87 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Andrey Ignatov	41c48f3a98	bpf: Support access to bpf map fields ... There are multiple use-cases when it's convenient to have access to bpf map fields, both `struct bpf_map` and map type specific struct-s such as `struct bpf_array`, `struct bpf_htab`, etc. For example while working with sock arrays it can be necessary to calculate the key based on map->max_entries (some_hash % max_entries). Currently this is solved by communicating max_entries via "out-of-band" channel, e.g. via additional map with known key to get info about target map. That works, but is not very convenient and error-prone while working with many maps. In other cases necessary data is dynamic (i.e. unknown at loading time) and it's impossible to get it at all. For example while working with a hash table it can be convenient to know how much capacity is already used (bpf_htab.count.counter for BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC case). At the same time kernel knows this info and can provide it to bpf program. Fill this gap by adding support to access bpf map fields from bpf program for both `struct bpf_map` and map type specific fields. Support is implemented via btf_struct_access() so that a user can define their own `struct bpf_map` or map type specific struct in their program with only necessary fields and preserve_access_index attribute, cast a map to this struct and use a field. For example: struct bpf_map { __u32 max_entries; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); struct bpf_array { struct bpf_map map; __u32 elem_size; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); __uint(max_entries, 4); __type(key, __u32); __type(value, __u32); } m_array SEC(".maps"); SEC("cgroup_skb/egress") int cg_skb(void *ctx) { struct bpf_array *array = (struct bpf_array *)&m_array; struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *)&m_array; /* .. use map->max_entries or array->map.max_entries .. */ } Similarly to other btf_struct_access() use-cases (e.g. struct tcp_sock in net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c) the patch allows access to any fields of corresponding struct. Only reading from map fields is supported. For btf_struct_access() to work there should be a way to know btf id of a struct that corresponds to a map type. To get btf id there should be a way to get a stringified name of map-specific struct, such as "bpf_array", "bpf_htab", etc for a map type. Two new fields are added to `struct bpf_map_ops` to handle it: * .map_btf_name keeps a btf name of a struct returned by map_alloc(); * .map_btf_id is used to cache btf id of that struct. To make btf ids calculation cheaper they're calculated once while preparing btf_vmlinux and cached same way as it's done for btf_id field of `struct bpf_func_proto` While calculating btf ids, struct names are NOT checked for collision. Collisions will be checked as a part of the work to prepare btf ids used in verifier in compile time that should land soon. The only known collision for `struct bpf_htab` (kernel/bpf/hashtab.c vs net/core/sock_map.c) was fixed earlier. Both new fields .map_btf_name and .map_btf_id must be set for a map type for the feature to work. If neither is set for a map type, verifier will return ENOTSUPP on a try to access map_ptr of corresponding type. If just one of them set, it's verifier misconfiguration. Only `struct bpf_array` for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY and `struct bpf_htab` for BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH are supported by this patch. Other map types will be supported separately. The feature is available only for CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y and gated by perfmon_capable() so that unpriv programs won't have access to bpf map fields. Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6479686a0cd1e9067993df57b4c3eef0e276fec9.1592600985.git.rdna@fb.com	2020-06-22 22:22:58 +02:00
Andrii Nakryiko	457f44363a	bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it ... This commit adds a new MPSC ring buffer implementation into BPF ecosystem, which allows multiple CPUs to submit data to a single shared ring buffer. On the consumption side, only single consumer is assumed. Motivation ---------- There are two distinctive motivators for this work, which are not satisfied by existing perf buffer, which prompted creation of a new ring buffer implementation. - more efficient memory utilization by sharing ring buffer across CPUs; - preserving ordering of events that happen sequentially in time, even across multiple CPUs (e.g., fork/exec/exit events for a task). These two problems are independent, but perf buffer fails to satisfy both. Both are a result of a choice to have per-CPU perf ring buffer. Both can be also solved by having an MPSC implementation of ring buffer. The ordering problem could technically be solved for perf buffer with some in-kernel counting, but given the first one requires an MPSC buffer, the same solution would solve the second problem automatically. Semantics and APIs ------------------ Single ring buffer is presented to BPF programs as an instance of BPF map of type BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF. Two other alternatives considered, but ultimately rejected. One way would be to, similar to BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, make BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF could represent an array of ring buffers, but not enforce "same CPU only" rule. This would be more familiar interface compatible with existing perf buffer use in BPF, but would fail if application needed more advanced logic to lookup ring buffer by arbitrary key. HASH_OF_MAPS addresses this with current approach. Additionally, given the performance of BPF ringbuf, many use cases would just opt into a simple single ring buffer shared among all CPUs, for which current approach would be an overkill. Another approach could introduce a new concept, alongside BPF map, to represent generic "container" object, which doesn't necessarily have key/value interface with lookup/update/delete operations. This approach would add a lot of extra infrastructure that has to be built for observability and verifier support. It would also add another concept that BPF developers would have to familiarize themselves with, new syntax in libbpf, etc. But then would really provide no additional benefits over the approach of using a map. BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF doesn't support lookup/update/delete operations, but so doesn't few other map types (e.g., queue and stack; array doesn't support delete, etc). The approach chosen has an advantage of re-using existing BPF map infrastructure (introspection APIs in kernel, libbpf support, etc), being familiar concept (no need to teach users a new type of object in BPF program), and utilizing existing tooling (bpftool). For common scenario of using a single ring buffer for all CPUs, it's as simple and straightforward, as would be with a dedicated "container" object. On the other hand, by being a map, it can be combined with ARRAY_OF_MAPS and HASH_OF_MAPS map-in-maps to implement a wide variety of topologies, from one ring buffer for each CPU (e.g., as a replacement for perf buffer use cases), to a complicated application hashing/sharding of ring buffers (e.g., having a small pool of ring buffers with hashed task's tgid being a look up key to preserve order, but reduce contention). Key and value sizes are enforced to be zero. max_entries is used to specify the size of ring buffer and has to be a power of 2 value. There are a bunch of similarities between perf buffer (BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY) and new BPF ring buffer semantics: - variable-length records; - if there is no more space left in ring buffer, reservation fails, no blocking; - memory-mappable data area for user-space applications for ease of consumption and high performance; - epoll notifications for new incoming data; - but still the ability to do busy polling for new data to achieve the lowest latency, if necessary. BPF ringbuf provides two sets of APIs to BPF programs: - bpf_ringbuf_output() allows to *copy* data from one place to a ring buffer, similarly to bpf_perf_event_output(); - bpf_ringbuf_reserve()/bpf_ringbuf_commit()/bpf_ringbuf_discard() APIs split the whole process into two steps. First, a fixed amount of space is reserved. If successful, a pointer to a data inside ring buffer data area is returned, which BPF programs can use similarly to a data inside array/hash maps. Once ready, this piece of memory is either committed or discarded. Discard is similar to commit, but makes consumer ignore the record. bpf_ringbuf_output() has disadvantage of incurring extra memory copy, because record has to be prepared in some other place first. But it allows to submit records of the length that's not known to verifier beforehand. It also closely matches bpf_perf_event_output(), so will simplify migration significantly. bpf_ringbuf_reserve() avoids the extra copy of memory by providing a memory pointer directly to ring buffer memory. In a lot of cases records are larger than BPF stack space allows, so many programs have use extra per-CPU array as a temporary heap for preparing sample. bpf_ringbuf_reserve() avoid this needs completely. But in exchange, it only allows a known constant size of memory to be reserved, such that verifier can verify that BPF program can't access memory outside its reserved record space. bpf_ringbuf_output(), while slightly slower due to extra memory copy, covers some use cases that are not suitable for bpf_ringbuf_reserve(). The difference between commit and discard is very small. Discard just marks a record as discarded, and such records are supposed to be ignored by consumer code. Discard is useful for some advanced use-cases, such as ensuring all-or-nothing multi-record submission, or emulating temporary malloc()/free() within single BPF program invocation. Each reserved record is tracked by verifier through existing reference-tracking logic, similar to socket ref-tracking. It is thus impossible to reserve a record, but forget to submit (or discard) it. bpf_ringbuf_query() helper allows to query various properties of ring buffer. Currently 4 are supported: - BPF_RB_AVAIL_DATA returns amount of unconsumed data in ring buffer; - BPF_RB_RING_SIZE returns the size of ring buffer; - BPF_RB_CONS_POS/BPF_RB_PROD_POS returns current logical possition of consumer/producer, respectively. Returned values are momentarily snapshots of ring buffer state and could be off by the time helper returns, so this should be used only for debugging/reporting reasons or for implementing various heuristics, that take into account highly-changeable nature of some of those characteristics. One such heuristic might involve more fine-grained control over poll/epoll notifications about new data availability in ring buffer. Together with BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP/BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP flags for output/commit/discard helpers, it allows BPF program a high degree of control and, e.g., more