On CTG and IVB+ we don't try to preserve any bits from the
DPFC_CONTROL register. Follow suit on ILK/SNB.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We set up all the bits for DPFC_CONTROL but forgot to actually
write them to the register. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Make the FBC plane macros take the plane as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The ILK/SNB docs don't really mention the the DPFC_HT_MODIFY bit.
CTG docs clearly state that it should be set only when tracking
back buffer modification in persistent mode. The bit is supposed
to be set by software after the first CPU modification to the
back buffer, and it would get automagically cleared by the hardware
on the next page flip.
Since we only track front buffer modification we don't need to set
this bit. GTT modification tracking still appears to work on ILK
and SNB with the bit unset. I don't have a CTG to verify how that
behaves.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The ILK/SNB docs are a bit unclear what the persistent mode does, but
the CTG docs clearly state that it was meant to be used when we're
tracking back buffer modifications. We never do that, so leave it in
non-persistent mode.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We use nuking instead of render tracking on IVB+, so there's
no point in writing IVB_FBC_RT_BASE.
v2: Drop the IVB_FBC_RT_BASE write too
v3: Move the SNB stuff elsewhere, leaving only IVB+ here
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because whatever.*
* This should contain a fairly long list of issues and still
unresolved resgressions, but I didn't really get a vote.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Those are two distinct concepts. Just use a comment to remind us to
remove that W/A at some point.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Conflicts are getting out of hand, and now we have to shuffle even
more in -next which was also shuffled in -fixes (the call for
drm_mode_config_reset needs to move yet again).
So do a proper backmerge. I wanted to wait with this for the 3.13
relaese, but alas let's just do this now.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
Besides the conflict around the forcewake get/put (where we chaged the
called function in -fixes and added a new parameter in -next) code all
the current conflicts are of the adjacent lines changed type.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
INSTPM is a masked register so use the _MASKED_BIT_{ENABLE,DISABLE}
macros when enabling/disabling self-refresh on 915GM.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
So shuffle the checks around a bit. Also give all the structs and
functions proper prefixes: i830_ for the dual-pipe mobile platforms
and i845_ for the two single-pipe desktop platforms.
Note that the max fifo value isn't actually correct for the i830M, but
since we don't frob the fifo split we don't actually need it. This is
different for some gen3 devices where we need the full fifo for self
refresh mode.
Cc: Thomas Richter <richter@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
My OCD just couldn't let this slide. Spotted while reviewing Ville's
patch to only flip planes when we have FBC.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This was introduced in:
commit 7c4a395ff8
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed Oct 9 19:17:56 2013 +0300
drm/i915: Don't re-compute pipe watermarks except for the affected pipe
and I missed fixing it in:
commit fec8cba306
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Wed Nov 27 11:10:26 2013 -0800
drm/i915: use crtc_htotal in watermark calculations to match fastboot v2
It's needed for ILK+ platforms to fastboot without crashing on a divide
by 0 after a DPMS on action.
Note: Ville mentioned in his review that this confusion seems to go
down to the original introduction of this code in
commit 801bcfffbb
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date: Fri May 31 10:08:35 2013 -0300
drm/i915: properly set HSW WM_PIPE registers
So it seems to have been missed both in the fastboot patch and in the
3d mode suppport (where only crtc_htotal reflects the real pipe
width).
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Add note based on Ville's review.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Avoid duplicating the same piece of code several times by separating
the watemark vfunc setup from the init_clock_gating vfunc setup on PCH
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We forgot to intialize the watermark vfuncs for BDW, and hence the
watermarks were never updated.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Looks like I forgot to update the ILK/SNB/IVB watermark patches to deal
with BDW. Add the relevant BDW checks to make sure we take the HSW
codepaths on BDW as well.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I need the tricky do_switch fix before I can merge the final piece of
the ppgtt enabling puzzle. Otherwise the conflict will be a real pain
to resolve since the do_switch hunk from -fixes must be placed at the
exact right place within a hunk in the next patch.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We use this hook starting from ILK onwards, so change the prefix
accordingly. Also rename functions/struct names used from
haswell_update_wm that are relevant to ILK already.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We now have a very clear method of disabling LP1+ wartermarks,
and we can actually detect if we actually did disable them, or
if they were already disabled. Use that to clean up the
WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling:ivb handling.
