This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is
'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for it is:
0: Include Y-coordinate valid eDP1.4a
1: Do not include Y-coordinate valid eDP 1.4
So not setting it.
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-4-jose.souza@intel.com
This will be helpful to debug what hardware is actually tracking
and causing PSR to exit.
BSpec: 7721
v4:
- Using _MMIO_TRANS2() in PSR_EVENT
- Cleaning events before printing
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Any write in any display register was causing HW to exit PSR,
masking it to allow more power savings. Writes to pipe related
registers will still cause HW to exit PSR.
This is already masked for PSR2.
It also do not break the Display WA #0884, writes to CURSURFLIVE
are still causing hardware to exit PSR. This was tested in CNL machine
by triggering a write to CURSURFLIVE when a debugfs was read by user.
Bspec: 7721 and 8042
v4: Checked that it do not breaks WA #0884 and added this information
to the commit message.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Timestamps are useful for IGT tests that trigger PSR exit and/or wait for
PSR entry.
v2: Removed seqlock (Ville)
Removed erroneous warning in irq loop (Chris)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180403212420.25007-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Interrupts other than the one for AUX errors are required only for debug,
so unmask them via debugfs when the user requests debug.
User can make such a request with
echo 1 > <DEBUG_FS>/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_debug
There are no locks to serialize PSR debug enabling from
irq_postinstall() and debugfs for simplicity. As irq_postinstall() is
called only during module initialization/resume and IGT subtests
aren't expected to modify PSR debug at those times, we should be safe.
v2: Unroll loops (Ville)
Avoid resetting error mask bits.
v3: Unmask interrupts in postinstall() if debug was still enabled.
Avoid RMW (Ville)
v4: Avoid extra IMR write introduced in the previous version.(Jose)
Style changes, renames (Jose).
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405013717.24254-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and
wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so
without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe
PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and
requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently
setting our pointer to NULL.
Fixes: 995d304774 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In the 2 eDP1.4a pannels tested set or not set bit have no effect
but is better set it and comply with specification.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-9-jose.souza@intel.com
This value do not change overtime so better cache it than
fetch it every PSR enable.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-8-jose.souza@intel.com
Sink can support our PSR2 requirements but userspace can request
a resolution that PSR2 hardware do not support, in this case it
was overwritten the PSR2 sink support.
Adding another flag here, this way if requested resolution changed
to a value that PSR2 hardware can handle, PSR2 can be enabled.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-6-jose.souza@intel.com
For Geminilake and Cannonlake+ the Y-coordinate support must be
enabled in PSR2_CTL too.
Spec: 7713 and 7720
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-5-jose.souza@intel.com
Although i915 don't implement aux sync frame through tests was
findout that pannels can do selective update when the y-coordinate
is also included in SDP, that is why it is required to run PSR2 in
i915.
So moving to only one place the sink requirements that the actual
driver needs to enable PSR2.
Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config
is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for
Y coordinate requirement.
This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code that
was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y
coordinate).
Also here renaming intel_dp_get_y_cord_status() to
intel_dp_get_y_coord_required() as it more accurate to the name and
function of bit according to eDP spec.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-4-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states that aux frame is required to do PSR2 selective
update but i915 don't fully implement it. It sends the aux frame
sync messages but the value is always zero as the GTC is not enabled
in driver.
Through tests was findout that pannels can do selective update when
the y-coordinate is also included in SDP, that is why it is required
to run PSR2 in i915.
A dummy value is not useful at all to sink, so removing everything
related to aux frame sync, if GTC is enabled we can bring this back.
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-3-jose.souza@intel.com
HSW and BDW have SRD_AUX_{CTL, STATUS} registers that the driver needs to
setup for the HW to use whenever exiting PSR. SKL+ hardware use hardcoded
values for the same and do not need any registers to be setup. So, use
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb() for a one-time write during PSR enable and setup the
PSR aux registers on HSW and BDW for later use by HW.
We also end up writing to reserved bits in SRD_AUX_CTL by reusing
intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl() for HSW and BDW, fix this.
Since the AUX register setup is source side programming, move the call
to enable_source() from enable_sink().
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180313034646.3721-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
No functional change. But let's keep definitions clean
and cursor related register definitions together.
v2: Fix caps x no caps on same reg. Change name to match
original reg name. (by Ville).