efficient batched notifications. Default self-balancing strategy, though, should be adequate for most applications and will work reliable and efficiently already. Design and implementation ------------------------- This reserve/commit schema allows a natural way for multiple producers, either on different CPUs or even on the same CPU/in the same BPF program, to reserve independent records and work with them without blocking other producers. This means that if BPF program was interruped by another BPF program sharing the same ring buffer, they will both get a record reserved (provided there is enough space left) and can work with it and submit it independently. This applies to NMI context as well, except that due to using a spinlock during reservation, in NMI context, bpf_ringbuf_reserve() might fail to get a lock, in which case reservation will fail even if ring buffer is not full. The ring buffer itself internally is implemented as a power-of-2 sized circular buffer, with two logical and ever-increasing counters (which might wrap around on 32-bit architectures, that's not a problem): - consumer counter shows up to which logical position consumer consumed the data; - producer counter denotes amount of data reserved by all producers. Each time a record is reserved, producer that "owns" the record will successfully advance producer counter. At that point, data is still not yet ready to be consumed, though. Each record has 8 byte header, which contains the length of reserved record, as well as two extra bits: busy bit to denote that record is still being worked on, and discard bit, which might be set at commit time if record is discarded. In the latter case, consumer is supposed to skip the record and move on to the next one. Record header also encodes record's relative offset from the beginning of ring buffer data area (in pages). This allows bpf_ringbuf_commit()/bpf_ringbuf_discard() to accept only the pointer to the record itself, without requiring also the pointer to ring buffer itself. Ring buffer memory location will be restored from record metadata header. This significantly simplifies verifier, as well as improving API usability. Producer counter increments are serialized under spinlock, so there is a strict ordering between reservations. Commits, on the other hand, are completely lockless and independent. All records become available to consumer in the order of reservations, but only after all previous records where already committed. It is thus possible for slow producers to temporarily hold off submitted records, that were reserved later. Reservation/commit/consumer protocol is verified by litmus tests in Documentation/litmus-test/bpf-rb. One interesting implementation bit, that significantly simplifies (and thus speeds up as well) implementation of both producers and consumers is how data area is mapped twice contiguously back-to-back in the virtual memory. This allows to not take any special measures for samples that have to wrap around at the end of the circular buffer data area, because the next page after the last data page would be first data page again, and thus the sample will still appear completely contiguous in virtual memory. See comment and a simple ASCII diagram showing this visually in bpf_ringbuf_area_alloc(). Another feature that distinguishes BPF ringbuf from perf ring buffer is a self-pacing notifications of new data being availability. bpf_ringbuf_commit() implementation will send a notification of new record being available after commit only if consumer has already caught up right up to the record being committed. If not, consumer still has to catch up and thus will see new data anyways without needing an extra poll notification. Benchmarks (see tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbuf.c) show that this allows to achieve a very high throughput without having to resort to tricks like "notify only every Nth sample", which are necessary with perf buffer. For extreme cases, when BPF program wants more manual control of notifications, commit/discard/output helpers accept BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP and BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP flags, which give full control over notifications of data availability, but require extra caution and diligence in using this API. Comparison to alternatives -------------------------- Before considering implementing BPF ring buffer from scratch existing alternatives in kernel were evaluated, but didn't seem to meet the needs. They largely fell into few categores: - per-CPU buffers (perf, ftrace, etc), which don't satisfy two motivations outlined above (ordering and memory consumption); - linked list-based implementations; while some were multi-producer designs, consuming these from user-space would be very complicated and most probably not performant; memory-mapping contiguous piece of memory is simpler and more performant for user-space consumers; - io_uring is SPSC, but also requires fixed-sized elements. Naively turning SPSC queue into MPSC w/ lock would have subpar performance compared to locked reserve + lockless commit, as with BPF ring buffer. Fixed sized elements would be too limiting for BPF programs, given existing BPF programs heavily rely on variable-sized perf buffer already; - specialized implementations (like a new printk ring buffer, [0]) with lots of printk-specific limitations and implications, that didn't seem to fit well for intended use with BPF programs. [0] https://lwn.net/Articles/779550/ Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200529075424.3139988-2-andriin@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2020-06-01 14:38:22 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	2c78ee898d	bpf: Implement CAP_BPF ... Implement permissions as stated in uapi/linux/capability.h In order to do that the verifier allow_ptr_leaks flag is split into four flags and they are set as: env->allow_ptr_leaks = bpf_allow_ptr_leaks(); env->bypass_spec_v1 = bpf_bypass_spec_v1(); env->bypass_spec_v4 = bpf_bypass_spec_v4(); env->bpf_capable = bpf_capable(); The first three currently equivalent to perfmon_capable(), since leaking kernel pointers and reading kernel memory via side channel attacks is roughly equivalent to reading kernel memory with cap_perfmon. 'bpf_capable' enables bounded loops, precision tracking, bpf to bpf calls and other verifier features. 'allow_ptr_leaks' enable ptr leaks, ptr conversions, subtraction of pointers. 'bypass_spec_v1' disables speculative analysis in the verifier, run time mitigations in bpf array, and enables indirect variable access in bpf programs. 'bypass_spec_v4' disables emission of sanitation code by the verifier. That means that the networking BPF program loaded with CAP_BPF + CAP_NET_ADMIN will have speculative checks done by the verifier and other spectre mitigation applied. Such networking BPF program will not be able to leak kernel pointers and will not be able to access arbitrary kernel memory. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513230355.7858-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com	2020-05-15 17:29:41 +02:00
John Fastabend	3f50f132d8	bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking ... It is not possible for the current verifier to track ALU32 and JMP ops correctly. This can result in the verifier aborting with errors even though the program should be verifiable. BPF codes that hit this can work around it by changin int variables to 64-bit types, marking variables volatile, etc. But this is all very ugly so it would be better to avoid these tricks. But, the main reason to address this now is do_refine_retval_range() was assuming return values could not be negative. Once we fixed this code that was previously working will no longer work. See do_refine_retval_range() patch for details. And we don't want to suddenly cause programs that used to work to fail. The simplest example code snippet that illustrates the problem is likely this, 53: w8 = w0 // r8 <- [0, S32_MAX], // w8 <- [-S32_MIN, X] 54: w8 <s 0 // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX] // w8 <- [0, X] The expected 64-bit and 32-bit bounds after each line are shown on the right. The current issue is without the w* bounds we are forced to use the worst case bound of [0, U32_MAX]. To resolve this type of case, jmp32 creating divergent 32-bit bounds from 64-bit bounds, we add explicit 32-bit register bounds s32_{min|max}_value and u32_{min|max}_value. Then from branch_taken logic creating new bounds we can track 32-bit bounds explicitly. The next case we observed is ALU ops after the jmp32, 53: w8 = w0 // r8 <- [0, S32_MAX], // w8 <- [-S32_MIN, X] 54: w8 <s 0 // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX] // w8 <- [0, X] 55: w8 += 1 // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX+1] // w8 <- [0, X+1] In order to keep the bounds accurate at this point we also need to track ALU32 ops. To do this we add explicit ALU32 logic for each of the ALU ops, mov, add, sub, etc. Finally there is a question of how and when to merge bounds. The cases enumerate here, 1. MOV ALU32 - zext 32-bit -> 64-bit 2. MOV ALU64 - copy 64-bit -> 32-bit 3. op ALU32 - zext 32-bit -> 64-bit 4. op ALU64 - n/a 5. jmp ALU32 - 64-bit: var32_off | upper_32_bits(var64_off) 6. jmp ALU64 - 32-bit: (>> (<< var64_off)) Details for each case, For "MOV ALU32" BPF arch zero extends so we simply copy the bounds from 32-bit into 64-bit ensuring we truncate var_off and 64-bit bounds correctly. See zext_32_to_64. For "MOV ALU64" copy all bounds including 32-bit into new register. If the src register had 32-bit bounds the dst register will as well. For "op ALU32" zero extend 32-bit into 64-bit the same as move, see zext_32_to_64. For "op ALU64" calculate both 32-bit and 64-bit bounds no merging is done here. Except we have a special case. When RSH or ARSH is done we can't simply ignore shifting bits from 64-bit reg into the 32-bit subreg. So currently just push bounds from 64-bit into 32-bit. This will be correct in the sense that they will represent a valid state of the register. However we could lose some accuracy if an ARSH is following a jmp32 operation. We can handle this special case in a follow up series. For "jmp ALU32" mark 64-bit reg unknown and recalculate 64-bit bounds from tnum by setting var_off to ((<<(>>var_off)) | var32_off). We special case if 64-bit bounds has zero'd upper 32bits at which point we can simply copy 32-bit bounds into 64-bit register. This catches a common compiler trick where upper 32-bits are zeroed and then 32-bit ops are used followed by a 64-bit compare or 64-bit op on a pointer. See __reg_combine_64_into_32(). For "jmp ALU64" cast the bounds of the 64bit to their 32-bit counterpart. For example s32_min_value = (s32)reg->smin_value. For tnum use only the lower 32bits via, (>>(<<var_off)). See __reg_combine_64_into_32(). Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560419880.10843.11448220440809118343.