See also commit from 2009-08-15
"drbd_uuid_compare(): Do not full sync in case a P_SYNC_UUID packet gets lost."
We saw cases where the History UUIDs where not as expected. So the
detection of the special case did not trigger. With the sync UUID
no longer being a random number, but deducible from the previous
bitmap UUID, the detection of this special case becomes more
reliable.
The SyncUUID now is the previous bitmap UUID + 0x1000000000000.
Rule 5a:
Cs = H1p & H1p + Offset = Bp
Connection was lost before SyncUUID Packet came through.
Corrent (peer) UUIDs:
Bp = H1p
H1p = H2p
H2p = 0
Become Sync target.
Rule 7a:
Cp = H1s & H1s + Offset = Bs
Connection was lost before SyncUUID Packet came through.
Correct (own) UUIDs:
Bs = H1s
H1s = H2s
H2s = 0
Become Sync source.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Besides removed a few lines of code, this moves the inspection
of the state from before the queuing process to after the queuing.
I.e. more closely to the actual invocation of the work.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We may not get from SyncSource to Ahead if we have sent some
P_RS_DATA_REPLY packets to the peer and are waiting for
P_WRITE_ACK.
Again, this is not relevant for proper tuned systems, but makes
sure that the not-tuned system does not get diverging bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
When the sync source node replies to a P_RS_DATA_REQUEST packet
when it is already in ahead mode. I.e. those two packets
crossed each other on the wire, that may lead to diverging
bitmaps.
This never happens in a well-tuned-system. In a well-tuned-
system the resync controller has reduced the resync speed
to zero long before we got into ahead-mode.
But we have to be prepared for the not-well-tuned-system
of course as well.
Because -> diverging bitmaps = non terminating resync.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Create a new barrier when leaving the AHEAD mode.
Otherwise we trigger the assertion in req_mod(, barrier_acked)
D_ASSERT(req->rq_state & RQ_NET_SENT);
The new barrier is created by recycling the newest existing one.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
When on-no-data-accessible is set to suspend-io, also consider that
a Primary, SyncTarget node losses its connection.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
I run into something declaring itself as "spinlock deadlock",
BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#1, kjournald/27816, ffff88000ad6bca0
Pid: 27816, comm: kjournald Tainted: G W 2.6.34.6 #2
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff811ba0aa>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x11e/0x14d
[<ffffffff81340fde>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6a/0x81
[<ffffffff8103b694>] ? __wake_up+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff8103b694>] __wake_up+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffffa07ff661>] bm_async_io_complete+0x258/0x299 [drbd]
but the call traces do not fit at all,
all other cpus are cpu_idle.
I think it may be this race:
drbd_bm_write_page
wait_queue_head_t io_wait;
atomic_t in_flight;
bm_async_io
submit_bio
bm_async_io_complete
if (atomic_dec_and_test(in_flight))
wait_event(io_wait,
atomic_read(in_flight) == 0)
return
wake_up(io_wait)
The wake_up now accesses the wait_queue_head_t spinlock, which is no
longer valid, since the stack frame of drbd_bm_write_page has been
clobbered now.
Fix this by using struct completion, which does both the condition test
as well as the wake_up inside its spinlock, so this race cannot happen.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Even though we now track the need for bitmap writeout per bitmap page,
there is no need to trigger the writeout while a resync is going on.
Once the resync is finished (or aborted),
we trigger bitmap writeout anyways.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We expect changes to a bitmap page in drbd_bm_write_page,
that's why we submit a copy page.
If a page changes during global writeout, that would be unexpected,
and reason to warn, though.
Also, often page writeout can be skipped (on activity log transactions
during normal operation, for example), no need to log that everytime.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To improve the latency of IO requests during bitmap exchange,
we recently allowed writes while waiting for the bitmap, sending "set
out-of-sync" information packets for any newly dirtied bits.
We have to make sure that the new resync-uuid does not overtake
these "set oos" packets. Once the resync-uuid is received, the
sync target starts the resync process, and expects the bitmap to
only be cleared, not re-set.
If we use this protocol extension, we queue the generation and sending
of the resync-uuid on the worker, which naturally serializes with all
previously queued packets.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We expect to only receive the recently introduced "set out of sync"
packets in specific states. If we receive them in different states, that
may confuse the resync process to the point where it won't terminate, or
think it made negative progress.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
If drbd used to have crypto digest algorithms configured, then is being
unconfigured (but not unloaded), it frees the algorithms, but does not
reset the config. If it then is reconfigured to use the very same
algorithm, it "forgot" to re-allocate the algorithms, thinking that the
config has not changed in that aspect.
It will then Oops on the first attempt to actually use those algorithms.
Fix this by resetting the config to defaults after cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We must not call it directly from resync_finished,
as we may be in either receiver or worker context there.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Long time ago, we had paranoia code in the bitmap that allocated one
extra word, assigned a magic value, and checked on every occasion that
the magic value was still unchanged.
That debug code is unused, the extra long word complicates code a bit.
Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
When we set or clear bits in a bitmap page,
also set a flag in the page->private pointer.
This allows us to skip writes of unchanged pages.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Our on-disk bitmap is a little endian bitstream.
Up to now, we have stored the in-core copy of that in
native endian, applying byte order conversion when necessary.
Instead, keep the bitmap pages little endian, as they are read from disk,
and use the generic_*_le_bit family of functions.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
We trusted the on-disk bitmap to have unused bits cleared.
In case that is not true for whatever reason,
and we take a code path where the unused bits don't get cleared
elsewhere (bm_clear_surplus is not called), we may miscount the bits,
and get confused during resync, waiting for bits to get cleared that we
don't even use: the resync process would not terminate.
Fix this by masking out unused bits in __bm_count_bits.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
The old name is confusing: the function does not increment anything.
Also rename _inc_ap_bio_cond to inc_ap_bio_cond: there is no need for
an underscore.
Finally, make it clear that these functions return boolean values.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
I guess bitmap I/O errors are supposed to cause drbd_determin_dev_size
to return dev_size_error.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Warning: comparison between ‘enum drbd_ret_code’ and ‘enum drbd_state_rv’
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
The FAULT_ACTIVE macro just wraps the drbd_insert_fault macro for no
apparent reason.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
This macro doesn't save much code, but makes things a lot harder to read.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
commit e2041475e6ddb081734d161f6421977323f5a9b9
drbd: Starting with protocol 96 we can allow app-IO while receiving the bitmap
Contained a bad chunk that tried to optimize away drbd barriers during
bitmap exchange, but accidentally dropped them for normal mode as well.
Impact: depending on activity log size and access pattern, activity log
extents may not be recycled in time, causeing IO to block indefinetely.
Fix: skip drbd barriers only if there is no connection to send them on,
or the request being completed has not been on the network at all.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
As the network connection can be lost at any time, a --force option
for disconnect is just a matter of completeness.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
In case we ever should add an other packet type,
we must not reuse 27, as that currently used for
"empty" return code only replies.
Document it as such.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