I was hoping to apply the workaround in a way that wouldn't
require a blocking wait, but sadly IVB really does appear to
require LP1+ watermarks to be off for an entire frame before
enabling sprite scaling. Simply disabling LP1+ watermarks
during the previous frame is not enough, no matter how early
in the frame we do it :(
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The new HSW watermark code can now handle ILK/SNB/IVB as well, so
switch them over. Kill the old code.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ILK doesn't like if we just write the LP1+ watermarks registers with 0.
We need to just disable the watermarks by clearing the enable bit. Use
that method also when disabling LP1+ watermarks in init_clock_gating.
It looks like disabling the sprite LP1 watermarks can cause underruns
even if we just toggle the WM1S_LP_EN bit. So treat that bit like the
actual watermark numbers and avoid setting it to 0 immediately.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Linetime watermarks don't exist on ILK/SNB/IVB, so don't compute them
except on HSW.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ILK has a bunch of issues with FBC. First of all, BSpec tells us that
FBC WM should never be enabled. Secondly when FBC is enabled
with FBC WM disabled, LP2+ watermarks must be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Multi-pipe LP1+ watermarks are a HSW+ feature, so let's not do it on
earlier generations.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On ILK disabling LP1+ watermarks must be done carefully to avoid
underruns. If we just write 0 to the register in the middle of the scan
cycle we often get an underrun. So instead we have to leave the actual
watermark levels in the register intact, and just toggle the enable bit.
Presumably the hardware takes a while to get out of low power mode, and
so the watermark level need to stay valid until that time.
We also have to be careful with the WM1S_LP_EN bit. It seems the
hardware more or less treats it like the actual watermarks numbers, and
so we must not toggle it too soon. Just leave it alone when disabling
the LP1+ watermarks.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ILK/SNB don't have LP2+ watermarks for sprites. Also the LP1 sprite
watermark register has its own enable bit. Take these differences
into account when programming the LP1+ registers.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On ILK/SNB only LP0/1 watermarks can be enabled when sprites are
enabled, and on ILK/SNB/IVB sprite scaling is limited to LP0 only.
So we can avoid computing the extra levels we're never going to use.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Add a new function ilk_wm_lp_latency() which will tell us what to write
into the WM_LPx register latency field. HSW is different from erlier
gens in this regard.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On IVB the display data buffer partitioning control lives in the
DISP_ARB_CTL2 register. Add the relevant defines/code for it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In the current code, at haswell_modeset_global_resources, first we
decide if we want to enable/disable the power well, then we decide if
we want to enable/disable PC8. On the case where we're enabling PC8
this works fine, but on the case where we disable PC8 due to a non-eDP
monitor being enabled, we first enable the power well and then disable
PC8. Although wrong, this doesn't seem to be causing any problems now,
and we don't even see anything in dmesg. But the patches for runtime
D3 turn this problem into a real bug, so we need to fix it.
This fixes the "modeset-non-lpsp" subtest from the "pm_pc8" test from
intel-gpu-tools.
v2: - Rebase (i915_disable_power_well).
v3: - More reabase.
v4: - Rebase on top of -fixes instead of -nightly.
This is commit d62292c8f7 in -next, but
we need it in -fixes to address Dave's report.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
WaVSRefCountFullforceMissDisable and
WaDSRefCountFullforceMissDisable
VS is a carry-over from HSW, and DS is likely not used by anyone yet.
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Line of 106 chars is too long. Really.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I stumbled on to some unimplemented errata. To be honest, I am not
really sure of the impact, just that the docs say to do.
No w/a name for this one.
v2: v1 was a stale thing which should have never seen the light of day.
(Haihao)
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Don't touch DPFC_RECOMP_CTL on FBC2, use RMW to update
the FBC_CONTROL on FBC1 to make it easier for people to
experiment with different numbers. Also fix the interval
mask for FBC1.
v2: Rebased
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Gen2 and gen3 don't have the FBC_CONTROL2 register, so don't
touch it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On gen2 the compressed frame buffer pitch is specified in 32B units
rather than the 64B units used on gen3+.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Fixes regression introduced by:
commit bf51d5e2cd
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
Date: Wed Jul 3 17:12:13 2013 -0300
drm/i915: switch disable_power_well default value to 1
The bug I'm seeing can be reproduced with:
- Have vgacon configured/enabled
- Make sure the power well gets disabled, then enabled. You can
check this by seeing the messages print by hsw_set_power_well
- Stop your display manager
- echo 0 > /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon1/bind
I can easily reproduce this by blacklising snd_hda_intel and booting
with eDP+HDMI.