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower	2020-03-30 14:59:53 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	51c39bb1d5	bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification ... New llvm and old llvm with libbpf help produce BTF that distinguish global and static functions. Unlike arguments of static function the arguments of global functions cannot be removed or optimized away by llvm. The compiler has to use exactly the arguments specified in a function prototype. The argument type information allows the verifier validate each global function independently. For now only supported argument types are pointer to context and scalars. In the future pointers to structures, sizes, pointer to packet data can be supported as well. Consider the following example: static int f1(int ...) { ... } int f3(int b); int f2(int a) { f1(a) + f3(a); } int f3(int b) { ... } int main(...) { f1(...) + f2(...) + f3(...); } The verifier will start its safety checks from the first global function f2(). It will recursively descend into f1() because it's static. Then it will check that arguments match for the f3() invocation inside f2(). It will not descend into f3(). It will finish f2() that has to be successfully verified for all possible values of 'a'. Then it will proceed with f3(). That function also has to be safe for all possible values of 'b'. Then it will start subprog 0 (which is main() function). It will recursively descend into f1() and will skip full check of f2() and f3(), since they are global. The order of processing global functions doesn't affect safety, since all global functions must be proven safe based on their arguments only. Such function by function verification can drastically improve speed of the verification and reduce complexity. Note that the stack limit of 512 still applies to the call chain regardless whether functions were static or global. The nested level of 8 also still applies. The same recursion prevention checks are in place as well. The type information and static/global kind is preserved after the verification hence in the above example global function f2() and f3() can be replaced later by equivalent functions with the same types that are loaded and verified later without affecting safety of this main() program. Such replacement (re-linking) of global functions is a subject of future patches. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200110064124.1760511-3-ast@kernel.org	2020-01-10 17:20:07 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann	d2e4c1e6c2	bpf: Constant map key tracking for prog array pokes ... Add tracking of constant keys into tail call maps. The signature of bpf_tail_call_proto is that arg1 is ctx, arg2 map pointer and arg3 is a index key. The direct call approach for tail calls can be enabled if the verifier asserted that for all branches leading to the tail call helper invocation, the map pointer and index key were both constant and the same. Tracking of map pointers we already do from prior work via c93552c443 ("bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation") and 09772d92cd ("bpf: avoid retpoline for lookup/update/ delete calls on maps"). Given the tail call map index key is not on stack but directly in the register, we can add similar tracking approach and later in fixup_bpf_calls() add a poke descriptor to the progs poke_tab with the relevant information for the JITing phase. We internally reuse insn->imm for the rewritten BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL instruction in order to point into the prog's poke_tab, and keep insn->imm as 0 as indicator that current indirect tail call emission must be used. Note that publishing to the tracker must happen at the end of fixup_bpf_calls() since adding elements to the poke_tab reallocates its memory, so we need to wait until its in final state. Future work can generalize and add similar approach to optimize plain array map lookups. Difference there is that we need to look into the key value that sits on stack. For clarity in bpf_insn_aux_data, map_state has been renamed into map_ptr_state, so we get map_{ptr,key}_state as trackers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e8db37f6b2ae60402fa40216c96738ee9b316c32.1574452833.git.daniel@iogearbox.net	2019-11-24 17:04:11 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov	8c1b6e69dc	bpf: Compare BTF types of functions arguments with actual types ... Make the verifier check that BTF types of function arguments match actual types passed into top-level BPF program and into BPF-to-BPF calls. If types match such BPF programs and sub-programs will have full support of BPF trampoline. If types mismatch the trampoline has to be conservative. It has to save/restore five program arguments and assume 64-bit scalars. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191114185720.1641606-17-ast@kernel.org	2019-11-15 23:45:02 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov	9e15db6613	bpf: Implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF ... libbpf analyzes bpf C program, searches in-kernel BTF for given type name and stores it into expected_attach_type. The kernel verifier expects this btf_id to point to something like: typedef void (*btf_trace_kfree_skb)(void *, struct sk_buff *skb, void *loc); which represents signature of raw_tracepoint "kfree_skb". Then btf_ctx_access() matches ctx+0 access in bpf program with 'skb' and 'ctx+8' access with 'loc' arguments of "kfree_skb" tracepoint. In first case it passes btf_id of 'struct sk_buff *' back to the verifier core and 'void *' in second case. Then the verifier tracks PTR_TO_BTF_ID as any other pointer type. Like PTR_TO_SOCKET points to 'struct bpf_sock', PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK points to 'struct bpf_tcp_sock', and so on. PTR_TO_BTF_ID points to in-kernel structs. If 1234 is btf_id of 'struct sk_buff' in vmlinux's BTF then PTR_TO_BTF_ID#1234 points to one of in kernel skbs. When PTR_TO_BTF_ID#1234 is dereferenced (like r2 = *(u64 *)r1 + 32) the btf_struct_access() checks which field of 'struct sk_buff' is at offset 32. Checks that size of access matches type definition of the field and continues to track the dereferenced type. If that field was a pointer to 'struct net_device' the r2's type will be PTR_TO_BTF_ID#456. Where 456 is btf_id of 'struct net_device' in vmlinux's BTF. Such verifier analysis prevents "cheating" in BPF C program. The program cannot cast arbitrary pointer to 'struct sk_buff *' and access it. C compiler would allow type cast, of course, but the verifier will notice type mismatch based on BPF assembly and in-kernel BTF. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016032505.2089704-7-ast@kernel.org	2019-10-17 16:44:35 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov	8580ac9404	bpf: Process in-kernel BTF ... If in-kernel BTF exists parse it and prepare 'struct btf *btf_vmlinux' for further use by the verifier. In-kernel BTF is trusted just like kallsyms and other build artifacts embedded into vmlinux. Yet run this BTF image through BTF verifier to make sure that it is valid and it wasn't mangled during the build. If in-kernel BTF is incorrect it means either gcc or pahole or kernel are buggy. In such case disallow loading BPF programs. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016032505.2089704-4-ast@kernel.org	2019-10-17 16:44:35 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov	10d274e880	bpf: introduce verifier internal test flag ... Introduce BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to stress test parentage chain and state pruning. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-08-28 00:30:11 +02:00
David S. Miller	dca73a65a6	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next ... Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2019-06-19 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. The main changes are: 1) new SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF setsocktopt, from Martin. 2) BTF based map definition, from Andrii. 3) support bpf_map_lookup_elem for xskmap, from Jonathan. 4) bounded loops and scalar precision logic in the verifier, from Alexei. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2019-06-20 00:06:27 -04:00
Alexei Starovoitov	b5dc0163d8	bpf: precise scalar_value tracking ... Introduce precision tracking logic that helps cilium programs the most: old clang old clang new clang new clang with all patches with all patches bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 1838 2283 1923 1863 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3218 2657 3077 2468 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1064 545 1062 544 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 26935 23045 166729 22629 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 34439 35240 174607 28805 bpf_netdev.o 9721 8753 8407 6801 bpf_overlay.o 6184 7901 5420 4754 bpf_lxc_jit.o 39389 50925 39389 50925 Consider code: 654: (85) call bpf_get_hash_recalc#34 655: (bf) r7 = r0 656: (15) if r8 == 0x0 goto pc+29 657: (bf) r2 = r10 658: (07) r2 += -48 659: (18) r1 = 0xffff8881e41e1b00 661: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 662: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+23 663: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r0 +0) 664: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+21 665: (bf) r8 = r7 666: (57) r8 &= 65535 667: (bf) r2 = r8 668: (3f) r2 /= r1 669: (2f) r2 *= r1 670: (bf) r1 = r8 671: (1f) r1 -= r2 672: (57) r1 &= 255 673: (25) if r1 > 0x1e goto pc+12 R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=20,vs=64,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=30,var_off=(0x0; 0x1f)) 674: (67) r1 <<= 1 675: (0f) r0 += r1 At this point the verifier will notice that scalar R1 is used in map pointer adjustment. R1 has to be precise for later operations on R0 to be validated properly. The verifier will backtrack the above code in the following way: last_idx 675 first_idx 664 regs=2 stack=0 before 675: (0f) r0 += r1 // started backtracking R1 regs=2 is a bitmask regs=2 stack=0 before 674: (67) r1 <<= 1 regs=2 stack=0 before 673: (25) if r1 > 0x1e goto pc+12 regs=2 stack=0 before 672: (57) r1 &= 255 regs=2 stack=0 before 671: (1f) r1 -= r2 // now both R1 and R2 has to be precise -> regs=6 mask regs=6 stack=0 before 670: (bf) r1 = r8 // after this insn R8 and R2 has to be precise regs=104 stack=0 before 669: (2f) r2 *= r1 // after this one R8, R2, and R1 regs=106 stack=0 before 668: (3f) r2 /= r1 regs=106 stack=0 before 667: (bf) r2 = r8 regs=102 stack=0 before 666: (57) r8 &= 65535 regs=102 stack=0 before 665: (bf) r8 = r7 regs=82 stack=0 before 664: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+21 // this is the end of verifier state. The following regs will be marked precised: R1_rw=invP(id=0,umax_value=65535,var_off=(0x0; 0xffff)) R7_rw=invP(id=0) parent didn't have regs=82 stack=0 marks // so backtracking continues into parent state last_idx 663 first_idx 655 regs=82 stack=0 before 663: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r0 +0) // R1 was assigned no need to track it further regs=80 stack=0 before 662: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+23 // keep tracking R7 regs=80 stack=0 before 661: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 // keep tracking R7 regs=80 stack=0 before 659: (18) r1 = 0xffff8881e41e1b00 regs=80 stack=0 before 658: (07) r2 += -48 regs=80 stack=0 before 657: (bf) r2 = r10 regs=80 stack=0 before 656: (15) if r8 == 0x0 goto pc+29 regs=80 stack=0 before 655: (bf) r7 = r0 // here the assignment into R7 // mark R0 to be precise: R0_rw=invP(id=0) parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks // regs=1 -> tracking R0 last_idx 654 first_idx 644 regs=1 stack=0 before 654: (85) call bpf_get_hash_recalc#34 // and in the parent frame it was a return value // nothing further to backtrack Two scalar registers not marked precise are equivalent from state pruning point of view. More details in the patch comments. It doesn't support bpf2bpf calls yet and enabled for root only. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-06-19 02:22:52 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov	2589726d12	bpf: introduce bounded loops ... Allow the verifier to validate the loops by simulating their execution. Exisiting programs have used '#pragma unroll' to unroll the loops by the compiler. Instead let the verifier simulate all iterations of the loop. In order to do that introduce parentage chain of bpf_verifier_state and 'branches' counter for the number of branches left to explore. See more detailed algorithm description in bpf_verifier.h This algorithm borrows the key idea from Edward Cree approach: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/877222/ Additional state pruning heuristics make such brute force loop walk practical even for large loops. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-06-19 02:22:51 +02:00
