This patch sends command and executes display off,
assert reset, power off VBT seqeuences to power
down DSI panel. Patch also adds high level function
to wrap all the panel sepcific programming during
DSI disabling.
Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/efdafbf6b4d31123738b87b2d8264a9b5553eb32.1540900289.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Driver needs payload/header credits for sending any command
and data over DSI link. These credits are released once command
or data sent to link. This patch adds functions to wait for releasing
of payload and header credits.
As per BSPEC, driver needs to ensure that all of commands/data
has been dispatched to panel before the transcoder is enabled.
This patch implement those steps i.e. sending NOP DCS command,
wait for header/payload credit to be released etc.
v2 by Jani:
- squash the credit wait helpers patch with the first user
- pass dev_priv to the credit wait helpers
- bikeshed credit helper names
- wait for *at least* the current maximum number of credits
- indentation fix
- add helpers for credits available
Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/84bc509beabf2a2d1324a9f2a67ab4ebe05b10a6.1540900289.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Commit b24413180f ("License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license
identifier to files with no license") added "SPDX-License-Identifier:
GPL-2.0" to files which previously had no license, change this to MIT
for intel_ringbuffer.h matching the license text of intel_ringbuffer.c.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181031005331.20775-1-jsg@jsg.id.au
When using softpin it's not enough to just pad the vma size, we also
need to ensure the vma offset is at the start of the pt boundary, if we
plan to utilize 64K pages. Therefore to improve test coverage we should
use both aligned and unaligned gtt offsets in igt_write_huge.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181029203734.21936-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
This reverts commit c9e666880d.
Checked GVT codes that guest PPGTT PTE flag bits are propagated
to shadow PTE. Read/write bit is not changed. Further tested by
i915 self-test case "igt_ctx_readonly". No error or GPU hang was
detected. So enable read-only support under GVT.
Signed-off-by: Hang Yuan <hang.yuan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1540883281-11359-1-git-send-email-hang.yuan@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tell the version numbers when the pptable versions do not match.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch will work as workaround for silicon limitation
related to PWM dutycycle when the backlight level goes to 0.
Actually PWM value is 16 bit value and valid range from 1-65535.
when ever user requested to set this PWM value to 0 which is not
fall in the range, in VBIOS taken care this by limiting to 1.
This patch here will do the same. Either driver or VBIOS can not
pass 0 value as it is not a valid range for PWM and it will
give a high PWM pulse which is not the intended behaviour as
per HW constraints.
Signed-off-by: suresh guttula <suresh.guttula@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
ICL supports DC5, DC6, and DC9. Enable DC9 during screen-off, and enable
DC5/6 when appropriate.
v2: (James Ausmus)
- Also handle ICL as GEN9_LP in i915_drm_suspend_late and
i915_drm_suspend_early
- Add DC9 to gen9_dc_mask for ICL
- Re-order GEN checks for newest platform first
- Use INTEL_GEN instead of INTEL_INFO->gen
- Use INTEL_GEN >= 11 instead of IS_ICELAKE
- Consolidate GEN checks
v3: (James Ausmus)
- Also allow DC6 for ICL (Imre, Art)
- Simplify !(GEN >= 11) to GEN < 11 (Imre)
v4: (James Ausmus)
- Don't call intel_power_sequencer_reset after DC9 for Gen11+, as the
PPS regs are Always On
- Rebase against upstream changes
v5: (Anusha Srivatsa)
- rebased against the latest upstream changes.
v6: (Anusha Srivatsa)
- rebased.Use INTEL_GEN consistently.
- Simplify the code (Rodrigo)
v7: rebased. Change order according to platforms(Jyoti)
v8: rebased. Change the check from platform specific to
HAS_PCH_SPLIT(). Add comment in code to be more clear.(Rodrigo)
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jyoti Yadav <jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181029221410.4423-1-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com
If we reduce the suspend function for intel_opregion to do the minimum
required, the resume function can also do the simple task of notifier
the ACPI bios that we are back. This avoid some nasty restrictions on
the likes of register_acpi_notifier() that are not allowed during the
early phase of resume.
v2: Keep the order of acpi notify vs turning off ardy/drdy the same.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181030110554.4111-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we can prevent stray writes from landing in the scratch page, we can
reuse the same page and same scratch PT for all contexts without fear of
information leaks and side-channels.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181029182721.29568-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Record the scratch PTE encoding upon creation rather than recomputing
the bits everytime. This is important for the next patch where we forgo
having a valid scratch page with which we may compute the bits and so
require keeping the PTE value instead.
v2: Fix up scrub_64K to use scratch_pte as well.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181029182721.29568-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
intel_fb_pitch_limit() has the parameters pixel_format and fb_modifier
switched in their positions. The parameters are however used correctly,
but change the order for consistency.
