The call to set_machine_constraints() in regulator_register(), will
attempt to get the voltage for the regulator. If a regulator is in
bypass will fail to get the voltage (ie. it's bypass voltage) and
hence register the regulator, because the supply for the regulator has
not been resolved yet.
To fix this, add a call to regulator_resolve_supply() before we call
set_machine_constraints(). If the call to regulator_resolve_supply()
fails, rather than returning an error at this point, allow the
registration of the regulator to continue because for some regulators
resolving the supply at this point may not be necessary and it will be
resolved later as more regulators are added. Furthermore, if the supply
is still not resolved for a bypassed regulator, this will be detected
when we attempt to get the voltage for the regulator and an error will
be propagated at this point.
If a bypassed regulator does not have a supply when we attempt to get
the voltage, rather than returing -EINVAL, return -EPROBE_DEFER instead
to allow the registration of the regulator to be deferred and tried
again later.
Please note that regulator_resolve_supply() will call
regulator_dev_lookup() which may acquire the regulator_list_mutex. To
avoid any deadlocks we cannot hold the regulator_list_mutex when calling
regulator_resolve_supply(). Therefore, rather than holding the lock
around a large portion of the registration code, just hold the lock when
aquiring any GPIOs and setting up supplies because these sections may
add entries to the regulator_map_list and regulator_ena_gpio_list,
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To make the code more compat and centralized, this patch add a
unified function - regulator_ops_is_valid. So we can add
some extra checking code easily later.
Signed-off-by: WEN Pingbo <pingbo.wen@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The public functions to acquire a regulator, such as regulator_get(),
internally look-up the regulator from the list of regulators that have
been registered with the regulator device class. The registration of
a new regulator with the regulator device class happens before the
regulator has been completely setup. Therefore, it is possible that
the regulator could be acquired before it has been setup successfully.
To avoid this move the device registration of the regulator to the end
of the regulator setup and update the error exit path accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
During the resolution of a regulator's supply, we may attempt to enable
the supply if the regulator itself is already enabled. If enabling the
supply fails, then we will call _regulator_put() for the supply.
However, the pointer to the supply has not been cleared for the
regulator and this will cause a crash if we then unregister the
regulator and attempt to call regulator_put() a second time for the
supply. Fix this by clearing the supply pointer if enabling the supply
after fails when resolving the supply for a regulator.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The function regulator_register_resolve_supply() is called from the
context of class_for_each_dev() (during the regulator registration) to
resolve any supplies added. regulator_register_resolve_supply() will
return an error if a regulator's supply cannot be resolved and this will
terminate the loop in class_for_each_dev(). This means that we will not
attempt to resolve any other supplies after one has failed. Hence, this
may delay the resolution of other regulator supplies until the failing
one itself can be resolved.
Rather than terminating the loop early, don't return an error code and
keep attempting to resolve any other supplies for regulators that have
been registered.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
There are debugfs entries for voltage and current, but not for
the constraint flags. It's useful for debugging to be able to
see what these flags are so this patch adds a new debugfs file.
We can't use debugfs_create_bool for this because the flags are
bitfields, so as this needs a special read callback they have been
collected into a single file that lists all the flags.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
suspend_prepare can be called during regulator init time also, where
the mutex is not locked yet. This causes a false lockdep warning.
To avoid the problem, remove the lockdep assertion from the function
causing the issue. An alternative would be to lock the mutex during
init, but this would cause other problems (some APIs used during init
will attempt to lock the mutex also, causing deadlock.)
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When we acquire a shareable enable GPIO on probe we do so with the
regulator_list_mutex held. However when we release the GPIOs we do this
immediately after dropping the mutex meaning that the list could become
corrupted. Move the release into the locked region to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
device_register() is calling ->get_voltage() as part of it's sysfs attribute
initialization process, and this functions might need to know the regulator
constraints to return a valid value.