David S. Miller	a6cdeeb16b	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net ... Some ISDN files that got removed in net-next had some changes done in mainline, take the removals. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2019-06-07 11:00:14 -07:00
Thomas Gleixner	25763b3c86	treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 206 ... Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of version 2 of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 107 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528171438.615055994@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>	2019-05-30 11:29:53 -07:00
Jiong Wang	5327ed3d44	bpf: verifier: mark verified-insn with sub-register zext flag ... eBPF ISA specification requires high 32-bit cleared when low 32-bit sub-register is written. This applies to destination register of ALU32 etc. JIT back-ends must guarantee this semantic when doing code-gen. x86_64 and AArch64 ISA has the same semantics, so the corresponding JIT back-end doesn't need to do extra work. However, 32-bit arches (arm, x86, nfp etc.) and some other 64-bit arches (PowerPC, SPARC etc) need to do explicit zero extension to meet this requirement, otherwise code like the following will fail. u64_value = (u64) u32_value ... other uses of u64_value This is because compiler could exploit the semantic described above and save those zero extensions for extending u32_value to u64_value, these JIT back-ends are expected to guarantee this through inserting extra zero extensions which however could be a significant increase on the code size. Some benchmarks show there could be ~40% sub-register writes out of total insns, meaning at least ~40% extra code-gen. One observation is these extra zero extensions are not always necessary. Take above code snippet for example, it is possible u32_value will never be casted into a u64, the value of high 32-bit of u32_value then could be ignored and extra zero extension could be eliminated. This patch implements this idea, insns defining sub-registers will be marked when the high 32-bit of the defined sub-register matters. For those unmarked insns, it is safe to eliminate high 32-bit clearnace for them. Algo: - Split read flags into READ32 and READ64. - Record index of insn that does sub-register write. Keep the index inside reg state and update it during verifier insn walking. - A full register read on a sub-register marks its definition insn as needing zero extension on dst register. A new sub-register write overrides the old one. - When propagating read64 during path pruning, also mark any insn defining a sub-register that is read in the pruned path as full-register. Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-05-24 18:58:37 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	dc2a4ebc0b	bpf: convert explored_states to hash table ... All prune points inside a callee bpf function most likely will have different callsites. For example, if function foo() is called from two callsites the half of explored states in all prune points in foo() will be useless for subsequent walking of one of those callsites. Fortunately explored_states pruning heuristics keeps the number of states per prune point small, but walking these states is still a waste of cpu time when the callsite of the current state is different from the callsite of the explored state. To improve pruning logic convert explored_states into hash table and use simple insn_idx ^ callsite hash to select hash bucket. This optimization has no effect on programs without bpf2bpf calls and drastically improves programs with calls. In the later case it reduces total memory consumption in 1M scale tests by almost 3 times (peak_states drops from 5752 to 2016). Care should be taken when comparing the states for equivalency. Since the same hash bucket can now contain states with different indices the insn_idx has to be part of verifier_state and compared. Different hash table sizes and different hash functions were explored, but the results were not significantly better vs this patch. They can be improved in the future. Hit/miss heuristic is not counting index miscompare as a miss. Otherwise verifier stats become unstable when experimenting with different hash functions. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-05-24 01:46:22 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov	a8f500af0c	bpf: split explored_states ... split explored_states into prune_point boolean mark and link list of explored states. This removes STATE_LIST_MARK hack and allows marks to be separate from states. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-05-24 01:46:22 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov	7df737e991	bpf: remove global variables ... Move three global variables protected by bpf_verifier_lock into 'struct bpf_verifier_env' to allow parallel verification. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-04-23 01:50:43 +02:00
Daniel Borkmann	d8eca5bbb2	bpf: implement lookup-free direct value access for maps ... This generic extension to BPF maps allows for directly loading an address residing inside a BPF map value as a single BPF ldimm64 instruction! The idea is similar to what BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD does today, which is a special src_reg flag for ldimm64 instruction that indicates that inside the first part of the double insns's imm field is a file descriptor which the verifier then replaces as a full 64bit address of the map into both imm parts. For the newly added BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE src_reg flag, the idea is the following: the first part of the double insns's imm field is again a file descriptor corresponding to the map, and the second part of the imm field is an offset into the value. The verifier will then replace both imm parts with an address that points into the BPF map value at the given value offset for maps that support this operation. Currently supported is array map with single entry. It is possible to support more than just single map element by reusing both 16bit off fields of the insns as a map index, so full array map lookup could be expressed that way. It hasn't been implemented here due to lack of concrete use case, but could easily be done so in future in a compatible way, since both off fields right now have to be 0 and would correctly denote a map index 0. The BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE is a distinct flag as otherwise with BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD we could not differ offset 0 between load of map pointer versus load of map's value at offset 0, and changing BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD's encoding into off by one to differ between regular map pointer and map value pointer would add unnecessary complexity and increases barrier for debugability thus less suitable. Using the second part of the imm field as an offset into the value does /not/ come with limitations since maximum possible value size is in u32 universe anyway. This optimization allows for efficiently retrieving an address to a map value memory area without having to issue a helper call which needs to prepare registers according to calling convention, etc, without needing the extra NULL test, and without having to add the offset in an additional instruction to the value base pointer. The verifier then treats the destination register as PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE with constant reg->off from the user passed offset from the second imm field, and guarantees that this is within bounds of the map value. Any subsequent operations are normally treated as typical map value handling without anything extra needed from verification side. The two map operations for direct value access have been added to array map for now. In future other types could be supported as well depending on the use case. The main use case for this commit is to allow for BPF loader support for global variables that reside in .data/.rodata/.bss sections such that we can directly load the address of them with minimal additional infrastructure required. Loader support has been added in subsequent commits for libbpf library. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-04-09 17:05:46 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	9f4686c41b	bpf: improve verification speed by droping states ... Branch instructions, branch targets and calls in a bpf program are the places where the verifier remembers states that led to successful verification of the program. These states are used to prune brute force program analysis. For unprivileged programs there is a limit of 64 states per such 'branching' instructions (maximum length is tracked by max_states_per_insn counter introduced in the previous patch). Simply reducing this threshold to 32 or lower increases insn_processed metric to the point that small valid programs get rejected. For root programs there is no limit and cilium programs can have max_states_per_insn to be 100 or higher. Walking 100+ states multiplied by number of 'branching' insns during verification consumes significant amount of cpu time. Turned out simple LRU-like mechanism can be used to remove states that unlikely will be helpful in future search pruning. This patch introduces hit_cnt and miss_cnt counters: hit_cnt - this many times this state successfully pruned the search miss_cnt - this many times this state was not equivalent to other states (and that other states were added to state list) The heuristic introduced in this patch is: if (sl->miss_cnt > sl->hit_cnt * 3 + 3) /* drop this state from future considerations */ Higher numbers increase max_states_per_insn (allow more states to be considered for pruning) and slow verification speed, but do not meaningfully reduce insn_processed metric. Lower numbers drop too many states and insn_processed increases too much. Many different formulas were considered. This one is simple and works well enough in practice. (the analysis was done on selftests/progs/* and on cilium programs) The end result is this heuristic improves verification speed by 10 times. Large synthetic programs that used to take a second more now take 1/10 of a second. In cases where max_states_per_insn used to be 100 or more, now it's ~10. There is a slight increase in insn_processed for cilium progs: before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 1831 1838 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3029 3218 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1064 1064 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 26309 26935 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 33517 34439 bpf_netdev.o 9713 9721 bpf_overlay.o 6184 6184 bpf_lcx_jit.o 37335 39389 And 2-3 times improvement in the verification speed. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-04-04 01:27:37 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov	06ee7115b0	bpf: add verifier stats and log_level bit 2 ... In order to understand the verifier bottlenecks add various stats and extend log_level: log_level 1 and 2 are kept as-is: bit 0 - level=1 - print every insn and verifier state at branch points bit 1 - level=2 - print every insn and verifier state at every insn bit 2 - level=4 - print verifier error and stats at the end of verification When verifier rejects the program the libbpf is trying to load the program twice. Once with log_level=0 (no messages, only error code is reported to user space) and second time with log_level=1 to tell the user why the verifier rejected it. With introduction of bit 2 - level=4 the libbpf can choose to always use that level and load programs once, since the verification speed is not affected and in case of error the verbose message will be available. Note that the verifier stats are not part of uapi just like all other verbose messages. They're expected to change in the future. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-04-04 01:27:37 +02:00
Martin KaFai Lau	1b98658968	bpf: Fix bpf_tcp_sock and bpf_sk_fullsock issue related to bpf_sk_release ... Lorenz Bauer [thanks!] reported that a ptr returned by bpf_tcp_sock(sk) can still be accessed after bpf_sk_release(sk). Both bpf_tcp_sock() and bpf_sk_fullsock() have the same issue. This patch addresses them together. A simple reproducer looks like this: sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(); /* if (!sk) ... */ tp = bpf_tcp_sock(sk); /* if (!tp) ... */ bpf_sk_release(sk); snd_cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd; /* oops! The verifier does not complain. */ The problem is the verifier did not scrub the register's states of the tcp_sock ptr (tp) after bpf_sk_release(sk). [ Note that when calling bpf_tcp_sock(sk), the sk is not always refcount-acquired. e.g. bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk). The verifier works fine for this case. ] Currently, the verifier does not track if a helper's return ptr (in REG_0) is "carry"-ing one of its argument's refcount status. To carry this info, the reg1->id needs to be stored in reg0. One approach was tried, like "reg0->id = reg1->id", when calling "bpf_tcp_sock()". The main idea was to avoid adding another "ref_obj_id" for the same reg. However, overlapping the NULL marking and ref tracking purpose in one "id" does not work well: ref_sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(); fullsock = bpf_sk_fullsock(ref_sk); tp = bpf_tcp_sock(ref_sk); if (!fullsock) { bpf_sk_release(ref_sk); return 0; } /* fullsock_reg->id is marked for NOT-NULL. * Same for tp_reg->id because they have the same id. */ /* oops. verifier did not complain about the missing !tp check */ snd_cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd; Hence, a new "ref_obj_id" is needed in "struct bpf_reg_state". With a new ref_obj_id, when bpf_sk_release(sk) is called, the verifier can scrub all reg states which has a ref_obj_id match. It is done with the changes in release_reg_references() in this patch. While fixing it, sk_to_full_sk() is removed from bpf_tcp_sock() and bpf_sk_fullsock() to avoid these helpers from returning another ptr. It will make bpf_sk_release(tp) possible: sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(); /* if (!sk) ... */ tp = bpf_tcp_sock(sk); /* if (!tp) ... */ bpf_sk_release(tp); A separate helper "bpf_get_listener_sock()" will be added in a later patch to do sk_to_full_sk(). Misc change notes: - To allow bpf_sk_release(tp), the arg of bpf_sk_release() is changed from ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET to ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON. ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET is removed from bpf.h since no helper is using it. - arg_type_is_refcounted() is renamed to arg_type_may_be_refcounted() because ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON is the only one and skb->sk is not refcounted. All bpf_sk_release(), bpf_sk_fullsock() and bpf_tcp_sock() take ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON. - check_refcount_ok() ensures is_acquire_function() cannot take arg_type_may_be_refcounted() as its argument. - The check_func_arg() can only allow one refcount-ed arg. It is guaranteed by check_refcount_ok() which ensures at most one arg can be refcounted. Hence, it is a verifier internal error if >1 refcount arg found in check_func_arg(). - In release_reference(), release_reference_state() is called first to ensure a match on "reg->ref_obj_id" can be found before scrubbing the reg states with release_reg_references(). - reg_is_refcounted() is no longer needed. 1. In mark_ptr_or_null_regs(), its usage is replaced by "ref_obj_id && ref_obj_id == id" because, when is_null == true, release_reference_state() should only be called on the ref_obj_id obtained by a acquire helper (i.e. is_acquire_function() == true). Otherwise, the following would happen: sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(); /* if (!sk) { ... } */ fullsock = bpf_sk_fullsock(sk); if (!fullsock) { /* * release_reference_state(fullsock_reg->ref_obj_id) * where fullsock_reg->ref_obj_id == sk_reg->ref_obj_id. * * Hence, the following bpf_sk_release(sk) will fail * because the ref state has already been released in the * earlier release_reference_state(fullsock_reg->ref_obj_id). */ bpf_sk_release(sk); } 2. In release_reg_references(), the current reg_is_refcounted() call is unnecessary because the id check is enough. - The type_is_refcounted() and type_is_refcounted_or_null() are no longer needed also because reg_is_refcounted() is removed. Fixes: 655a51e536 ("bpf: Add struct bpf_tcp_sock and BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock") Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-03-13 12:04:35 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	d83525ca62	bpf: introduce bpf_spin_lock ... Introduce 'struct bpf_spin_lock' and bpf_spin_lock/unlock() helpers to let bpf program serialize access to other variables. Example: struct hash_elem { int cnt; struct bpf_spin_lock lock; }; struct hash_elem * val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key); if (val) { bpf_spin_lock(&val->lock); val->cnt++; bpf_spin_unlock(&val->lock); } Restrictions and safety checks: - bpf_spin_lock is only allowed inside HASH and ARRAY maps. - BTF description of the map is mandatory for safety analysis. - bpf program can take one bpf_spin_lock at a time, since two or more can cause dead locks. - only one 'struct bpf_spin_lock' is allowed per map element. It drastically simplifies implementation yet allows bpf program to use any number of bpf_spin_locks. - when bpf_spin_lock is taken the calls (either bpf2bpf or helpers) are not allowed. - bpf program must bpf_spin_unlock() before return. - bpf program can access 'struct bpf_spin_lock' only via bpf_spin_lock()/bpf_spin_unlock() helpers. - load/store into 'struct bpf_spin_lock lock;' field is not allowed. - to use bpf_spin_lock() helper the BTF description of map value must be a struct and have 'struct bpf_spin_lock anyname;' field at the top level. Nested lock inside another struct is not allowed. - syscall map_lookup doesn't copy bpf_spin_lock field to user space. - syscall map_update and program map_update do not update bpf_spin_lock field. - bpf_spin_lock cannot be on the stack or inside networking packet. bpf_spin_lock can only be inside HASH or ARRAY map value. - bpf_spin_lock is available to root only and to all program types. - bpf_spin_lock is not allowed in inner maps of map-in-map. - ld_abs is not allowed inside spin_lock-ed region. - tracing progs and socket filter progs cannot use bpf_spin_lock due to insufficient preemption checks Implementation details: - cgroup-bpf class of programs can nest with xdp/tc programs. Hence bpf_spin_lock is equivalent to spin_lock_irqsave. Other solutions to avoid nested bpf_spin_lock are possible. Like making sure that all networking progs run with softirq disabled. spin_lock_irqsave is the simplest and doesn't add overhead to the programs that don't use it. - arch_spinlock_t is used when its implemented as queued_spin_lock - archs can force their own arch_spinlock_t - on architectures where queued_spin_lock is not available and sizeof(arch_spinlock_t) != sizeof(__u32) trivial lock is used. - presence of bpf_spin_lock inside map value could have been indicated via extra flag during map_create, but specifying it via BTF is cleaner. It provides introspection for map key/value and reduces user mistakes. Next steps: - allow bpf_spin_lock in other map types (like cgroup local storage) - introduce BPF_F_LOCK flag for bpf_map_update() syscall and helper to request kernel to grab bpf_spin_lock before rewriting the value. That will serialize access to map elements. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2019-02-01 20:55:38 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski	08ca90afba	bpf: notify offload JITs about optimizations ... Let offload JITs know when instructions are replaced and optimized out, so they can update their state appropriately. The optimizations are best effort, if JIT returns an error from any callback verifier will stop notifying it as state may now be out of sync, but the verifier continues making progress. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-01-23 17:35:32 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski	9e4c24e7ee	bpf: verifier: record original instruction index ... The communication between the verifier and advanced JITs is based on instruction indexes. We have to keep them stable throughout the optimizations otherwise referring to a particular instruction gets messy quickly. