The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to
create an explicit function to reverse the operation.
We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't
return anything.
In order to be less confusing, and easier to use for downstream users,
change the function name to something hopefully clearer, and return the
adjusted rate instead of changing the pointer.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
The clocks might need to modify their parent clocks. In order to make that
possible, give them access to the parent clock being evaluated, and to a
pointer to the parent rate so that they can modify it if needed.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Some PLL clocks are N (multiplier) type clocks, or can be simplified
as such. An example of the former is the DDR1 PLL clock on the A33.
An example of the latter is the CPU PLL clock on the A80, in which
the P divider is only used for low frequencies that are of little
use. Both clocks support PLL lock detection.
The mult clock macro implies support for this, but that is not true.
The field is simply discarded. This patch adds proper support for it.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Some multipliers have a maximum rate that is lower than what the register
width allows to. Add a field in the multiplier structure to allow CCU
driver to set that maximum.
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
The previous code was always taking 1 as the minimum in it's round_rate
function, ignoring entirely what was set as minimum in the clock
definition.
Make sure that's not the case anymore.
Fixes: 2beaa601c8 ("clk: sunxi-ng: Implement minimum for multipliers")
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
The factors we've seen so far all had an offset of one. However, on the
earlier Allwinner SoCs, some factors could have no offset at all, meaning
that the value computed to reach the rate we want to use was the one we had
to program in the registers.
Implement an additional field for the factors that can have such an offset
(linears, not based on a power of two) to specify that offset.
This offset is not linked to the extremums that can be specified in those
structures too. The minimum and maximum are representing the range of
values we can use to try to compute the best rate. The offset comes later
on when we want to set the best value in the registers.
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Some clocks on the earlier SoCs such as the video PLLs are multipliers with
fractional settings.
Support those cases.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Allow the CCU drivers to specify a multiplier for their clocks.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Modify the current clocks we have to be able to specify the minimum for
each clocks we support, just like we support the max.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Some clocks still use an explicit list of arguments, which make it a bit
more tedious to add new parameters.
Convert those over to a structure pointer argument to add as many
arguments as possible without having to many noise in our patches, or a
very long list of arguments.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Add support for the class with a single factor, N, being a multiplier.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
