Sometimes platform/bridge drivers need to be notified when a control from
a sub-device changes value. In order to support this a notify callback was
added.
[dheitmueller@kernellabs.com: fix merge conflict in v4l2-ctrls.c]
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
v4l2-compliance found problems with frequency clamping that wasn't
reported correctly and missing tuner index checks.
Also removed unnecessary tuner type checks (these are now done by the
v4l2 core).
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Radio devices should not implement those ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The ir-i2c-kbd already adds I2C IR before the name. The way it is,
the devices are named as:
"i2c IR (i2c IR (EM2840 Hauppaug"
With is ugly and incorrect. After this patch, it is now properly
displayed as:
"i2c IR (WinTV USB2)"
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
If the device has an I2C IR, em28xx-rc should be loaded by default,
except if the user explicitly requested to not load, via modprobe
option.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The em28xx-input is used by 3 different types of input devices:
- devices with buttons (like cameras and grabber devices);
- devices with I2C remotes;
- em2860 or latter chips with RC support embedded.
When the device has an I2C remote, all it needs to do is to call
the proper I2C driver (ir-i2c-kbd), passing the proper data to
it, and just leave the code.
Also, button devices have its own init code that doesn't depend on
having an IR or not (as a general rule, they don't have).
So, move its init code to fix bugs introduced by earlier patches
that prevent them to work.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
The separation the lmedm04 fails on the ts2020 portion because the correct
I2C addressing.
So, it's time to correct the addressing in the remainder of lmedm04.
Tested all tuners.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This situation is not even an error condition so it's stupid to BUG_ON.
Learn the lesson:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1347333
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Tuner part of Montage rs2000 chip is similar to ts2020 tuner.
Patch to use ts2020 code.
[mchehab@redhat.com: a few CodingStyle fixes]
Signed-off-by: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
TeVii s660 and others have LED for lock indication.
Let's use it in right order.
Signed-off-by: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Patch to select rs2000 module to compile automatically for TeVii
S421 and S632 cards.
Signed-off-by: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Most of *_ops and other structures in vivi.c were already declared const
but some have not. Constify and code/data will take less space:
$ size drivers/media/platform/vivi.o
text data bss dec hex filename
before: 12569 248 8 12825 3219 drivers/media/platform/vivi.o
after: 12308 20 8 12336 3030 drivers/media/platform/vivi.o
i.e. vivi.o is now ~500 bytes less.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@navytux.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This patch creates a new usb-radio driver, radio-ma901.c, that supports
Masterkit MA 901 USB FM radio devices. This device plugs into both the
USB and an analog audio input or headphones, so this thing only deals
with initialization and frequency setting.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Select is evil as it has issues with dependencies. Better to convert
it to use depends on.
That fixes a breakage with out-of-tree compilation of the media
tree.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Smatch complainst that the call to mantis_evmgr_exit() dereferences "ca"
but then we check it for NULL on the next line. I've moved the NULL
check forward to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
One register needs to be changed to TS to work. So we use separate inittab.
Signed-off-by: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Acked-by: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
DVB-S chip is Montage m88rs2000, so initial patch is simple.
Signed-off-by: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
- if kmalloc() returns NULL, we can return immediately without trying
to kfree() a NULL pointer.
- if i2c_transfer() fails, error out immediately instead of trying to
upload the remaining bytes of the firmware.
- the error code is then properly propagated down to ds3000_initfe().
Signed-off-by: Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@smartjog.com>
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Since we have now 3 modes (auto/isoc/bulk), usb_xfer_mode is more suitable than prefer_bulk.
Signed-off-by: Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c: In function 'ts2020_set_params':
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c:126:47: warning: variable 'div4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c: At top level:
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c:262:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ts2020_get_signal_strength' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Cc: Konstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Cc: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
make the other drivers take use of the separate ts2020 driver
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
remove ts2020 tuner related code from ds3000 driver
prepare ds3000 driver for using external tuner driver
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
There is no point in PTR_ERR()ing a NULL pointer, use a real error
instead.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