Also use kernel data types for both parameters.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026195342.16828-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
The PLANE_AUX_OFFSET mmio does not exist on ICL, do not program it. We'll
still calculate the aux offset as it is required for adjusing x-y offsets.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026193805.11077-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
A framebuffer can comprise surfaces with distinct tiling formats,
making checks against modifier alone insufficient. Make use of a
function to identify a linear surface based on both modifier and color
plane.
v2: Typo fix
v3: remove 'inline' from function definition (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026193805.11077-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
The specially case for SKL for not controlled sagv
is already taken care inside intel_enable_sagv, so there's
no need to duplicate the check here.
v2: Go one step further and remove skl special case. (Jani)
v3: Separate runtime status handle from has_sagv flag.
v4: Go back and accept simple Jani proposed solution.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026200317.21726-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
The vm of two contexts are supposed to be independent, such that a stray
write by one cannot be detected by another. Normally the GTT is filled
explicitly by userspace, but the space in between objects is filled with
a scratch page -- and that scratch page should not be able to form an
inter-context backchannel.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181029172925.10159-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
While checking the opportunity to add a display_gen
check to allow glk and cnl to be on same bucket I noticed
these FIXME cases here.
So I got the confirmation from HW architect that we actually
never needed this workaround.
"GLK supports 2 pixel per clock, so pixel clock can be up to 2 * cdclk."
So, this reverts commit 97f55ca5b6 ("drm/i915/glk: limit pixel
clock to 99% of cdclk workaround")
Fixes: 97f55ca5b6 ("drm/i915/glk: limit pixel clock to 99% of cdclk workaround")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026005636.22274-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
commit ac657f6461 ("drm/i915: Introduce IS_GEN macro") introduced
GEN_FOREVER that was never used.
My first attempt was to rename it to FOREVER since GEN is
already part of the macro. Then I used coccinelle to change all
-INTEL_GEN(e1) >= e2
+INTEL_GEN_RANGE(e1, e2, FOREVER)
-INTEL_GEN(e1) <= e2
+INTEL_GEN_RANGE(e1, 0, e2)
and I liked it.
However I didn't like very much the remaining
INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < n
and:
INTEL_GEN(e1) < n
INTEL_GEN_RANGE(e1, 0, n - 1)
didn't make much sense either.
So INTEL_GEN use for > or < seems a better unified way for unlimited
bounds. So, no reason to keep GEN_FOREVER here.
Let's kill before someone start using it.
v2: Remove remaining GEN_FOREVER forgotten in a comment. (Daniel)
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181026195143.20353-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
As far as I can tell the panel that was added in commit da50bd4258
("drm/panel: simple: Add Innolux TV123WAM panel driver support")
wasn't actually an Innolux TV123WAM but was actually an Innolux
P120ZDG-BF1.
As far as I can tell the Innolux TV123WAM isn't a real panel and but
it's a mosh between the TI TV123WAM and the Innolux P120ZDG-BF1.
Let's unmosh.
Here's my evidence:
* Searching for TV123WAM on the Internet turns up a TI panel. While
it's possible that an Innolux panel has the same model number as the
TI Panel, it seems a little doubtful. Looking up the datasheet from
the TI Panel shows that it's 1920 x 1280 and 259.2 mm x 172.8 mm.
* As far as I know, the patch adding the Innolux Panel was supposed to
be for the board that's sitting in front of me as I type this
(support for that board is not yet upstream). On the back of that
panel I see Innolux P120ZDZ-EZ1 rev B1.
* Someone pointed me at a datasheet that's supposed to be for the
panel in front of me (sorry, I can't share the datasheet). That
datasheet has the string "p120zdg-bf1"
* If I search for "P120ZDG-BF1" on the Internet I get hits for panels
that are 2160x1440. They don't have datasheets, but the fact that
the resolution matches is a good sign.
In any case, let's update the name and also the physical size to match
the correct panel.
Fixes: da50bd4258 ("drm/panel: simple: Add Innolux TV123WAM panel driver support")
Cc: Sandeep Panda <spanda@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-6-dianders@chromium.org
As far as I can tell the bindings that were added in commit
9c04400f7e ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: Document Innolux TV123WAM panel
bindings") weren't actually for Innolux TV123WAM but were actually for
Innolux P120ZDG-BF1.