This is at least true for the pwm regulator driver (when operating in
continuous mode) which needs to know the minimum and maximum voltage values
to calculate the current voltage:
min_uV + (((max_uV - min_uV) * dutycycle) / 100);
Move device_register() after set_machine_constraints() to make sure those
constraints are correctly initialized when ->get_voltage() is called.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When a regulator is in bypass mode it is functioning as a switch
returning the voltage set in the regulator will not give the voltage
being output by the regulator as it's just passing through its supply.
This means that when we are getting the voltage from a regulator we
should check to see if it is in bypass mode and if it is we should
report the voltage from the supply rather than that which is set on the
regulator.
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[treding@nvidia.com: return early for bypass mode]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Commit 5e3ca2b349 ("regulator: Try to resolve regulators supplies on
registration") added a call to regulator_resolve_supply() within
regulator_register() where the regulator_list_mutex is held. This causes
a deadlock to occur on the Tegra114 Dalmore board when the palmas PMIC
is registered because regulator_register_resolve_supply() calls
regulator_dev_lookup() which may try to acquire the regulator_list_mutex
again.
Fix this by releasing the mutex before calling
regulator_register_resolve_supply() and update the error exit path to
ensure the mutex is released on an error.
[Made commit message more legible -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This aids in debugging problems triggered by the regulator core applying
its constraints, we could potentially crash immediately after updating
the voltage if the constraints are buggy.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Commit 6261b06de5 ("regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get")
moved the regulator supplies lookup logic from the regulators registration
to the regulators get time.
Unfortunately, that changed the behavior of the regulator core since now a
parent supply with a child regulator marked as always-on, won't be enabled
unless a client driver attempts to get the child regulator during boot.
This patch tries to resolve the parent supply for the already registered
regulators each time that a new regulator is registered. So the regulators
that have child regulators marked as always on will be enabled regardless
if a driver gets the child regulator or not.
That was the behavior before the mentioned commit, since parent supplies
were looked up at regulator registration time instead of during child get.
Since regulator_resolve_supply() checks for rdev->supply, most of the times
it will be a no-op. Errors aren't checked to keep the possible out of order
dependencies which was the motivation for the mentioned commit.
Also, the supply being available will be enforced on regulator get anyways
in case the resolve fails on regulators registration.
Fixes: 6261b06de5 ("regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get")
Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.1+
Currently we only attempt to set the voltage during constraints
application if an exact voltage is specified. Extend this so that if
the currently set voltage for the regulator is outside the bounds set in
constraints we will move the voltage to the nearest constraint, raising
to the minimum or lowering to the maximum as needed. This ensures that
drivers can probe without the hardware being driven out of spec.
Reported-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Apparently due to a wrongly resolved merge conflict between two
branches, which contained the same commit, the commit contents
partially was added two times in a row.
This change reverts the latter wrong inclusion of commit 909f7ee0b5
("regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration").
The first applied commit 670666b9e0 ("regulator: core: Add support
for active-discharge configuration") is not touched.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The regulator_resolve_supply() function checks if a supply has been
associated with a regulator to avoid enabling it if that is not the
case.
But the supply was already looked up with regulator_resolve_supply()
and set with set_supply() before the check and both return on error.
So the fact that this statement has been reached means that neither
of them failed and a supply must be associated with the regulator.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add support to enable/disable active discharge of regulator via
machine constraints. This configuration is done when setting
machine constraint during regulator register and if regulator
driver implemented the callback ops.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add support to enable/disable active discharge of regulator via
machine constraints. This configuration is done when setting
machine constraint during regulator register and if regulator
driver implemented the callback ops.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This problem was introduced by:
commit daad134d66 ("regulator: core: Request GPIO before creating
sysfs entries")
The error path was not updated correctly after moving GPIO registration
code and in case regulator_ena_gpio_free failed, device_unregister() was
called even though device_register() was not yet called.