Also fix name on code s/surlive/surflive and on subject
s/cur_surlife/cur surflive/.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180312210528.7905-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything
and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many
modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones.
One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same
infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms.
But also because when this infrastructure was created
the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable
how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases.
However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died
on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW
tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind.
By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe
someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't
allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising
the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only
the damaged area and do a partial screen update.
So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's
rely more on HW tracking.
This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated
by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious
bugs.
v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking.
v3 from DK
Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
WA 0884:bxt:all,cnl:*:A - "When FBC is enabled with eDP PSR,
the CPU host modify writes may not get updated on the Display
as expected.
WA: Write 0x00000000 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A with every CPU
host modify write to trigger PSR exit."
We can also find on spec other cases where they describe
bogus writes to cursor registers to force PSR exit with
HW tracking. And it was confirmed by HW engineers that
this Wa can be safely applied for any frontbuffer activity.
So let's use this more and more here instead of forcibly
disable and re-enable PSR everytime that we have a simple
reliable flush case.
Other commits improve the fbcon/fbdev use a lot, but this
approach is the only when where we can get a fully reliable
console with no slowness or missed frames and PSR still
enabled and active.
v2: - Rebase on drm-tip
- (DK) Add a comment to explain that WA
tells about writing 0 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A but we write to
CUR_SURFLIVE(pipe).
v3: Wa doesn't work on PSR2.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180309005218.26772-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
In fact, apply the Cannonlake resolution check for all >= Gen-10 platforms
to be safe.
v3: Update GLK too. (Ville)
Longer variable names.
if-else in place of ternary operator.
v2: Use local variables for resolution limits and print them (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Elio Martinez Monroy <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306203355.29292-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
We can still use PSR1 when PSR2 conditions are not met.
So, let's split the check in a way that we make sure has_psr
gets set independently of PSR2 criteria.
v2: Duh! Handle proper return to avoid breaking PSR2.
v3: (DK):
- better name for psr2 conditions check function
- Don't remove FIXME block and psr2.support check.
- Add a debug message to show us what PSR or PSR2 is
getting enabled now we have ways to enabled PSR on
PSR2 panels.
- s/PSR2 disabled/PSR2 not enabled
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
According to spec:
"PSR2 is supported for pipe active sizes up to
3640 pixels wide and 2304 lines tall."
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
eDP spec says - "If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the
EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit d7) must be set
to 1."
Reject PSR on panels without this cap bit set as such panels cannot be
controlled via SET_POWER & SET_DP_PWR_VOLTAGE register and the DP source
needs to be able to do that for PSR.
Thanks to Nathan for debugging this.
Panel cap checks like this can be done just once, let's fix this
when PSR dpcd init movement lands.
Cc: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227032723.15474-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
The cap check should be specifically for bit 0 instead of any bit.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fixes: 474d1ec4a3 ("drm/i915/skl: Enabling PSR2 SU with frame sync")
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
intel_edp_init_dpcd() is cluttered with PSR specific DPCD checks and
intel_dp.c is huge.
No functional change intended.
v2: Rebased.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
PSR on CNL requires AUX IO wells to be kept on and the existing AUX domain
for AUX-A enables DC_OFF well too. This is not required, so add a new
AUX_IO_A domain for AUX-A to allow DC states to remain enabled. Other AUX
channels re-use the existing AUX domains.
v4: Reword comment (Rodrigo and Ville)
Rename _get and _put functions to include aux_io substring(Rodrigo)
Remove unnecessary diff that got included.
v3: Extract aux domain selection into a function (Ville)
v2: Add AUX IO domain only for AUX-A
Rebased on top of Ville's AUX series.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
DPCD read for the eDP is complete by the time intel_psr_init() is
called, which means we can avoid initializing PSR structures and state
if there is no sink support.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180103213824.1405-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
The global variable dev_priv->psr.sink_support is set if an eDP sink
supports PSR. Use this instead of redoing the check with is_edp_psr().
Combine source and sink support checks into a macro that can be used to
return early from psr_{invalidate, single_frame_update, flush}.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180103213824.1405-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
This flag has become redundant since
commit 4d90f2d507 ("drm/i915: Start tracking PSR state in crtc state")
It is set at the same place as psr.enabled, which is also exposed via
debugfs.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180103213824.1405-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Commit 77affa3172 ("drm/i915/psr: Fix compiler warnings for
hsw_psr_disable()") swapped status and control registers while fixing
indentation. The _ctl at the end of the status register name must have to
led to this.