If you do this and then look at dmesg, you'll see we're printing
infinite "Unclaimed register" messages. This is happening because
we're stuck on an infinite loop inside console_unlock(), which is
calling many functions from vgacon.c. And the code that's triggering
the error messages is from vgacon_set_cursor_size().
After we re-enable the power well, every time we read/write the VGA
address 0x3d5 we get an "unclaimed register" interrupt (ERR_INT) and
print error messages. If we write anything to the VGA MSR register (it
doesn't really matter which value you write to bit 0), any
reads/writes to 0x3d5 _don't_ trigger the "unclaimed register" errors
anymore (even if MSR bit 0 is zero). So what happens with the current
code is that when we unbind i915 and bind vgacon, we call
console_unlock(). Function console_unlock() is responsible for
printing any messages that were supposed to be print when the console
was locked, so it calls the TTY layer, which calls the console layer,
which calls vgacon to print the messages. At this point, vgacon
eventually calls vgacon_set_cursor_size(), which touches 0x3d5, which
triggers unclaimed register interrupts. The problem is that when we
get these interrupts, we print the error messages, so we add more work
to console_unlock(), which will try to print it again, and then call
vgacon again, trigger a new interrupt, which will put more stuff to
the buffer, and then we'll be stuck at console_unlock() forever.
If you patch intel_uncore.c to not print anything when we detect
unclaimed registers, we won't get into the console_unlock() infinite
loop and the driver unbind will work just fine. We will still be
getting interrupts every time vgacon touches those registers, but we
will survive. This is a valid experiment, but IMHO it's not the real
fix: if we don't print any error messages we will still keep getting
the interrupts, and if we disable ERR_INT we won't get the interrupt
anymore, but we will also stop getting all the other error interrupts.
I talked about this problem with the HW engineer and his
recommendation is "So don't do any VGA I/O or memory access while the
power well is disabled, and make to re-program MSR after enabling the
power well and before using VGA I/O or memory accesses.".
Notice that this is just a partial fix to fd.o #67813. This fixes the
case where the power well is already enabled when we unbind, not when
it's disabled when we unbind.
V2: - Rebase (first version was sent in September).
V3: - Complete rewrite of the same fix: smaller implementation,
improved commit message.
Testcase: igt/drv_module_reload
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67813
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I want to add more code to the post_enable function.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Just a bunch of regression fixes plus a few patches for long-standing
issues in gem corner-cases that we've hunted down in the past weeks. Since
apparently people hit those in the wild (and we also have nice igts for
them) I've opted for -fixes and cc: stable.
There's 1-2 things oustanding on top of this where I'm still waiting on
confirmation from testing, but nothing really scary.
* tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2013-12-11' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel:
drm/i915: don't update the dri1 breadcrumb with modesetting
drm/i915: Repeat eviction search after idling the GPU
drm/i915: Fix use-after-free in do_switch
drm/i915: fix pm init ordering
drm/i915: Hold mutex across i915_gem_release
drm/i915: Skip clock checks on BDW
drm/i915: Do not clobber config status after a forced restore of hw state
drm/i915: Take modeset locks around intel_modeset_setup_hw_state()
As promised bdw fixes come separate for now. Just a few minior things.
* 'bdw-fixes' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel:
drm/i915/bdw: PIPE_[BC] I[ME]R moved to powerwell
drm/i915/bdw: Limit GTT to 2GB
drm/i915/bdw: Add comment about gen8 HWS PGA
drm/i915/bdw: Free correct number of ppgtt pages
drm/i915/bdw: Do gen6 style reset for gen8
drm/i915/bdw: GEN8 backlight support
drm/i915/bdw: Add BDW to ULT macro
This patch adds the initial infrastructure to allow a Runtime PM
implementation that sets the device to its D3 state. The patch just
adds the necessary callbacks and the initial infrastructure.
