mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-27 18:55:08 +07:00
4cf5892495
7 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Greg Kroah-Hartman
|
b24413180f |
License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
||
Sudeep Holla
|
af391b15f7 |
arm64: kernel: rename __cpu_suspend to keep it aligned with arm
This patch renames __cpu_suspend to cpu_suspend so that it's aligned with ARM32. It also removes the redundant wrapper created. This is in preparation to implement generic PSCI system suspend using the cpu_{suspend,resume} which now has the same interface on both ARM and ARM64. Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
||
Daniel Lezcano
|
c9d6216149 |
ARM64: cpuidle: Rename cpu_init_idle to a common function name
With this change the cpuidle-arm64.c file calls the same function name for both ARM and ARM64. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> |
||
Daniel Lezcano
|
449e056c76 |
ARM: cpuidle: Add a cpuidle ops structure to be used for DT
The current state of the different cpuidle drivers is the different PM operations are passed via the platform_data using the platform driver paradigm. This approach allowed to split the low level PM code from the arch specific and the generic cpuidle code. Unfortunately there are complaints about this approach as, in the context of the single kernel image, we have multiple drivers loaded in memory for nothing and the platform driver is not adequate for cpuidle. This patch provides a common interface via cpuidle ops for all new cpuidle driver and a definition for the device tree. It will allow with the next patches to a have a common definition with ARM64 and share the same cpuidle driver. The code is optimized to use the __init section intensively in order to reduce the memory footprint after the driver is initialized and unify the function names with ARM64. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> |
||
Lorenzo Pieralisi
|
af4819af8d |
arm64: cpuidle: add asm/proc-fns.h inclusion
ARM64 CPUidle driver requires the cpu_do_idle function so that it can be used to enter the shallowest idle state, and it is declared in asm/proc-fns.h. The current ARM64 CPUidle driver does not include asm/proc-fns.h explicitly and it has so far relied on implicit inclusion from other header files. Owing to some header dependencies reshuffling this currently triggers build failures when CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y: drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c: In function "arm64_enter_idle_state" drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c:42:3: error: implicit declaration of function "cpu_do_idle" [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] cpu_do_idle(); ^ This patch adds the explicit inclusion of the asm/proc-fns.h header file in the arm64 asm/cpuidle.h header file, so that the build breakage is fixed and the required header inclusion is added to the appropriate arch back-end CPUidle header, already included by the CPUidle arm64 driver, where CPUidle arch related function declarations belong. Reported-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
||
Lorenzo Pieralisi
|
af3cfdbf56 |
arm64: kernel: remove ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option
ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option was introduced to make code providing context save/restore selectable only on platforms requiring power management capabilities. Currently ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND depends on the PM_SLEEP config option which in turn is set by the SUSPEND config option. The introduction of CPU_IDLE for arm64 requires that code configured by ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND (context save/restore) should be compiled in in order to enable the CPU idle driver to rely on CPU operations carrying out context save/restore. The ARM64_CPUIDLE config option (ARM64 generic idle driver) is therefore forced to select ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND, even if there may be (ie PM_SLEEP) failed dependencies, which is not a clean way of handling the kernel configuration option. For these reasons, this patch removes the ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND config option and makes the context save/restore dependent on CPU_PM, which is selected whenever either SUSPEND or CPU_IDLE are configured, cleaning up dependencies in the process. This way, code previously configured through ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND is compiled in whenever a power management subsystem requires it to be present in the kernel (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE), which is the behaviour expected on ARM64 kernels. The cpu_suspend and cpu_init_idle CPU operations are added only if CPU_IDLE is selected, since they are CPU_IDLE specific methods and should be grouped and defined accordingly. PSCI CPU operations are updated to reflect the introduced changes. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
||
Lorenzo Pieralisi
|
d64f84f696 |
arm64: kernel: introduce cpu_init_idle CPU operation
The CPUidle subsystem on ARM64 machines requires the idle states implementation back-end to initialize idle states parameter upon boot. This patch adds a hook in the CPU operations structure that should be initialized by the CPU operations back-end in order to provide a function that initializes cpu idle states. This patch also adds the infrastructure to arm64 kernel required to export the CPU operations based initialization interface, so that drivers (ie CPUidle) can use it when they are initialized at probe time. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |