Implement support for the CPU interface register access driven by MMIO
address offsets from the CPU interface base address. Useful for user
space to support save/restore of the VGIC state.
This commit adds support only for the same logic as the current VGIC
support, and no more. For example, the active priority registers are
handled as RAZ/WI, just like setting priorities on the emulated
distributor.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Handle MMIO accesses to the two registers which should support both the
case where the VMs want to read/write either of these registers and the
case where user space reads/writes these registers to do save/restore of
the VGIC state.
Note that the added complexity compared to simple set/clear enable
registers stems from the bookkeping of source cpu ids. It may be
possible to change the underlying data structure to simplify the
complexity, but since this is not in the critical path at all, this will
do.
Also note that reading this register from a live guest will not be
accurate compared to on hardware, because some state may be living on
the CPU LRs and the only way to give a consistent read would be to force
stop all the VCPUs and request them to unqueu the LR state onto the
distributor. Until we have an actual user of live reading this
register, we can live with the difference.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To properly access the VGIC state from user space it is very unpractical
to have to loop through all the LRs in all register access functions.
Instead, support moving all pending state from LRs to the distributor,
but leave active state LRs alone.
Note that to accurately present the active and pending state to VCPUs
reading these distributor registers from a live VM, we would have to
stop all other VPUs than the calling VCPU and ask each CPU to unqueue
their LR state onto the distributor and add fields to track active state
on the distributor side as well. We don't have any users of such
functionality yet and there are other inaccuracies of the GIC emulation,
so don't provide accurate synchronized access to this state just yet.
However, when the time comes, having this function should help.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Add infrastructure to handle distributor and cpu interface register
accesses through the KVM_{GET/SET}_DEVICE_ATTR interface by adding the
KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_DIST_REGS and KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS groups
and defining the semantics of the attr field to be the MMIO offset as
specified in the GICv2 specs.
Missing register accesses or other changes in individual register access
functions to support save/restore of the VGIC state is added in
subsequent patches.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Rename the vgic_ranges array to vgic_dist_ranges to be more specific and
to prepare for handling CPU interface register access as well (for
save/restore of VGIC state).
Pass offset from distributor or interface MMIO base to
find_matching_range function instead of the physical address of the
access in the VM memory map. This allows other callers unaware of the
VM specifics, but with generic VGIC knowledge to reuse the function.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Support setting the distributor and cpu interface base addresses in the
VM physical address space through the KVM_{SET,GET}_DEVICE_ATTR API
in addition to the ARM specific API.
This has the added benefit of being able to share more code in user
space and do things in a uniform manner.
Also deprecate the older API at the same time, but backwards
compatibility will be maintained.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Support creating the ARM VGIC device through the KVM_CREATE_DEVICE
ioctl, which can then later be leveraged to use the
KVM_{GET/SET}_DEVICE_ATTR, which is useful both for setting addresses in
a more generic API than the ARM-specific one and is useful for
save/restore of VGIC state.
Adds KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL to ARM capabilities.
Note that we change the check for creating a VGIC from bailing out if
any VCPUs were created, to bailing out if any VCPUs were ever run. This
is an important distinction that shouldn't break anything, but allows
creating the VGIC after the VCPUs have been created.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Rework the VGIC initialization slightly to allow initialization of the
vgic cpu-specific state even if the irqchip (the VGIC) hasn't been
created by user space yet. This is safe, because the vgic data
structures are already allocated when the CPU is allocated if VGIC
support is compiled into the kernel. Further, the init process does not
depend on any other information and the sacrifice is a slight
performance degradation for creating VMs in the no-VGIC case.
The reason is that the new device control API doesn't mandate creating
the VGIC before creating the VCPU and it is unreasonable to require user
space to create the VGIC before creating the VCPUs.
At the same time move the irqchip_in_kernel check out of
kvm_vcpu_first_run_init and into the init function to make the per-vcpu
and global init functions symmetric and add comments on the exported
functions making it a bit easier to understand the init flow by only
looking at vgic.c.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Initialize the cntvoff at kvm_init_vm time, not before running the VCPUs
at the first time because that will overwrite any potentially restored
values from user space.
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zynger <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
For bytemaps each IRQ field is 1 byte wide, so we pack 4 irq fields in
one word and since there are 32 private (per cpu) irqs, we have 8
private u32 fields on the vgic_bytemap struct. We shift the offset from
the base of the register group right by 2, giving us the word index
instead of the field index. But then there are 8 private words, not 4,
which is also why we subtract 8 words from the offset of the shared
words.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
All the code in handle_mmio_cfg_reg() assumes the offset has
been shifted right to accomodate for the 2:1 bit compression,
but this is only done when getting the register address.
Shift the offset early so the code works mostly unchanged.
Reported-by: Zhaobo (Bob, ERC) <zhaobo@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
vgic_get_target_reg is quite complicated, for no good reason.
Actually, it is fairly easy to write it in a much more efficient
way by using the target CPU array instead of the bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
As KVM/arm64 is looming on the horizon, it makes sense to move some
of the common code to a single location in order to reduce duplication.
The code could live anywhere. Actually, most of KVM is already built
with a bunch of ugly ../../.. hacks in the various Makefiles, so we're
not exactly talking about style here. But maybe it is time to start
moving into a less ugly direction.
The include files must be in a "public" location, as they are accessed
from non-KVM files (arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c).
For this purpose, introduce two new locations:
- virt/kvm/arm/ : x86 and ia64 already share the ioapic code in
virt/kvm, so this could be seen as a (very ugly) precedent.
- include/kvm/ : there is already an include/xen, and while the
intent is slightly different, this seems as good a location as
any
Eventually, we should probably have independant Makefiles at every
levels (just like everywhere else in the kernel), but this is just
the first step.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