As far as I can tell the Innolux TV123WAM isn't a real panel and but
it's a mosh between the TI TV123WAM and the Innolux P120ZDG-BF1.
Let's unmosh.
Here's my evidence:
* Searching for TV123WAM on the Internet turns up a TI panel. While
it's possible that an Innolux panel has the same model number as the
TI Panel, it seems a little doubtful. Looking up the datasheet from
the TI Panel shows that it's 1920 x 1280 and 259.2 mm x 172.8 mm.
* As far as I know, the patch adding the Innolux Panel was supposed to
be for the board that's sitting in front of me as I type this
(support for that board is not yet upstream). On the back of that
panel I see Innolux P120ZDZ-EZ1 rev B1.
* Someone pointed me at a datasheet that's supposed to be for the
panel in front of me (sorry, I can't share the datasheet). That
datasheet has the string "p120zdg-bf1"
* If I search for "P120ZDG-BF1" on the Internet I get hits for panels
that are 2160x1440. They don't have datasheets, but the fact that
the resolution matches is a good sign.
While we doing the rename, also mention that no-hpd can be used with
this panel. See the previous patch in this series ("drm/panel:
simple: Add "no-hpd" delay for Innolux TV123WAM").
Fixes: 9c04400f7e ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: Document Innolux TV123WAM panel bindings")
Cc: Sandeep Panda <spanda@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-5-dianders@chromium.org
Let's solve the mystery of commit bf1178c989 ("drm/bridge:
ti-sn65dsi86: Add mystery delay to enable()"). Specifically the
reason we needed that mystery delay is that we weren't paying
attention to HPD.
Looking at the datasheet for the same panel that was tested for the
original commit, I see there's a timing "t3" that times from power on
to the aux channel being operational. This time is specced as 0 - 200
ms. The datasheet says that the aux channel is operational at exactly
the same time that HPD is asserted.
Scoping the signals on this board showed that HPD was asserted 84 ms
after power was asserted. That very closely matches the magic 70 ms
delay that we had. ...and actually, in my testing the 70 ms wasn't
quite enough of a delay and some percentage of the time the display
didn't come up until I bumped it to 100 ms (presumably 84 ms would
have worked too).
To solve this, we tried to hook up the HPD signal in the bridge.
...but in doing so we found that that the bridge didn't report that
HPD was asserted until ~280 ms after we powered it (!). This is
explained by looking at the sn65dsi86 datasheet section "8.4.5.1 HPD
(Hot Plug/Unplug Detection)". Reading there we see that the bridge
isn't even intended to report HPD until 100 ms after it's asserted.
...but that would have left us at 184 ms. The extra 100 ms
(presumably) comes from this part in the datasheet:
> The HPD state machine operates off an internal ring oscillator. The
> ring oscillator frequency will vary [ ... ]. The min/max range in
> the HPD State Diagram refers to the possible times based off
> variation in the ring oscillator frequency.
Given that the 280 ms we'll end up delaying if we hook up HPD is
_slower_ than the 200 ms we could just hardcode, for now we'll solve
the problem by just hardcoding a 200 ms delay in the panel driver
using the patch in this series ("drm/panel: simple: Support panels
with HPD where HPD isn't connected").
If we later find a panel that needs to use this bridge where we need
HPD then we'll have to come up with some new code to handle it. Given
the silly debouncing in the bridge chip, though, it seems unlikely.
One last note is that I tried to solve this through another way: In
ti_sn_bridge_enable() I tried to use various combinations of
dp_dpcd_writeb() and dp_dpcd_readb() to detect when the aux channel
was up. In theory that would let me detect _exactly_ when I could
continue and do link training. Unfortunately even if I did an aux
transfer w/out waiting I couldn't see any errors. Possibly I could
keep looping over link training until it came back with success, but
that seemed a little overly hacky to me.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-4-dianders@chromium.org
If the HPD signal isn't hooked up to this panel we need a 200 ms
delay. In the datasheet this is shown as the maximum time that HPD
will take to be asserted after power is given to the panel.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-3-dianders@chromium.org
Some eDP panels that are designed to be always connected to a board
use their HPD signal to signal that they've finished powering on and
they're ready to be talked to.
However, for various reasons it's possible that the HPD signal from
the panel isn't actually hooked up. In the case where the HPD isn't
hooked up you can look at the timing diagram on the panel datasheet
and insert a delay for the maximum amount of time that the HPD might
take to come up.
