The RTC range validation code can be factored into rtc_valid_range()
function to avoid duplicate code.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Add a way for drivers to inform the core of the supported date/time range.
The core can then check whether the date/time or alarm is in the range
before calling ->set_time, ->set_mmss or ->set_alarm. It returns -ERANGE
when the time is out of range.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Fix possible race condition.
It is not allowed to return with an error code after RTC is registered.
Suggested-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis Osterland <Denis.Osterland@diehl.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The interrupt handler got enabled very early. If the interrupt cause is
triggering immediately before the context is fully prepared. This can
lead to undefined behaviour. Therefor we move the interrupt enable code
to the end of the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Denis Osterland <Denis.Osterland@diehl.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Since accessing a Chrome OS EC based rtc is a slow operation, there is a
race window where if the alarm is set for the next second and the second
ticks over right before calculating the alarm offset.
In this case the current driver is setting a 0-second alarm, which would
be considered as disabling alarms by the EC(EC_RTC_ALARM_CLEAR).
This breaks, e.g., hwclock which relies on RTC_UIE_ON ->
rtc_update_irq_enable(), which sets a 1-second alarm and expects it to
fire an interrupt.
So return -ETIME when the alarm is in the past, follow __rtc_set_alarm().
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
In order to set time in rtc, need to disable
rtc hw before writing into rtc registers.
Also fixes disabling of alarm while setting
rtc time.
Signed-off-by: Mohit Aggarwal <maggarwa@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This config select's MFD_SYSCON, but does not depend on HAS_IOMEM.
Compile testing on architecture without HAS_IOMEM causes "unmet
direct dependencies" in Kconfig phase.
Detected by "make ARCH=score allyesconfig".
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The probe function must not fail after rtc_register_device. Also, rename
the nvmem device so it is easily identifiable in /sys/bus/nvmem.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The ISL12026 is a combination RTC and EEPROM device with I2C
interface. The standard RTC driver interface is provided. The EEPROM
is accessed via the NVMEM interface.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The HW default is one tick per second, however instead of assuming this,
lets make sure the waketimer is actually one tick per second before
arming the alarm.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The current correction for leap years will fail in 3477. 3476-12-31 being
3477-01-00 because this is 366 leap years after 1970 and 3477 isn't a leap
year.
Fix that by looping over until days is positive or zero.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This patch fixes a bug, that prevents the Allwinner A83T and the A80
from a successful boot.
The bug is there since v4.16-rc1 and appeared after the clk branch was
merged.
You can find the shortend trace below:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
pgd = (ptrval)
[00000000] *pgd=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 49 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-10190-gb89e32ccd1be #2
Hardware name: Allwinner sun8i Family
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
PC is at clk_hw_get_rate+0x0/0x34
LR is at ac100_clkout_determine_rate+0x48/0x19c
[ ... ]
(clk_hw_get_rate) from (ac100_clkout_determine_rate+0x48/0x19c)
(ac100_clkout_determine_rate) from (clk_core_set_rate_nolock+0x3c/0x1a0)
(clk_core_set_rate_nolock) from (clk_set_rate+0x30/0x88)
(clk_set_rate) from (of_clk_set_defaults+0x200/0x364)
(of_clk_set_defaults) from (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0xb0)
To fix that bug, we first check if the return of the
clk_hw_get_parent_by_index is non zero. If it is zero we skip that
clock parent.
The BUG report could be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/10/198
Fixes: 04940631b8 ("rtc: ac100: Add clk output support")
Signed-off-by: Philipp Rossak <embed3d@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
As per 8.2.6 Setting and reading the time in RTC mode, first stop the clok,
then reset it before setting the date and time registers. Finally, start
the clock.
This uses register address wrap around from 0x2f to 0x00 for efficiency.
This allows to set the clock with a millisecond accuracy (drift is not
corrected in this example):
RTC System
1325388767 1325388767.000029180
1325388768 1325388768.000018362
1325388769 1325388769.000006544
1325388770 1325388769.999992725
1325388771 1325388770.999974544
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
m41t80_get_datetime and m41t80_set_datetime are only used after casting dev
to an i2c_client. Remove that useless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Without CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M41T80_WDT the compiler complains:
|drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c:76 ‘m41t80_rtc_mutex’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
Move the variable to the block where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
pcf85063_get_datetime and pcf85063_set_datetime are only used after casting
dev to an i2c_client. Remove that useless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
max6900_i2c_read_time and max6900_i2c_set_time are only used after casting
dev to an i2c_client. Remove that useless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
rs5c372_get_datetime and rs5c372_set_datetime are only used after casting
dev to an i2c_client. Remove that useless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not necessary to print a message when the time is invalid as
userspace will already get an error (and an optional dev_dbg message).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
s35390a_set_datetime, s35390a_get_datetime, s35390a_set_alarm and
s35390a_read_alarm are only used after casting dev to an i2c_client. Remove
that useless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not necessary to print a message when the time is invalid as
userspace will already get an error (and an optional dev_dbg message).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The probe function is not allowed to fail after registering the RTC because
the following may happen:
CPU0: CPU1:
sys_load_module()
do_init_module()
do_one_initcall()
cmos_do_probe()
rtc_device_register()
__register_chrdev()
cdev->owner = struct module*
open("/dev/rtc0")
rtc_device_unregister()
module_put()
free_module()
module_free(mod->module_core)
/* struct module *module is now
freed */
chrdev_open()
spin_lock(cdev_lock)
cdev_get()
try_module_get()
module_is_live()
/* dereferences already
freed struct module* */
Switch to devm_rtc_allocate_device/rtc_register_device to register the rtc
as late as possible.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
At probe time, printing a message when the time is invalid doesn't have
much value. Also, as the comment suggest, this is a leftover from
development wherhe this was used to set the RTc to a default time.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not necessary to print a message when the time is invalid as
userspace will already get an error (and an optional dev_dbg message).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not necessary to print a message when the time is invalid as
userspace will already get an error (and an optional dev_dbg message).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not necessary to print a message when the time is invalid as
userspace will already get an error (and an optional dev_dbg message).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
It is not necessary to print a message when the time is invalid as
userspace will already get an error (and an optional dev_dbg message).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always validating the rtc_time struct before calling
.set_time. It is not necessary to do it again in .set_time.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always validating the rtc_time struct before calling
.set_time or .set_alarm. It is not necessary to do it again.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always validating the rtc_time struct before calling
.set_time or .set_alarm. It is not necessary to do it again.
Also, rtc_time_to_tm never generates an invalid rtc_tm (it can be out of
range though).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it just before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it just before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
isl12022_get_datetime and isl12022_set_datetime are only used after casting
dev to an i2c_client. Remove that useless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
rtc_time64_to_tm never generates an invalid tm. It is not necessary to
validate it. Also, the RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the
read_time callback.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it just before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it before returning from the callback.
Acked-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it just before returning from the callback.
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it just before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The RTC core is always calling rtc_valid_tm after the read_time callback.
It is not necessary to call it just before returning from the callback.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Returning a valid time when the time is invalid is a bad practice, because
then userspace is not able to react on the information. Also, it doesn't
make sense to return epoch because it is already the default time.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