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-01-23 17:35:32 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann	d3bd7413e0	bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths ... While 979d63d50c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") took care of rejecting alu op on pointer when e.g. pointer came from two different map values with different map properties such as value size, Jann reported that a case was not covered yet when a given alu op is used in both "ptr_reg += reg" and "numeric_reg += reg" from different branches where we would incorrectly try to sanitize based on the pointer's limit. Catch this corner case and reject the program instead. Fixes: 979d63d50c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-01-05 21:32:38 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann	979d63d50c	bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic ... Jann reported that the original commit back in b2157399cc ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") was not sufficient to stop CPU from speculating out of bounds memory access: While b2157399cc only focussed on masking array map access for unprivileged users for tail calls and data access such that the user provided index gets sanitized from BPF program and syscall side, there is still a more generic form affected from BPF programs that applies to most maps that hold user data in relation to dynamic map access when dealing with unknown scalars or "slow" known scalars as access offset, for example: - Load a map value pointer into R6 - Load an index into R7 - Do a slow computation (e.g. with a memory dependency) that loads a limit into R8 (e.g. load the limit from a map for high latency, then mask it to make the verifier happy) - Exit if R7 >= R8 (mispredicted branch) - Load R0 = R6[R7] - Load R0 = R6[R0] For unknown scalars there are two options in the BPF verifier where we could derive knowledge from in order to guarantee safe access to the memory: i) While </>/<=/>= variants won't allow to derive any lower or upper bounds from the unknown scalar where it would be safe to add it to the map value pointer, it is possible through ==/!= test however. ii) another option is to transform the unknown scalar into a known scalar, for example, through ALU ops combination such as R &= <imm> followed by R |= <imm> or any similar combination where the original information from the unknown scalar would be destroyed entirely leaving R with a constant. The initial slow load still precedes the latter ALU ops on that register, so the CPU executes speculatively from that point. Once we have the known scalar, any compare operation would work then. A third option only involving registers with known scalars could be crafted as described in [0] where a CPU port (e.g. Slow Int unit) would be filled with many dependent computations such that the subsequent condition depending on its outcome has to wait for evaluation on its execution port and thereby executing speculatively if the speculated code can be scheduled on a different execution port, or any other form of mistraining as described in [1], for example. Given this is not limited to only unknown scalars, not only map but also stack access is affected since both is accessible for unprivileged users and could potentially be used for out of bounds access under speculation. In order to prevent any of these cases, the verifier is now sanitizing pointer arithmetic on the offset such that any out of bounds speculation would be masked in a way where the pointer arithmetic result in the destination register will stay unchanged, meaning offset masked into zero similar as in array_index_nospec() case. With regards to implementation, there are three options that were considered: i) new insn for sanitation, ii) push/pop insn and sanitation as inlined BPF, iii) reuse of ax register and sanitation as inlined BPF. Option i) has the downside that we end up using from reserved bits in the opcode space, but also that we would require each JIT to emit masking as native arch opcodes meaning mitigation would have slow adoption till everyone implements it eventually which is counter-productive. Option ii) and iii) have both in common that a temporary register is needed in order to implement the sanitation as inlined BPF since we are not allowed to modify the source register. While a push / pop insn in ii) would be useful to have in any case, it requires once again that every JIT needs to implement it first. While possible, amount of changes needed would also be unsuitable for a -stable patch. Therefore, the path which has fewer changes, less BPF instructions for the mitigation and does not require anything to be changed in the JITs is option iii) which this work is pursuing. The ax register is already mapped to a register in all JITs (modulo arm32 where it's mapped to stack as various other BPF registers there) and used in constant blinding for JITs-only so far. It can be reused for verifier rewrites under certain constraints. The interpreter's tmp "register" has therefore been remapped into extending the register set with hidden ax register and reusing that for a number of instructions that needed the prior temporary variable internally (e.g. div, mod). This allows for zero increase in stack space usage in the interpreter, and enables (restricted) generic use in rewrites otherwise as long as such a patchlet does not make use of these instructions. The sanitation mask is dynamic and relative to the offset the map value or stack pointer currently holds. There are various cases that need to be taken under consideration for the masking, e.g. such operation could look as follows: ptr += val or val += ptr or ptr -= val. Thus, the value to be sanitized could reside either in source or in destination register, and the limit is different depending on whether the ALU op is addition or subtraction and depending on the current known and bounded offset. The limit is derived as follows: limit := max_value_size - (smin_value + off). For subtraction: limit := umax_value + off. This holds because we do not allow any pointer arithmetic that would temporarily go out of bounds or would have an unknown value with mixed signed bounds where it is unclear at verification time whether the actual runtime value would be either negative or positive. For example, we have a derived map pointer value with constant offset and bounded one, so limit based on smin_value works because the verifier requires that statically analyzed arithmetic on the pointer must be in bounds, and thus it checks if resulting smin_value + off and umax_value + off is still within map value bounds at time of arithmetic in addition to time of access. Similarly, for the case of stack access we derive the limit as follows: MAX_BPF_STACK + off for subtraction and -off for the case of addition where off := ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value. Subtraction is a special case for the masking which can be in form of ptr += -val, ptr -= -val, or ptr -= val. In the first two cases where we know that the value is negative, we need to temporarily negate the value in order to do the sanitation on a positive value where we later swap the ALU op, and restore original source register if the value was in source. The sanitation of pointer arithmetic alone is still not fully sufficient as is, since a scenario like the following could happen ... PTR += 0x1000 (e.g. K-based imm) PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON [...] ... which under speculation could end up as ... PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ] PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ] [...] ... and therefore still access out of bounds. To prevent such case, the verifier is also analyzing safety for potential out of bounds access under speculative execution. Meaning, it is also simulating pointer access under truncation. We therefore "branch off" and push the current verification state after the ALU operation with known 0 to the verification stack for later analysis. Given the current path analysis succeeded it is likely that the one under speculation can be pruned. In any case, it is also subject to existing complexity limits and therefore anything beyond this point will be rejected. In terms of pruning, it needs to be ensured that the verification state from speculative execution simulation must never prune a non-speculative execution path, therefore, we mark verifier state accordingly at the time of push_stack(). If verifier detects out of bounds access under speculative execution from one of the possible paths that includes a truncation, it will reject such program. Given we mask every reg-based pointer arithmetic for unprivileged programs, we've been looking into how it could affect real-world programs in terms of size increase. As the majority of programs are targeted for privileged-only use case, we've unconditionally enabled masking (with its alu restrictions on top of it) for privileged programs for the sake of testing in order to check i) whether they get rejected in its current form, and ii) by how much the number of instructions and size will increase. We've tested this by using Katran, Cilium and test_l4lb from the kernel selftests. For Katran we've evaluated balancer_kern.o, Cilium bpf_lxc.o and an older test object bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o and l4lb we've used test_l4lb.o as well as test_l4lb_noinline.o. We found that none of the programs got rejected by the verifier with this change, and that impact is rather minimal to none. balancer_kern.o had 13,904 bytes (1,738 insns) xlated and 7,797 bytes JITed before and after the change. Most complex program in bpf_lxc.o had 30,544 bytes (3,817 insns) xlated and 18,538 bytes JITed before and after and none of the other tail call programs in bpf_lxc.o had any changes either. For the older bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o object we found a small increase from 20,616 bytes (2,576 insns) and 12,536 bytes JITed before to 20,664 bytes (2,582 insns) and 12,558 bytes JITed after the change. Other programs from that object file had similar small increase. Both test_l4lb.o had no change and remained at 6,544 bytes (817 insns) xlated and 3,401 bytes JITed and for test_l4lb_noinline.o constant at 5,080 bytes (634 insns) xlated and 3,313 bytes JITed. This can be explained in that LLVM typically optimizes stack based pointer arithmetic by using K-based operations and that use of dynamic map access is not overly frequent. However, in future we may decide to optimize the algorithm further under known guarantees from branch and value speculation. Latter seems also unclear in terms of prediction heuristics that today's CPUs apply as well as whether there could be collisions in e.g. the predictor's Value History/Pattern Table for triggering out of bounds access, thus masking is performed unconditionally at this point but could be subject to relaxation later on. We were generally also brainstorming various other approaches for mitigation, but the blocker was always lack of available registers at runtime and/or overhead for runtime tracking of limits belonging to a specific pointer. Thus, we found this to be minimally intrusive under given constraints. With that in place, a simple example with sanitized access on unprivileged load at post-verification time looks as follows: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 282 [...] 