We still don't have any platform that actually uses this
infrastructure, we still don't call get/put in all the places we need
to, and we don't have any function to save/restore the state of the
registers. This is not a problem since no platform uses the code added
by this patch. We have a few people simultaneously working on runtime
PM, so this initial code could help everybody make their plans.
V2: - Move some functions to intel_pm.c
- Remove useless pm_runtime_allow() call at init
- Remove useless pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() call at get
- Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of 2 calls
- Add a WARN to check if we're really awake
V3: - Rebase.
V4: - Don't need to call pci_{save,restore}_state and
pci_set_power_sate, since they're already called by the PCI
layer
- Remove wrong pm_runtime_enable() call at init_runtime_pm
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In the current code, at haswell_modeset_global_resources, first we
decide if we want to enable/disable the power well, then we decide if
we want to enable/disable PC8. On the case where we're enabling PC8
this works fine, but on the case where we disable PC8 due to a non-eDP
monitor being enabled, we first enable the power well and then disable
PC8. Although wrong, this doesn't seem to be causing any problems now,
and we don't even see anything in dmesg. But the patches for runtime
D3 turn this problem into a real bug, so we need to fix it.
This fixes the "modeset-non-lpsp" subtest from the "pm_pc8" test from
intel-gpu-tools.
v2: - Rebase (i915_disable_power_well).
v3: - More reabase.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSogqUAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGM2MIAJrr5KEXEWuuAR4+JkkWBK7A
+dVT4n1MM4wP/aCIyriSlq7kgT03Wxk4Q4wKsj2wZvDQkNgEQjrctgIihc75jqi5
126nmT3YXJLwgDpFA3RHZUWve3j3vfUG53rRuk7K9Xx1sGWU3Ls7BuInvQZ//+QS
6UB4UuEAalmose5U8ToXQfMqZhjwreZKeb64TEZwFvu2klv4cnka1L/zHbmQGgRg
2Pfv+aUrjsYE8s9lkEKX8MIQsDn28Q5Lsv7XIEQwo2at4rYbJaxX6usuC1OI0MQ5
BLUn1GgtvOidq6FzSg6kXiA/MJYH3J0S+p4uULWAprxA+KeJRbWNRroM94W1qAk=
=1Wcq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v3.13-rc3' into drm-intel-next-queued
Linux 3.13-rc3
I need a backmerge for two reasons:
- For merging the ppgtt patches from Ben I need to pull in the bdw
support.
- We now have duplicated calls to intel_uncore_forcewake_reset in the
setup code to due 2 different patches merged into -next and 3.13.
The conflict is silen so I need the merge to be able to apply
Deepak's fixup patch.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Trivial conflict, it doesn't even show up in the merge diff.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Shovel a bit more of the the code into the setup function, and call
it earlier. Otherwise lockdep is unhappy since we cancel the delayed
resume work before it's initialized.
While at it also shovel the pc8 setup code into the same functions.
I wanted to also ditch the header declaration of the hws pc8 functions,
but for unfathomable reasons that stuff is in intel_display.c instead
of intel_pm.c.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71980
Tested-by: Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Initialize the FBC vfuncs on gen2 and gen3 chipsets. Also make
a clean split for gen7+ vs. gen5+ vfunc initialization.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On gen2 and gen3 chipsets FBC is supported only on plane A. Fix (and
simplify) the plane checks in intel_update_fbc() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Atm we call intel_display_power_enabled() from
i915_capture_error_state() in IRQ context and then take a mutex. To fix
this add a new intel_display_power_enabled_sw() which returns the domain
state based on software tracking as opposed to reading the actual HW
state.
Since we use domain_use_count for this without locking on the reader
side make sure we increase the counter only after enabling all required
power wells and decrease it before disabling any of these power wells.
Regression introduced in
commit 1b02383464b4a915627ef3b8fd0ad7f07168c54c
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date: Tue Sep 24 16:17:09 2013 +0300
drm/i915: support for multiple power wells
Note that atm we depend on the value returned by
intel_display_power_enabled_sw() in i915_capture_error_state() to avoid
unclaimed register access reports. This was never guaranteed though,
since another thread can disable the power concurrently. If this is a
problem we need another explicit way to disable the reporting during
error captures.
v2:
- remove barriers as the caller can't depend on the value
returned from i915_capture_error_state_sw() anyway (Ville)
- dump the state of pipe/transcoder power domain state (Daniel)
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
