The irq_set_affinity handler for the mn10300 cpu pic had some hard-coded IRQs
which were not to be migrated from one cpu to another. This patch cleans those
up by using a combination of IRQF_NOBALANCING and specialized irq chips with
no irq_set_affinity handler. This maintains the previous behavior by using
generic IRQ interfaces rather than hard coding IRQ numbers in the default
irq_set_affinity handler.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Use memory barriers correctly in the circular buffer logic used in the driver,
as documented in Documentation/circular-buffers.txt.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
the first one is equal to signal_pt_regs(), the second is never used
(and always NULL, while we are at it).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Always equal to task_pt_regs(current); defined only when we are in
signal delivery. It may be different from current_pt_regs() - e.g.
architectures like m68k may have pt_regs location on exception
different from that on a syscall and signals (just as ptrace handling)
may happen on exceptions as well as on syscalls.
When they are equal, it's often better to have signal_pt_regs
defined (in asm/ptrace.h) as current_pt_regs - that tends to be
optimized better than default would be. However, optimisation is
the only reason why we might want an arch-specific definition;
if current_pt_regs() and task_pt_regs(current) have different
values, the latter one is right.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and get rid of idiotic struct pt_regs * in asm-generic/syscalls.h
prototypes of the same, while we are at it. Eventually we want those
in linux/syscalls.h, of course, but that'll have to wait a bit.
Note that there are *three* variants of sys_clone() order of arguments.
Braindamage galore...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
* no need to restore everything from switch_stack when we only need $26
* no need to pass current_pt_regs() manually, we can just as easily
calculate it in alpha_clone/alpha_vfork ($8 + constant)
* interpretation of zero usp as "use the parent's" is simpler in copy_thread();
let fork and vfork just pass 0.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
incidentally, declaring a local variable as __user (!) to make
sparse STFU is really sick. Especially since sparse had been
100% right - it *is* a bug.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
