When we start communicating with the pmu a bit more, the current code is
a real issue. I encountered a dead lock here, while testing my dynamic
reclocking code
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
the macro deals with target specific differences and so we should always use
this
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
on gk208+ we can simply mov 32bits, so we should have a single mov there
v2: use or operator instead of add
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVIDIA have indicated that the workaround is required on all GK10[467]
boards that have the PGOB fuse set.
I've left the commandline option in place for now, as paranoia.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
such cases by checking whether the pointer given to nvkm_pmu_pgob() is
valid.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Pretty much every subdev/engine is going to need access to nvkm_device
shortly to touch registers and/or output messages.
The odd placement of the includes is necessary to work around some
inter-dependencies that currently exist. This will be fixed later.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Will be utilised in upcoming commits to remove the need for heuristics
to lookup the device a subdev belongs to.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Only a handful of machines have this enabled by default, where it's been
proven to work. The workaround can be explicitly enabled with a module
option also.
Still waiting on feedback from NVIDIA for a proper idea of exactly what
this fix is doing, and how to implement it properly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Make static a few functions and structures that should be.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Before we moved gk110's implementation of this to pmu, the functions were
identical. This commit just switches GK208 to use the new (more complete)
implementation of the power-up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Switch to NVIDIA's name for the device.
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