28: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) 29: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r7 +8) 30: (57) r1 &= 15 31: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +4608) 32: (57) r3 &= 1 33: (47) r3 |= 1 34: (2d) if r2 > r3 goto pc+19 35: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 | 36: (1f) r11 -= r2 | Dynamic sanitation for pointer 37: (4f) r11 |= r2 | arithmetic with registers 38: (87) r11 = -r11 | containing bounded or known 39: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 | scalars in order to prevent 40: (5f) r11 &= r2 | out of bounds speculation. 41: (0f) r4 += r11 | 42: (71) r4 = *(u8 *)(r4 +0) 43: (6f) r4 <<= r1 [...] For the case where the scalar sits in the destination register as opposed to the source register, the following code is emitted for the above example: [...] 16: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 17: (1f) r11 -= r2 18: (4f) r11 |= r2 19: (87) r11 = -r11 20: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 21: (5f) r2 &= r11 22: (0f) r2 += r0 23: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) [...] JIT blinding example with non-conflicting use of r10: [...] d5: je 0x0000000000000106 _ d7: mov 0x0(%rax),%edi | da: mov $0xf153246,%r10d | Index load from map value and e0: xor $0xf153259,%r10 | (const blinded) mask with 0x1f. e7: and %r10,%rdi |_ ea: mov $0x2f,%r10d | f0: sub %rdi,%r10 | Sanitized addition. Both use r10 f3: or %rdi,%r10 | but do not interfere with each f6: neg %r10 | other. (Neither do these instructions f9: sar $0x3f,%r10 | interfere with the use of ax as temp fd: and %r10,%rdi | in interpreter.) 100: add %rax,%rdi |_ 103: mov 0x0(%rdi),%eax [...] Tested that it fixes Jann's reproducer, and also checked that test_verifier and test_progs suite with interpreter, JIT and JIT with hardening enabled on x86-64 and arm64 runs successfully. [0] Speculose: Analyzing the Security Implications of Speculative Execution in CPUs, Giorgi Maisuradze and Christian Rossow, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04084.pdf [1] A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and Defenses, Claudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Benjamin von Berg, Philipp Ortner, Frank Piessens, Dmitry Evtyushkin, Daniel Gruss, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.05441.pdf Fixes: b2157399cc ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann	c08435ec7f	bpf: move {prev_,}insn_idx into verifier env ... Move prev_insn_idx and insn_idx from the do_check() function into the verifier environment, so they can be read inside the various helper functions for handling the instructions. It's easier to put this into the environment rather than changing all call-sites only to pass it along. insn_idx is useful in particular since this later on allows to hold state in env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx]. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov	9242b5f561	bpf: add self-check logic to liveness analysis ... Introduce REG_LIVE_DONE to check the liveness propagation and prepare the states for merging. See algorithm description in clean_live_states(). Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-12-15 01:28:32 +01:00
Martin KaFai Lau	d9762e84ed	bpf: verbose log bpf_line_info in verifier ... This patch adds bpf_line_info during the verifier's verbose. It can give error context for debug purpose. ~~~~~~~~~~ Here is the verbose log for backedge: while (a) { a += bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), a); } ~> bpftool prog load ./test_loop.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_loop type tracepoint 13: while (a) { 3: a += bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); back-edge from insn 13 to 3 ~~~~~~~~~~ Here is the verbose log for invalid pkt access: Modification to test_xdp_noinline.c: data = (void *)(long)xdp->data; data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end; /* if (data + 4 > data_end) return XDP_DROP; */ *(u32 *)data = dst->dst; ~> bpftool prog load ./test_xdp_noinline.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_noinline type xdp ; data = (void *)(long)xdp->data; 224: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -112) 225: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) ; *(u32 *)data = dst->dst; 226: (63) *(u32 *)(r2 +0) = r1 invalid access to packet, off=0 size=4, R2(id=0,off=0,r=0) R2 offset is outside of the packet Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-12-14 14:17:34 -08:00
Martin KaFai Lau	c454a46b5e	bpf: Add bpf_line_info support ... This patch adds bpf_line_info support. It accepts an array of bpf_line_info objects during BPF_PROG_LOAD. The "line_info", "line_info_cnt" and "line_info_rec_size" are added to the "union bpf_attr". The "line_info_rec_size" makes bpf_line_info extensible in the future. The new "check_btf_line()" ensures the userspace line_info is valid for the kernel to use. When the verifier is translating/patching the bpf_prog (through "bpf_patch_insn_single()"), the line_infos' insn_off is also adjusted by the newly added "bpf_adj_linfo()". If the bpf_prog is jited, this patch also provides the jited addrs (in aux->jited_linfo) for the corresponding line_info.insn_off. "bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo()" is added to fill the aux->jited_linfo. It is currently called by the x86 jit. Other jits can also use "bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo()" and it will be done in the followup patches. In the future, if it deemed necessary, a particular jit could also provide its own "bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo()" implementation. A few "*line_info*" fields are added to the bpf_prog_info such that the user can get the xlated line_info back (i.e. the line_info with its insn_off reflecting the translated prog). The jited_line_info is available if the prog is jited. It is an array of __u64. If the prog is not jited, jited_line_info_cnt is 0. The verifier's verbose log with line_info will be done in a follow up patch. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-12-09 13:54:38 -08:00
Yonghong Song	ba64e7d852	bpf: btf: support proper non-jit func info ... Commit 838e96904f ("bpf: Introduce bpf_func_info") added bpf func info support. The userspace is able to get better ksym's for bpf programs with jit, and is able to print out func prototypes. For a program containing func-to-func calls, the existing implementation returns user specified number of function calls and BTF types if jit is enabled. If the jit is not enabled, it only returns the type for the main function. This is undesirable. Interpreter may still be used and we should keep feature identical regardless of whether jit is enabled or not. This patch fixed this discrepancy. Fixes: 838e96904f ("bpf: Introduce bpf_func_info") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-11-26 17:57:10 -08:00
Yonghong Song	838e96904f	bpf: Introduce bpf_func_info ... This patch added interface to load a program with the following additional information: . prog_btf_fd . func_info, func_info_rec_size and func_info_cnt where func_info will provide function range and type_id corresponding to each function. The func_info_rec_size is introduced in the UAPI to specify struct bpf_func_info size passed from user space. This intends to make bpf_func_info structure growable in the future. If the kernel gets a different bpf_func_info size from userspace, it will try to handle user request with part of bpf_func_info it can understand. In this patch, kernel can understand struct bpf_func_info { __u32 insn_offset; __u32 type_id; }; If user passed a bpf func_info record size of 16 bytes, the kernel can still handle part of records with the above definition. If verifier agrees with function range provided by the user, the bpf_prog ksym for each function will use the func name provided in the type_id, which is supposed to provide better encoding as it is not limited by 16 bytes program name limitation and this is better for bpf program which contains multiple subprograms. The bpf_prog_info interface is also extended to return btf_id, func_info, func_info_rec_size and func_info_cnt to userspace, so userspace can print out the function prototype for each xlated function. The insn_offset in the returned func_info corresponds to the insn offset for xlated functions. With other jit related fields in bpf_prog_info, userspace can also print out function prototypes for each jited function. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-11-20 10:54:39 -08:00
Quentin Monnet	a40a26322a	bpf: pass prog instead of env to bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep() ... Function bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep(), called from the kernel BPF verifier to run a driver-specific callback for preparing for the verification step for offloaded programs, takes a pointer to a struct bpf_verifier_env object. However, no driver callback needs the whole structure at this time: the two drivers supporting this, nfp and netdevsim, only need a pointer to the struct bpf_prog instance held by env. Update the callback accordingly, on kernel side and in these two drivers. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-11-10 15:39:54 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann	0962590e55	bpf: fix partial copy of map_ptr when dst is scalar ... ALU operations on pointers such as scalar_reg += map_value_ptr are handled in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Problem is however that map_ptr and range in the register state share a union, so transferring state through dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range is just buggy as any new map_ptr in the dst_reg is then truncated (or null) for subsequent checks. Fix this by adding a raw member and use it for copying state over to dst_reg. Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-10-31 16:53:17 -07:00
Quentin Monnet	c941ce9c28	bpf: add verifier callback to get stack usage info for offloaded progs ... In preparation for BPF-to-BPF calls in offloaded programs, add a new function attribute to the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops so that drivers supporting eBPF offload can hook at the end of program verification, and potentially extract information collected by the verifier. Implement a minimal callback (returning 0) in the drivers providing the structs, namely netdevsim and nfp. This will be useful in the nfp driver, in later commits, to extract the number of subprograms as well as the stack depth for those subprograms. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-10-08 10:24:12 +02:00
Joe Stringer	fd978bf7fd	bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier ... Allow helper functions to acquire a reference and return it into a register. Specific pointer types such as the PTR_TO_SOCKET will implicitly represent such a reference. The verifier must ensure that these references are released exactly once in each path through the program. To achieve this, this commit assigns an id to the pointer and tracks it in the 'bpf_func_state', then when the function or program exits, verifies that all of the acquired references have been freed. When the pointer is passed to a function that frees the reference, it is removed from the 'bpf_func_state` and all existing copies of the pointer in registers are marked invalid. Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-10-03 02:53:47 +02:00
