Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shu Wang
6818caa4cd xfs: fix memory leak in xfs_iext_free_last_leaf
found the issue by kmemleak.
unreferenced object 0xffff8800674611c0 (size 16):
    xfs_iext_insert+0x82a/0xa90 [xfs]
    xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay+0x1e5/0x5b0 [xfs]
    xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc+0x483/0x530 [xfs]
    xfs_file_iomap_begin+0xac8/0xd40 [xfs]
    iomap_apply+0xb8/0x1b0
    iomap_file_buffered_write+0xac/0xe0
    xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x198/0x420 [xfs]
    xfs_file_write_iter+0x23f/0x2a0 [xfs]
    __vfs_write+0x23e/0x340
    vfs_write+0xe9/0x240
    SyS_write+0xa1/0x120
    do_syscall_64+0xda/0x260

Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-21 01:44:53 -08:00
Darrick J. Wong
2015a63dce xfs: fix type usage
Be consistent about using uint32_t/uint8_t instead of u32/u8.  This is
more so that we don't have to maintain /those/ types in xfsprogs.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
2017-11-16 12:06:45 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
ae82968ee9 xfs: handle zero entries case in xfs_iext_rebalance_leaf
And also rename fill to nr_entries to match the rest of the code.

Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-09 14:08:54 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
3e27c418a7 xfs: add comments documenting the rebalance algorithm
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-09 14:08:54 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
b9aee1d5fe xfs: trivial indentation fixup for xfs_iext_remove_node
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-09 14:08:54 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
f1be313697 xfs: remove a superflous assignment in xfs_iext_remove_node
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-09 14:08:54 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
fc258f4b8b xfs: add some comments to xfs_iext_insert/xfs_iext_insert_node
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-09 14:08:53 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
43d193aa02 xfs: fix number of records handling in xfs_iext_split_leaf
Fix to check the correct value, and remove a duplicate handling of the
uneven record number split algorith,

Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-09 14:08:53 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
c38ccf5990 xfs: remove the nr_extents argument to xfs_iext_remove
We only have two places that remove 2 extents at the same time, so unroll
the loop there.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-06 11:53:41 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
0254c2f253 xfs: remove the nr_extents argument to xfs_iext_insert
We only have two places that insert 2 extents at the same time, so unroll
the loop there.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-06 11:53:41 -08:00
Christoph Hellwig
6bdcf26ade xfs: use a b+tree for the in-core extent list
Replace the current linear list and the indirection array for the in-core
extent list with a b+tree to avoid the need for larger memory allocations
for the indirection array when lots of extents are present.  The current
extent list implementations leads to heavy pressure on the memory
allocator when modifying files with a high extent count, and can lead
to high latencies because of that.

The replacement is a b+tree with a few quirks.  The leaf nodes directly
store the extent record in two u64 values.  The encoding is a little bit
different from the existing in-core extent records so that the start
offset and length which are required for lookups can be retreived with
simple mask operations.  The inner nodes store a 64-bit key containing
the start offset in the first half of the node, and the pointers to the
next lower level in the second half.  In either case we walk the node
from the beginninig to the end and do a linear search, as that is more
efficient for the low number of cache lines touched during a search
(2 for the inner nodes, 4 for the leaf nodes) than a binary search.
We store termination markers (zero length for the leaf nodes, an
otherwise impossible high bit for the inner nodes) to terminate the key
list / records instead of storing a count to use the available cache
lines as efficiently as possible.

One quirk of the algorithm is that while we normally split a node half and
half like usual btree implementations we just spill over entries added at
the very end of the list to a new node on its own.  This means we get a
100% fill grade for the common cases of bulk insertion when reading an
inode into memory, and when only sequentially appending to a file.  The
downside is a slightly higher chance of splits on the first random
insertions.

Both insert and removal manually recurse into the lower levels, but
the bulk deletion of the whole tree is still implemented as a recursive
function call, although one limited by the overall depth and with very
little stack usage in every iteration.

For the first few extents we dynamically grow the list from a single
extent to the next powers of two until we have a first full leaf block
and that building the actual tree.

The code started out based on the generic lib/btree.c code from Joern
Engel based on earlier work from Peter Zijlstra, but has since been
rewritten beyond recognition.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2017-11-06 11:53:41 -08:00