This problem breaks the boot at least on all Tegra 32-bit devices. It
will also crash each device that specifices GPIO that is unavaiable at
regulator_register call. Here's error log I've got when forced GPIO to
be invalid:
[ 1.116612] usb-otg-vbus-reg: Failed to request enable GPIO10: -22
[ 1.122794] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 00000044
[ 1.130894] pgd = c0004000
[ 1.133598] [00000044] *pgd=00000000
[ 1.137205] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
and here's backtrace from KDB:
Exception stack(0xef11fbd0 to 0xef11fc18)
fbc0: 00000000 c0738a14 00000000 00000000
fbe0: c0b2a0b0 00000000 00000000 c0738a14 c0b5fdf8 00000001 ef7f6074 ef11fc4c
fc00: ef11fc50 ef11fc20 c02a8344 c02a7f1c 60000013 ffffffff
[<c010cee0>] (__dabt_svc) from [<c02a7f1c>] (kernfs_find_ns+0x18/0xf8)
[<c02a7f1c>] (kernfs_find_ns) from [<c02a8344>] (kernfs_find_and_get_ns+0x40/0x58)
[<c02a8344>] (kernfs_find_and_get_ns) from [<c02ac4a4>] (sysfs_unmerge_group+0x28/0x68)
[<c02ac4a4>] (sysfs_unmerge_group) from [<c044389c>] (dpm_sysfs_remove+0x30/0x5c)
[<c044389c>] (dpm_sysfs_remove) from [<c0436ba8>] (device_del+0x48/0x1f4)
[<c0436ba8>] (device_del) from [<c0436d84>] (device_unregister+0x30/0x6c)
[<c0436d84>] (device_unregister) from [<c0403910>] (regulator_register+0x6d0/0xdac)
[<c0403910>] (regulator_register) from [<c04052d4>] (devm_regulator_register+0x50/0x84)
[<c04052d4>] (devm_regulator_register) from [<c0406298>] (reg_fixed_voltage_probe+0x25c/0x3c0)
[<c0406298>] (reg_fixed_voltage_probe) from [<c043d21c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x60/0xb0)
[<c043d21c>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c043b078>] (driver_probe_device+0x24c/0x440)
[<c043b078>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c043b5e8>] (__device_attach_driver+0xc0/0x120)
[<c043b5e8>] (__device_attach_driver) from [<c043901c>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x6c/0x98)
[<c043901c>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c043ad20>] (__device_attach+0xac/0x138)
[<c043ad20>] (__device_attach) from [<c043b664>] (device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x20)
[<c043b664>] (device_initial_probe) from [<c043a074>] (bus_probe_device+0x94/0x9c)
[<c043a074>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c043a610>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x80/0xcc)
[<c043a610>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c01381d0>] (process_one_work+0x158/0x454)
[<c01381d0>] (process_one_work) from [<c013854c>] (worker_thread+0x38/0x510)
[<c013854c>] (worker_thread) from [<c013e154>] (kthread+0xe8/0x104)
[<c013e154>] (kthread) from [<c0108638>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski <krzysztof.adamski@tieto.com>
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
regulator_attr_is_visible (which is a .is_visible callback of
regulator_dev_group attribute_grpup) checks rdev->ena_pin to decide if
"status" file should be present in sysfs. This field is set at the end
of regulator_ena_gpio_request so it has to be called before
device_register() otherwise this test will always fail, causing "status"
file to not be visible.
Since regulator_attr_is_visible also tests for is_enabled() op, this
problem is only visible for regulators that does not define this
callback, like regulator-fixed.c.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski <krzysztof.adamski@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
As we now free the constraints in regulator_dev_release we will still
call free on the constraints pointer even if we went down an error
path in regulator_register, because it is only allocated after the
device_register. As such we no longer need to free rdev->constraints
on the error paths, so this patch removes said frees.
Fixes: 29f5f4860a ("regulator: core: Move more deallocation into class unregister")
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Originally queue_delayed_work() used to negative error codes or 0 and 1
on success depending if the work was queued or not. It caused a lot of
bugs where people treated all non-zero returns as failures so we changed
it to return bool instead in d4283e9378 ('workqueue: make queueing
functions return bool'). Now it never returns failure.
Checking for negative values causes a static checker warning since it is
impossible based on the bool type.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Commit fa731ac7ea ("regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
introduced a subtle change in how supplies are locked. Where previously
code was always locking the regulator of the current iteration, the new
implementation only locks the regulator if it has a supply. For any
given power tree that means that the root will never get locked.