Joe Stringer	c64b798328	bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type ... Teach the verifier a little bit about a new type of pointer, a PTR_TO_SOCKET. This pointer type is accessed from BPF through the 'struct bpf_sock' structure. Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-10-03 02:53:47 +02:00
Joe Stringer	f3709f69b7	bpf: Add iterator for spilled registers ... Add this iterator for spilled registers, it concentrates the details of how to get the current frame's spilled registers into a single macro while clarifying the intention of the code which is calling the macro. Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-10-03 02:53:46 +02:00
Edward Cree	679c782de1	bpf/verifier: per-register parent pointers ... By giving each register its own liveness chain, we elide the skip_callee() logic. Instead, each register's parent is the state it inherits from; both check_func_call() and prepare_func_exit() automatically connect reg states to the correct chain since when they copy the reg state across (r1-r5 into the callee as args, and r0 out as the return value) they also copy the parent pointer. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-08-29 18:52:12 -07:00
David S. Miller	5b79c2af66	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net ... Lots of easy overlapping changes in the confict resolutions here. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2018-05-26 19:46:15 -04:00
Linus Torvalds	03250e1028	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net ... Pull networking fixes from David Miller: "Let's begin the holiday weekend with some networking fixes: 1) Whoops need to restrict cfg80211 wiphy names even more to 64 bytes. From Eric Biggers. 2) Fix flags being ignored when using kernel_connect() with SCTP, from Xin Long. 3) Use after free in DCCP, from Alexey Kodanev. 4) Need to check rhltable_init() return value in ipmr code, from Eric Dumazet. 5) XDP handling fixes in virtio_net from Jason Wang. 6) Missing RTA_TABLE in rtm_ipv4_policy[], from Roopa Prabhu. 7) Need to use IRQ disabling spinlocks in mlx4_qp_lookup(), from Jack Morgenstein. 8) Prevent out-of-bounds speculation using indexes in BPF, from Daniel Borkmann. 9) Fix regression added by AF_PACKET link layer cure, from Willem de Bruijn. 10) Correct ENIC dma mask, from Govindarajulu Varadarajan. 11) Missing config options for PMTU tests, from Stefano Brivio" * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (48 commits) ibmvnic: Fix partial success login retries selftests/net: Add missing config options for PMTU tests mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks enic: set DMA mask to 47 bit ppp: remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl ipv4: remove warning in ip_recv_error net : sched: cls_api: deal with egdev path only if needed vhost: synchronize IOTLB message with dev cleanup packet: fix reserve calculation net/mlx5: IPSec, Fix a race between concurrent sandbox QP commands net/mlx5e: When RXFCS is set, add FCS data into checksum calculation bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation net/mlx4: Fix irq-unsafe spinlock usage net: phy: broadcom: Fix bcm_write_exp() net: phy: broadcom: Fix auxiliary control register reads net: ipv4: add missing RTA_TABLE to rtm_ipv4_policy net/mlx4: fix spelling mistake: "Inrerface" -> "Interface" and rephrase message ibmvnic: Only do H_EOI for mobility events tuntap: correctly set SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE virtio-net: fix leaking page for gso packet during mergeable XDP ...	2018-05-25 19:54:42 -07:00
Daniel Borkmann	c93552c443	bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation ... While reviewing the verifier code, I recently noticed that the following two program variants in relation to tail calls can be loaded. Variant 1: # bpftool p d x i 15 0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 1: (18) r2 = map[id:5] 3: (05) goto pc+2 4: (18) r2 = map[id:6] 6: (b7) r3 = 7 7: (35) if r3 >= 0xa0 goto pc+2 8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 255 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: (b7) r0 = 1 11: (95) exit # bpftool m s i 5 5: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 4 memlock 4096B # bpftool m s i 6 6: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 160 memlock 4096B Variant 2: # bpftool p d x i 20 0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 1: (18) r2 = map[id:8] 3: (05) goto pc+2 4: (18) r2 = map[id:7] 6: (b7) r3 = 7 7: (35) if r3 >= 0x4 goto pc+2 8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 3 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: (b7) r0 = 1 11: (95) exit # bpftool m s i 8 8: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 160 memlock 4096B # bpftool m s i 7 7: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 4 memlock 4096B In both cases the index masking inserted by the verifier in order to control out of bounds speculation from a CPU via b2157399cc ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") seems to be incorrect in what it is enforcing. In the 1st variant, the mask is applied from the map with the significantly larger number of entries where we would allow to a certain degree out of bounds speculation for the smaller map, and in the 2nd variant where the mask is applied from the map with the smaller number of entries, we get buggy behavior since we truncate the index of the larger map. The original intent from commit b2157399cc is to reject such occasions where two or more different tail call maps are used in the same tail call helper invocation. However, the check on the BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON is never hit since we never poisoned the saved pointer in the first place! We do this explicitly for map lookups but in case of tail calls we basically used the tail call map in insn_aux_data that was processed in the most recent path which the verifier walked. Thus any prior path that stored a pointer in insn_aux_data at the helper location was always overridden. Fix it by moving the map pointer poison logic into a small helper that covers both BPF helpers with the same logic. After that in fixup_bpf_calls() the poison check is then hit for tail calls and the program rejected. Latter only happens in unprivileged case since this is the *only* occasion where a rewrite needs to happen, and where such rewrite is specific to the map (max_entries, index_mask). In the privileged case the rewrite is generic for the insn->imm / insn->code update so multiple maps from different paths can be handled just fine since all the remaining logic happens in the instruction processing itself. This is similar to the case of map lookups: in case there is a collision of maps in fixup_bpf_calls() we must skip the inlined rewrite since this will turn the generic instruction sequence into a non- generic one. Thus the patch_call_imm will simply update the insn->imm location where the bpf_map_lookup_elem() will later take care of the dispatch. Given we need this 'poison' state as a check, the information of whether a map is an unpriv_array gets lost, so enforcing it prior to that needs an additional state. In general this check is needed since there are some complex and tail call intensive BPF programs out there where LLVM tends to generate such code occasionally. We therefore convert the map_ptr rather into map_state to store all this w/o extra memory overhead, and the bit whether one of the maps involved in the collision was from an unpriv_array thus needs to be retained as well there. Fixes: b2157399cc ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-05-24 08:15:43 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	af86ca4e30	bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack ... Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used and sanitize such patterns. 39: (bf) r3 = r10 40: (07) r3 += -216 41: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) // slow read 42: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -72) = 0 // verifier inserts this instruction 43: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +0) = r3 // this store becomes slow due to r8 44: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0) // cpu speculatively executes this load 45: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0) // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte' // is now sanitized Above code after x86 JIT becomes: e5: mov %rbp,%rdx e8: add $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx ef: mov 0x0(%r13),%r14 f3: movq $0x0,-0x48(%rbp) fb: mov %rdx,0x0(%r14) ff: mov 0x0(%rbx),%rdi 103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>	2018-05-19 20:44:24 +02:00
Mathieu Malaterre	be2d04d11f	bpf: add __printf verification to bpf_verifier_vlog ... __printf is useful to verify format and arguments. ‘bpf_verifier_vlog’ function is used twice in verifier.c in both cases the caller function already uses the __printf gcc attribute. Remove the following warning, triggered with W=1: kernel/bpf/verifier.c:176:2: warning: function might be possible candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-05-17 00:49:17 +02:00
Jiong Wang	9c8105bd44	bpf: centre subprog information fields ... It is better to centre all subprog information fields into one structure. This structure could later serve as function node in call graph. Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-05-04 11:58:36 +02:00
Jiong Wang	f910cefa32	bpf: unify main prog and subprog ... Currently, verifier treat main prog and subprog differently. All subprogs detected are kept in env->subprog_starts while main prog is not kept there. Instead, main prog is implicitly defined as the prog start at 0. There is actually no difference between main prog and subprog, it is better to unify them, and register all progs detected into env->subprog_starts. This could also help simplifying some code logic. Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-05-04 11:58:35 +02:00
Martin KaFai Lau	77d2e05abd	bpf: Add bpf_verifier_vlog() and bpf_verifier_log_needed() ... The BTF (BPF Type Format) verifier needs to reuse the current BPF verifier log. Hence, it requires the following changes: (1) Expose log_write() in verifier.c for other users. Its name is renamed to bpf_verifier_vlog(). (2) The BTF verifier also needs to check 'log->level && log->ubuf && !bpf_verifier_log_full(log);' independently outside of the current log_write(). It is because the BTF verifier will do one-check before making multiple calls to btf_verifier_vlog to log the details of a type. Hence, this check is also re-factored to a new function bpf_verifier_log_needed(). Since it is re-factored, we can check it before va_start() in the current bpf_verifier_log_write() and verbose(). Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-03-26 09:58:17 +02:00
Martin KaFai Lau	b9193c1b61	bpf: Rename bpf_verifer_log ... bpf_verifer_log => bpf_verifier_log Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-03-26 09:58:17 +02:00