John Johansen
6e0654d20e
apparmor: use the dfa to do label parse string splitting
...
The current split scheme is actually wrong in that it splits
///&
where that is invalid and should fail. Use the dfa to do a proper
bounded split without having to worry about getting the string
processing right in code.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
2018-02-09 11:30:01 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
26064dea2d
+ Cleanups
...
- apparmor: fix spelling mistake: "resoure" -> "resource"
- apparmor: remove unused redundant variable stop
- apparmor: Fix bool initialization/comparison
+ Bug Fixes
- apparmor: initialized returned struct aa_perms
- apparmor: fix leak of null profile name if profile allocation fails
- apparmor: ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail
- apparmor: fix profile attachment for special unconfined profiles
- apparmor: fix locking when creating a new complain profile.
- apparmor: fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xeyB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'apparmor-pr-2017-11-21' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor
Pull apparmor updates from John Johansen:
"No features this time, just minor cleanups and bug fixes.
Cleanups:
- fix spelling mistake: "resoure" -> "resource"
- remove unused redundant variable stop
- Fix bool initialization/comparison
Bug Fixes:
- initialized returned struct aa_perms
- fix leak of null profile name if profile allocation fails
- ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail
- fix profile attachment for special unconfined profiles
- fix locking when creating a new complain profile.
- fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns"
* tag 'apparmor-pr-2017-11-21' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor:
apparmor: fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns
apparmor: fix locking when creating a new complain profile.
apparmor: fix profile attachment for special unconfined profiles
apparmor: ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail
apparmor: fix leak of null profile name if profile allocation fails
apparmor: remove unused redundant variable stop
apparmor: Fix bool initialization/comparison
apparmor: initialized returned struct aa_perms
apparmor: fix spelling mistake: "resoure" -> "resource"
2017-11-23 20:48:26 -10:00
John Johansen
feb3c766a3
apparmor: fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns
...
Use mutex_lock_nested to provide lockdep the parent child lock ordering of
the tree.
This fixes the lockdep Warning
[ 305.275177] ============================================
[ 305.275178] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 305.275179] 4.14.0-rc7+ #320 Not tainted
[ 305.275180] --------------------------------------------
[ 305.275181] apparmor_parser/1339 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 305.275182] (&ns->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff970544dd>] __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275187]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 305.275187] (&ns->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff97054b5d>] aa_prepare_ns+0x3d/0xd0
[ 305.275190]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 305.275191] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 305.275192] CPU0
[ 305.275193] ----
[ 305.275193] lock(&ns->lock);
[ 305.275194] lock(&ns->lock);
[ 305.275195]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 305.275196] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 305.275198] 2 locks held by apparmor_parser/1339:
[ 305.275198] #0 : (sb_writers#10){.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff96e9c6b7>] vfs_write+0x1a7/0x1d0
[ 305.275202] #1 : (&ns->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff97054b5d>] aa_prepare_ns+0x3d/0xd0
[ 305.275205]
stack backtrace:
[ 305.275207] CPU: 1 PID: 1339 Comm: apparmor_parser Not tainted 4.14.0-rc7+ #320
[ 305.275208] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 305.275209] Call Trace:
[ 305.275212] dump_stack+0x85/0xcb
[ 305.275214] __lock_acquire+0x141c/0x1460
[ 305.275216] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275218] ? ___slab_alloc+0x183/0x540
[ 305.275219] ? ___slab_alloc+0x183/0x540
[ 305.275221] lock_acquire+0xed/0x1e0
[ 305.275223] ? lock_acquire+0xed/0x1e0
[ 305.275224] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275227] __mutex_lock+0x89/0x920
[ 305.275228] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275230] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11f/0x190
[ 305.275231] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275233] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x57/0x1d0
[ 305.275234] ? lockdep_init_map+0x9/0x10
[ 305.275236] ? __rwlock_init+0x32/0x60
[ 305.275238] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[ 305.275240] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[ 305.275241] __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275243] aa_prepare_ns+0xc2/0xd0
[ 305.275245] aa_replace_profiles+0x168/0xf30
[ 305.275247] ? __might_fault+0x85/0x90
[ 305.275250] policy_update+0xb9/0x380
[ 305.275252] profile_load+0x7e/0x90
[ 305.275254] __vfs_write+0x28/0x150
[ 305.275256] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x72/0x80
[ 305.275257] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2f/0x60
[ 305.275259] ? __sb_start_write+0xdc/0x1c0
[ 305.275261] ? vfs_write+0x1a7/0x1d0
[ 305.275262] vfs_write+0xca/0x1d0
[ 305.275264] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11f/0x190
[ 305.275266] SyS_write+0x49/0xa0
[ 305.275268] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2
[ 305.275271] RIP: 0033:0x7fa6b22e8c74
[ 305.275272] RSP: 002b:00007ffeaaee6288 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 305.275273] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffeaaee62a4 RCX: 00007fa6b22e8c74
[ 305.275274] RDX: 0000000000000a51 RSI: 00005566a8198c10 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 305.275275] RBP: 0000000000000a39 R08: 0000000000000a51 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 305.275276] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005566a8198c10
[ 305.275277] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00005566a72ecb88 R15: 00005566a72ec3a8
Fixes: 73688d1ed0
2017-11-21 02:17:16 -08:00
Will Deacon
26c4eb192c
locking/rwsem, security/apparmor: Replace homebrew use of write_can_lock() with lockdep
...
The lockdep subsystem provides a robust way to assert that a lock is
held, so use that instead of write_can_lock, which can give incorrect
results for qrwlocks.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10 11:50:17 +02:00
John Johansen
bc4d82fb94
apparmor: fix incorrect type assignment when freeing proxies
...
sparse reports
poisoning the proxy->label before freeing the struct is resulting in
a sparse build warning.
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: expected struct aa_label [noderef] <asn:4>*label
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: got struct aa_label *<noident>
fix with RCU_INIT_POINTER as this is one of those cases where
rcu_assign_pointer() is not needed.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2017-09-22 13:00:58 -07:00
John Johansen
26b7899510
apparmor: add support for absolute root view based labels
...
With apparmor policy virtualization based on policy namespace View's
we don't generally want/need absolute root based views, however there
are cases like debugging and some secid based conversions where
using a root based view is important.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
2017-09-22 13:00:58 -07:00
John Johansen
f872af75d3
apparmor: cleanup conditional check for label in label_print
...
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
2017-09-22 13:00:57 -07:00
John Johansen
c5561700c9
apparmor: Redundant condition: prev_ns. in [label.c:1498]
...
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2017-09-22 13:00:57 -07:00
John Johansen
f1bd904175
apparmor: add the base fns() for domain labels
...
Begin moving apparmor to using broader domain labels, that will allow
run time computation of domain type splitting via "stacking" of
profiles into a domain label vec.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2017-06-10 17:11:38 -07:00