Fixes: 77affa3172 ("drm/i915/psr: Fix compiler warnings for hsw_psr_disable()")
References: https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/cmabridge/
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171220043520.2599-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Now that the infoframe hooks are part of the intel_dig_port, we can use
the normal .write_infoframe() hook to update the VSC SDP. We do need to
deal with the size difference between the VSC DIP and the others though.
Another minor snag is that the compiler will complain to use if we keep
using enum hdmi_infoframe_type type and passing in the DP define instead,
so et's just change to unsigned int all over for the inforframe type.
v2: Rebase due to other PSR changes
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171013194051.19286-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Add the minimal amount of PSR tracking into the crtc state. This allows
precomputing the possibility of using PSR correctly, and it means we can
safely call the psr enable/disable functions for any DP endcoder.
As a nice bonus we get rid of some more crtc->config usage, which we
want to kill off eventually.
v2: Fix 'goto unlock' fail in intel_psr_enable() (Jani)
Check intel_dp_is_edp() in is_edp_psr() (Jani)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171012130201.21318-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Our global struct with params is named exactly the same way
as new preferred name for the drm_i915_private function parameter.
To avoid such name reuse lets use different name for the global.
v5: pure rename
v6: fix
Credits-to: Coccinelle
@@
identifier n;
@@
(
- i915.n
+ i915_modparams.n
)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170919193846.38060-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Some platforms do not support PSR and DRRS simultaneously.
Visual artifacts and flickering were reported on BDW HP Spectre
x360 Convertible. Deferring to PSR when both PSR and DRRS are
supported by the panel.
V2: Minor code-style changes suggested by Rodrigo
V3: Add a WARN_ON during PSR init suggested by Dhinakaran
Correct debug message,title suggested by Jani
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101111
Cc: Nicholas Stommel <nicholas.stommel@gmail.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170914181641.24393-1-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
DK had pointed out a comment there was hard to understand, so I
tried to read back again and I couldn't understand that as well.
So let me re-phrase that in a way that anyone can understand
later, even myself.
Also fixed the comment block style.
v2: Accept DK's suggestion on PSR_state 2 and PSR_state 3 named
as spec.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170912183059.5086-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Continue on VLV PSR split with vfunc, let's also create one
for enabling source.
Also since we are touching *_enable_source functions let's
fix a comment with wrong name for vlv's one.
v2: Fix typo on commit message (DK).
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-12-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Continue on VLV PSR split with vfunc, let's also create
one for setting up VSC.
v2: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-10-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Let's move the activation calls together after enable is done.
No real functional change should be expected here. Just an attempt
to get it clear when we are really activating PSR after enabling it.
v2: Add braces on if/else because commit message there is too long
as suggested by Jani.
v3: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-9-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
No functional change is expected here since at this point
PSR is not allowed to go to any active state. In other
words, not really enabled.
However let's do in a separated patch so it gets clear
on what is change and specially it can helps on bisect
case if we figure something has caused changes in behaviour.
But this needs to be done before we make the vfunc to
enable source to be in parity with VLV implementation.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-8-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
This sequence is part of enable source anyways, but they
only need to be executed once and not on every activation,
So let's re-create hsw_enable_source.
v2: Avoid changing order here to avoid changing behaviour
as suggested by Jani.
v3: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-7-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
VSC package is decided per eDP spec for psr1 or psr2,
and not per platform, so let's unify it and kill "skl"
func.
v2: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-6-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
On HSW+ the real activate of PSR is decided by the source
after certain amount of configured idle frames.
However for the driver perspective where we track psr.active
variable this function here is the actual activate one. So
let's rename it before moving to vfunc with that.
v2: Fix typo on commit message (DK).
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-4-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
VLV/CHV has a total different PSR implementation than the
other platforms, so let's start moving that to vfuncs.
Let's start with disable_src one.
v2: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
We really don't want to setup vfuncs and lock mutexes on
platforms that has no support to PSR.
Also we know what platforms they are so let's do it quietly.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
The PSR enable/disable need to know things about the crtc state, so
plumb it through. This will become even more important when we start
to reuse the generic infoframe code for the VSC DIP programming as the
infoframe code wants the crtc state as well.
v2: Fix kernel docs
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170818134958.15502-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
