The call to pci_for_each_dma_alias() in the ITS PCI code has aroused
suspicion in the past, and upon closer inspection does turn out to be
completely backwards. Rather than iterating through each RID alias of
the given device, what we actually want to be doing here is iterating
through all the *other* devices which may also alias the same RID, in
order to size the table for the worst case.
Do the right thing by ignoring the initial DMA aliases themselves and
just using that walk to detect an aliasing bridge, then walking back
down the bus topology as necessary to actually count everything else.
Our alias handling still isn't perfect, since we don't account for the
cases of certain bridges only taking ownership of transactions under
particular circumstances, but without completely reworking the ITS code
to cope with the notion of multiple DevIDs per device, it'll have to do.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Let ACPI build ITS PCI MSI domain. ACPI code is responsible for retrieving
inner domain token and passing it on to its_pci_msi_init_one generic
init call.
IORT maintains list of registered domain tokens and allows to find
corresponding domain based on MADT ITS subtable ID info.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Firmware agnostic code lands in common functions which do necessary
domain initialization based on unique domain handler. DT specific
code goes to DT specific init call.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Replace open coded generation PCI/MSI requester id with call to the
new function pci_msi_domain_get_msi_rid() which applies the "msi-map"
to the id value.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
As we continue to push of_node towards the outskirts of irq domains,
let's start tackling the case of msi_create_irq_domain and its little
friends.
This has limited impact in both PCI/MSI, platform MSI, and a few
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>
Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-17-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
When configuring the interrupt mapping for a new device, we
iterate over all the possible aliases to account for their
maximum MSI allocation. This was introduced by e8137f4f50
("irqchip: gicv3-its: Iterate over PCI aliases to generate ITS configuration").
Turns out that the code doing that is a bit braindead, and repeatedly
accounts for the same device over and over.
Fix this by counting the actual alias that is passed to us by the
core code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443800646-8074-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We can now lookup the base ITS domain, making it possible to
initialize the PCI/MSI code independently from the main ITS
subsystem.
This allows us to remove all the previously add hooks.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438091186-10244-15-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
It is becoming obvious that having the PCI/MSI code in the same
file as the the core ITS code is giving people implementing non-PCI
MSI support the wrong kind of idea.
In order to make things a bit clearer, let's move the PCI/MSI code
out to its own file. Hopefully it will make it clear that whoever
thinks of hooking into the core ITS better have a very strong point.
We use a temporary entry point that will get removed in a subsequent
patch, once the proper infrastructure is added.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438091186-10244-12-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
