
use it.
When we need to reload the userspace container, we do that over the
reload interface:
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload
which reloads (a possibly newer) container from userspace and applies
then the newest patches from there.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-13-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
This is a trivial cache which collects all ucode patches for the current
family of CPUs on the system. If a newer patch appears due to the
container file being updated in userspace, we replace our cached version
with the new one.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-12-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
We search the equivalence table using the CPUID(1) signature of the
CPU in order to get the equivalence ID of the patch which we need to
apply. Add a function which does the reverse - it will be needed in
later patches.
While at it, pull the other equiv table function up in the file so that
it can be used by other functionality without forward declarations.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-11-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
This is done in preparation for teaching the ucode driver to either load
a new ucode patches container from userspace or use an already cached
version. No functionality change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-10-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Read the CPUID(1).EAX leaf at the correct cpu and use it to search the
equivalence table for matching microcode patch. No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-9-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Make sure we're actually applying a microcode patch to a core which
really needs it.
This brings only a very very very minor slowdown on F10:
0.032218828 sec vs 0.056010626 sec with this patch.
And small speedup on F15:
0.487089449 sec vs 0.180551162 sec (from perf output).
Also, fixup comments while at it.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-8-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
get_ucode_data was a trivial memcpy wrapper. Remove it so as not to
obfuscate code unnecessarily with no obvious gain.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-7-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
This issue was recently observed on an AMD C-50 CPU where a patch of
maximum size was applied.
Commit be62adb492 ("x86, microcode, AMD: Simplify ucode verification")
added current_size in get_matching_microcode(). This is calculated as
size of the ucode patch + 8 (ie. size of the header). Later this is
compared against the maximum possible ucode patch size for a CPU family.
And of course this fails if the patch has already maximum size.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.3+]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Exit early when there's no support for a particular CPU family. Also,
fixup the "no support for this CPU vendor" to be issued only when the
driver is attempted to be loaded on an unsupported vendor.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120411163849.GE4794@alberich.amd.com
[Boris: add a commit msg because Andreas is lazy]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
AMD processors will never support /dev/cpu/microcode updating so
just silently fail instead of printing out a warning for every
cpu.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1328552935-965-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We've decided to provide CPU family specific container files
(starting with CPU family 15h). E.g. for family 15h we have to
load microcode_amd_fam15h.bin instead of microcode_amd.bin
Rationale is that starting with family 15h patch size is larger
than 2KB which was hard coded as maximum patch size in various
microcode loaders (not just Linux).
Container files which include patches larger than 2KB cause
different kinds of trouble with such old patch loaders. Thus we
have to ensure that the default container file provides only
patches with size less than 2KB.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120120164412.GD24508@alberich.amd.com
[ documented the naming convention and tidied the code a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Once we've found and validated the ucode patch for the current CPU,
there's no need to iterate over the remaining patches in the binary
image. Exit then and save us a bunch of cycles.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Basically, what we did until now is take out a chunk of the firmware
image, vmalloc space for it and inspect it before application. And
repeat.
This patch changes all that so that we look at each ucode patch from
the firmware image, check it for sanity and copy it to local buffer for
application only once and if it passes all checks. Thus, vmalloc-ing for
each piece is gone, we can do proper size checking only of the patch
which is destined for the CPU of the current machine instead of each
single patch, which is clearly wrong.
Oh yeah, simplify and cleanup the code while at it, along with adding
comments as to what actually happens.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Add a simple 4K page which gets allocated on driver init and freed on
driver exit instead of vmalloc'ing small buffers for each ucode patch.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Enable microcode revision output for AMD after 506ed6b53e ("x86,
intel: Output microcode revision in /proc/cpuinfo") did it for Intel.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
The ucode size check has to take the section header size into account
too when sanity checking the section length. Shorten and clarify define
names, while at it.