On the other hand the regulator_unlock_supply() will still release all
the locks, which in turn causes the lock debugging code to warn about a
mutex being unlocked which wasn't locked.
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: Fixes: fa731ac7ea ("regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The latest workaround for the lockdep interface's not using the second
argument of mutex_lock_nested() changed the loop missed locking the last
regulator due to a thinko with the loop termination condition exiting
one regulator too soon.
Reported-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
As noticed by Geert Uytterhoeven, my patch to avoid a harmless build warning
in regulator_lock_supply() was total crap and introduced a real bug:
> [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> kworker/u4:0/6 is trying to release lock (&rdev->mutex) at:
> [<c0247b84>] regulator_set_voltage+0x38/0x50
we still lock the regulator supplies, but not the actual regulators,
so we are missing a lock, and the unlock is unbalanced.
This rectifies it by first locking the regulator device itself before
using the same loop as before to lock its supplies.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 716fec9d1965 ("[SUBMITTED] regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The second argument of the mutex_lock_nested() helper is only
evaluated if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set. Otherwise we
get this build warning for the new regulator_lock_supply
function:
drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply':
drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
To avoid the warning, this restructures the code to make it
both simpler and to move the 'i++' outside of the mutex_lock_nested
call, where it is now always used and the variable is not
flagged as unused.
We had some discussion about changing mutex_lock_nested to an
inline function, which would make the code do the right thing here,
but in the end decided against it, in order to guarantee that
mutex_lock_nested() does not introduced overhead without
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 9f01cd4a91 ("regulator: core: introduce function to lock regulators and its supplies")
Link: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2068900
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Make it possible to use the bulk API with optional supplies, by allowing
the consumer to marking supplies as optional in the regulator_bulk_data.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Since we need to read voltages of parents as part of setting supply
voltages we need to be able to do get_voltage() internally without
taking locks so reorganize the locking to take locks on the full tree on
entry rather than as we recurse when called externally.
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Until now changing the voltage of a regulator only ever effected the
regulator itself, but never its supplies. It's a common pattern though
to put LDO regulators behind switching regulators. The switching
regulators efficiently drop the input voltage but have a high ripple on
their output. The output is then cleaned up by the LDOs. For higher
energy efficiency the voltage drop at the LDOs should be minimized. For
this scenario we need to propagate the voltage change to the supply
regulators. Another scenario where voltage propagation is desired is
a regulator which only consists of a switch and thus cannot regulate
voltages itself. In this case we can pass setting voltages to the
supply.
This patch adds support for voltage propagation. We do voltage
propagation when the current regulator has a minimum dropout voltage
specified or if the current regulator lacks a get_voltage operation
(indicating it's a switch and not a regulator).
Changing the supply voltage must be done carefully. When we are
increasing the current regulators output we must first increase the
supply voltage and then the regulator itself. When we are decreasing the
current regulators voltage we must decrease the supply voltage after
changing the current regulators voltage.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
_regulator_call_set_voltage has code to translate a minimum/maximum
voltage pair into a selector. This code is useful for others aswell,
so create a regulator_map_voltage function.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The unlocked version will be needed when we start propagating voltage
changes to the supply regulators.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The unlocked version will be needed when we start propagating voltage
changes to the supply regulators.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Each regulator_dev is locked with its own mutex. This is fine as long
as only one regulator_dev is locked, but makes lockdep unhappy when we
have to walk up the supply chain like it can happen in
regulator_get_voltage:
regulator_get_voltage ->
mutex_lock(®ulator->rdev->mutex) ->
_regulator_get_voltage(regulator->rdev) ->
regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply) ->
mutex_lock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
This causes lockdep to issue a possible deadlock warning.
There are at least two ways to work around this:
- We can always lock the whole supply chain using the functions
introduced with this patch.
- We could store the current voltage in struct regulator_rdev so
that we do not have to walk up the supply chain for the
_regulator_get_voltage case.
Anyway, regulator_lock_supply/regulator_unlock_supply will be needed
once we allow regulator_set_voltage to optimize the supply voltages.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