Let's add support in simple-panel for this concept.
At the moment we will co-opt the existing "prepare" delay to keep
track of the delay and we'll use a boolean to specify that a given
panel should only apply the delay if the "no-hpd" property was
specified.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-2-dianders@chromium.org
Some eDP panels that are designed to be always connected to a board
use their HPD signal to signal that they've finished powering on and
they're ready to be talked to.
However, for various reasons it's possible that the HPD signal from
the panel isn't actually hooked up. In the case where the HPD isn't
hooked up you can look at the timing diagram on the panel datasheet
and insert a delay for the maximum amount of time that the HPD might
take to come up.
Let's add a property in the device tree for this concept.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-1-dianders@chromium.org
Intel HDCP2.2 registers are defined with addr offsets and bit details.
v2:
Replaced the arith calc with _PICK [Sean Paul]
v3:
No changes.
v4:
%s/HDCP2_CTR_DDI/HDCP2_CTL_DDI [Uma]
v5:
Added parentheses for the parameters of macro.
v6:
No changes
v7:
No changes
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1540806351-7137-7-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com
This patch adds HDCP register definitions for HDMI and DP HDCP
adaptations.
HDMI specific HDCP2.2 register definitions are added into drm_hdcp.h,
where as HDCP2.2 register offsets in DPCD offsets are defined at
drm_dp_helper.h.
v2:
bit_field definitions are replaced by macros. [Tomas and Jani]
v3:
No Changes.
v4:
Comments style and typos are fixed [Uma]
v5:
Fix for macros.
v6:
Adds _MS to the timeouts to represent units [Sean Paul]
v7:
Macro DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_EKH_KM_OFFSET renamed [Uma]
Redundant macro is removed [Uma]
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> (for merging through drm-intel)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1540806351-7137-6-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com
This patch defines the hdcp2.2 protocol messages for authentication.
v2:
bit_fields are removed. Instead bitmasking used. [Tomas and Jani]
prefix HDCP_2_2_ is added to the macros. [Tomas]
v3:
No Changes.
v4:
Style and spellings are fixed [Uma]
v5:
Fix for macros.
v6:
comment for Type is improved [Sean Paul]
v7:
%s/HDCP_2_2_LPRIME_HALF_LEN/HDCP_2_2_V_PRIME_HALF_LEN [Uma]
%s/uintxx_t/uxx
v8:
%s/eceiver_id/receiver_id
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1540806351-7137-5-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com
Considering significant number of HDCP specific variables, it will
be clean to have separate struct for HDCP.
New structure called intel_hdcp is added within intel_connector.
v2:
struct hdcp statically allocated. [Sean Paul]
enable and disable function parameters are retained.[Sean Paul]
v3:
No Changes.
v4:
Commit msg is rephrased [Uma]
v5:
Comment for mutex definition.
v6:
hdcp_ prefix from all intel_hdcp members are removed [Sean Paul]
inline function intel_hdcp_to_connector is defined [Sean Paul]
v7:
%s/uint64_t/u64
v8:
Rebased
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1540806351-7137-2-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com
BOE panel (ID: 0x0771) that reports "DFP 1.x compliant TMDS".
But it's 6bpc panel only instead of 8 bpc.
Add panel ID to edid quirk list and set 6 bpc as default to
work around this issue.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee, Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1540792173-7288-1-git-send-email-shawn.c.lee@intel.com
Currently send_msg_to_smc_async() only report which message
failed, but the actual failing message is the previous one,
which SMU is unable to service.
This patch reads the contents of register where the SMU is stuck
and report appropriately.
v2: fix the build (Alex)
Signed-off-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Problem: After GPU reset on dGPUs with gfx8 compute ring
1.0.0 fails to pass the ring test. Ring registers inspection
shows that it's active and no hang is observed (rptr == wptr)
No significant diffs were observed between CP_HQD* registers
for the ring in good and bad shape.
Fix: No clear reason why but reversing the order of ring tests
fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Make sure we don't try to go down further after the leave walk already
ended. This fixes a crash with a new VM test.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tested-by: Rex Zhu Rex.Zhu@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use the live_test struct to record the reset count before and compare it
at the end of the test to assert that no mystery hang occurred during the
test.
v2: Check per-engine resets as well
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181012122404.10874-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Upcoming GuC code will need to read the fused off engine masks as well,
and will also want to have them as enabled instead of disabled masks.
To consolidate the read-out place we can store them in this fashion inside
INTEL_INFO so they can be easily referenced in the future.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181018104106.30147-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