Caught-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302752223.5282.674.camel@localhost
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Both the equivalence table and the microcode patch types are u32. Access
them properly through the buf-ptr.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
install_equiv_cpu_table() returns type int. It uses negative
error codes so using an unsigned type breaks the error handling.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: open list:AMD MICROCODE UPD... <amd64-microcode@amd64.org>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <20110218091716.GA4384@bicker>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The different families have a different max size for the ucode patch,
adjust size checking to the family we're running on. Also, do not
vzalloc the max size of the ucode but only the actual size that is
passed on from the firmware loader.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Unify pr_* to use pr_fmt, shorten messages, correct type formatting.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>
collect_cpu_info_amd() clears its csig arg but this is done in the
microcode_core's collect_cpu_info() by clearing the embedding struct
ucode_cpu_info. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>
Do not copy the section header but look at it directly through the
pointer. Also, make it return a ptr to a ucode header directly
thus dropping a bunch of unneeded casts. Finally, simplify
generic_load_microcode(), while at it.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>
There's no need to memcpy the ucode header in order to look at it only
in this function - use the original buffer instead. Also, fix return
type semantics by returning a negative value on error and a positive
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>
When the ucode magic is wrong, for whatever reason, we don't release the
loaded firmware binary and its related resources. Make sure we do. Also,
fix function naming to fit this driver's convention and shorten variable
names.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com>
* 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
x86, microcode, AMD: Cleanup code a bit
x86, microcode, AMD: Replace vmalloc+memset with vzalloc
get_ucode_data is a memcpy() wrapper which always returns 0. Move it
into the header and make it an inline. Remove all code checking its
return value and turn it into a void.
There should be no functionality change resulting from this patch.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
We don't have to do memset() ourselves after vmalloc() when we have
vzalloc(), so change that in
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c::get_next_ucode().
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
The [vk][cmz]alloc(_node) family of functions return void
pointers which it's completely unnecessary/pointless to cast to
other pointer types since that happens implicitly.
This patch removes such casts from arch/x86.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Cc: amd64-microcode@amd64.org
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011082310220.23697@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Commit d1c84f79a6
leads to a regression when microcode_amd.c is compiled into the kernel.
It causes a big boot delay because the firmware is not available.
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126267290920060
It also renders the reload sysfs attribute useless.
Fixing this is too intrusive for an -rc5 kernel.
Thus I'd like to restore the microcode loading behaviour of kernel
2.6.32.
CC: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100122203456.GB13792@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
- Use #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
- Remove "microcode: " prefix from each pr_<level>
- Fix duplicated KERN_ERR prefix
- Coalesce pr_<level> format strings
- Add a space after an exclamation point
No other change in output.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1260340250.27677.191.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
There is no point in warning when there is no ucode available
for a specific CPU revision. Currently the container-file, which
provides the AMD ucode patches for OS load, contains only a few
ucode patches.
It's already clearly indicated by the printed patch_level
whenever new ucode was available and an update happened. So the
warning message is of no help but rather annoying on systems
with many CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091110110825.GI30802@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This also implies that corresponding log messages, e.g.
platform microcode: firmware: requesting amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin
show up only once on module load and not when ucode is updated
for each CPU.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091110110723.GH30802@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
vfree() does its own 'NULL' check, so no need for check before
calling it.
In v2, remove the stray newline.
[ Impact: cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1244385036.3402.11.camel@myhost>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* Solve issues described in 6f66cbc630
in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed();
* in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks
must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other.
smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run
these callbacks on a target cpu.
* cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part
The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu
(be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT)
is being updated at any particular moment of time.
In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in
arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks).
See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.
* return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in
microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions
for an error code?
* use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user}
to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases
and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an
error per-se).
* some minor cleanups
Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing!
Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2
[ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth>
[ did some more cleanups ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++----
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++-------
4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-)
(~20 new comment lines)
this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c: In function ‘apply_microcode_amd’:
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:163: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:163: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
triggers because we want to pass the address to the microcode MSR,
which is 64-bit even on 32-bit. Cast it explicitly to express this.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: remove dead/incorrect code
Currently there is no chipset specific ucode. The checks are incorrect
anyway (e.g. pci device IDs are 16 bit and not 8 bit).
Thus I remove the stuff for the time being and will reintroduce it if
it's foreseeable that it is really needed.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: fix build warning
CC arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.o
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c: In function ‘request_microcode_fw’:
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:393: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘generic_load_microcode’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type
(Respect "const" qualifier of firmware->data.)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
