Commit Graph

166 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dave Airlie
41206a073c Linux 5.8-rc6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQFSBAABCAA8FiEEq68RxlopcLEwq+PEeb4+QwBBGIYFAl8UzA4eHHRvcnZhbGRz
 QGxpbnV4LWZvdW5kYXRpb24ub3JnAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGQ7cH/3v+Gv+SmHJCvaT2
 CSu0+7okVnYbY3UTb3hykk7/aOqb6284KjxR03r0CWFzsEsZVhC5pvvruASSiMQg
 Pi04sLqv6CsGLHd1n+pl4AUYEaxq6k4KS3uU3HHSWxrahDDApQoRUx2F8lpOxyj8
 RiwnoO60IMPA7IFJqzcZuFqsgdxqiiYvnzT461KX8Mrw6fyMXeR2KAj2NwMX8dZN
 At21Sf8+LSoh6q2HnugfiUd/jR10XbfxIIx2lXgIinb15GXgWydEQVrDJ7cUV7ix
 Jd0S+dtOtp+lWtFHDoyjjqqsMV7+G8i/rFNZoxSkyZqsUTaKzaR6JD3moSyoYZgG
 0+eXO4A=
 =9EpR
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge v5.8-rc6 into drm-next

I've got a silent conflict + two trees based on fixes to merge.

Fixes a silent merge with amdgpu

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2020-07-24 08:48:05 +10:00
Chris Wilson
cf1976b113 drm/i915: Also drop vm.ref along error paths for vma construction
Not only do we need to release the vm.ref we acquired for the vma on the
duplicate insert branch, but also for the normal error paths, so roll
them all into one.

Reported-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Fixes: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200702211015.29604-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 03fca66b7a)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2020-07-06 17:16:03 -07:00
Chris Wilson
42723673a1 drm/i915: Drop vm.ref for duplicate vma on construction
As we allow for parallel threads to create the same vma instance
concurrently, and we only filter out the duplicates upon reacquiring the
spinlock for the rbtree, we have to free the loser of the constructors'
race. When freeing, we should also drop any resource references acquired
for the redundant vma.

Fixes: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200702083225.20044-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 2377427cdd)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2020-07-06 17:16:00 -07:00
Chris Wilson
2377427cdd drm/i915: Drop vm.ref for duplicate vma on construction
As we allow for parallel threads to create the same vma instance
concurrently, and we only filter out the duplicates upon reacquiring the
spinlock for the rbtree, we have to free the loser of the constructors'
race. When freeing, we should also drop any resource references acquired
for the redundant vma.

Fixes: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200702083225.20044-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-07-02 13:48:00 +01:00
Chris Wilson
51dc276dd2 drm/i915: Leave vma intact as they are discarded
If we find ourselves trying to reuse a misplaced but active vma, we
currently try to discard it to avoid having to wait to unbind it
(upsetting the current user fo the vma). An alternative to marking it as
a dicarded vma and keeping it in both the obj->vma.list and
obj->vma.tree, is to simply remove it from the lookup rbtree.

While it remains in the list of vma, it will be unbound under eviction
pressure and freed along with the object. We will never reuse it again
for new instances. As before, with no pruning, the list may continually
grow, but eventually we will have the most constrained version of the
ggtt view that meets all requirements -- so the list of vma should not
grow without bound.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2012
Fixes: 9bdcaa5e3a ("drm/i915: Discard a misplaced GGTT vma")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611180421.23262-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-06-12 10:13:07 +01:00
Chris Wilson
bffa18dd0b drm/i915/gt: Remove local entries from GGTT on suspend
Across suspend/resume, we clear the entire GGTT and rebuild from
scratch. In particular, we want to only preserve the global entries for
use by the HW, and delay reinstating the local binds until required by
the user. This means that we can evict any local binds in the global GTT,
saving any time in preserving their state, as they will be rebound on
demand.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1947
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200528082427.21402-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-28 16:55:15 +01:00
Chris Wilson
aedbe0a1af drm/i915: Remove PIN_UPDATE for i915_vma_pin
As we no longer use PIN_UPDATE (since commit 7d0aa0db43 ("drm/i915/gem:
Unbind all current vma on changing cache-level")) we can remove
PIN_UPDATE itself. The benefit is just in simplifing the vma bind.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200521144949.25357-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-05-21 17:33:51 +01:00
Chris Wilson
50689771c8 drm/i915: Only close vma we open
The history of i915_vma_close() is confusing, as is its use. As the
lifetime of the i915_vma is currently bounded by the object it is
attached to, we needed a means of identify when a vma was no longer in
use by userspace (via the user's fd). This is further complicated by
that only ppgtt vma should be closed at the user's behest, as the ggtt
were always shared.

Now that we attach the vma to a lut on the user's context, the open
count does indicate how many unique and open context/vm are referencing
this vma from the user. As such, we can and should just use the
open_count to track when the vma is still in use by userspace.

It's a poor man's replacement for reference counting.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1193
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422190558.30509-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-24 11:24:45 +01:00
Chris Wilson
cb593e5d2b drm/i915/gem: Hold obj->vma.lock over for_each_ggtt_vma()
While the ggtt vma are protected by their object lifetime, the list
continues until it hits a non-ggtt vma, and that vma is not protected
and may be freed as we inspect it. Hence, we require the obj->vma.lock
to protect the list as we iterate.

An example of forgetting to hold the obj->vma.lock is

[1642834.464973] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000122: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[1642834.464977] CPU: 3 PID: 1954 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 5.6.0-300.fc32.x86_64 #1
[1642834.464979] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS25701/20ARS25701, BIOS GJET94WW (2.44 ) 09/14/2017
[1642834.465021] RIP: 0010:i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x2c0/0x3e0 [i915]
[1642834.465024] Code: 8b 84 24 18 01 00 00 f6 c4 80 74 59 49 8b 94 24 a0 00 00 00 49 8b 84 24 e0 00 00 00 49 8b 74 24 10 48 8b 92 30 01 00 00 89 c7 <80> ba 0a 06 00 00 03 0f 87 86 00 00 00 ba 00 00 08 00 b9 00 00 10
[1642834.465025] RSP: 0018:ffffa98780c77d60 EFLAGS: 00010282
[1642834.465028] RAX: ffff8d232bfb2578 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffff8d25873a0000
[1642834.465029] RDX: dead000000000122 RSI: fffff0af8ac6e408 RDI: 000000002bfb2578
[1642834.465030] RBP: ffff8d25873a0000 R08: ffff8d252bfb5638 R09: 0000000000000000
[1642834.465031] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8d252bfb5640 R12: ffffa987801cb8f8
[1642834.465032] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8d233e972e50 R15: ffff8d233e972d00
[1642834.465034] FS:  00007f6a3d327f00(0000) GS:ffff8d25926c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[1642834.465036] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1642834.465037] CR2: 00007f6a2064d000 CR3: 00000002fb57c001 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[1642834.465038] Call Trace:
[1642834.465083]  i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x122/0x230 [i915]
[1642834.465121]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915]
[1642834.465151]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0x86/0xd0 [drm]
[1642834.465156]  ? avc_has_perm+0x3b/0x160
[1642834.465178]  drm_ioctl+0x206/0x390 [drm]
[1642834.465216]  ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915]
[1642834.465221]  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x122/0x1c0
[1642834.465226]  ? __do_munmap+0x24b/0x4d0
[1642834.465231]  ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0
[1642834.465235]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[1642834.465238]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0xf0
[1642834.465243]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[1642834.465245] RIP: 0033:0x7f6a3d7b047b
[1642834.465247] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 1d aa 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ed a9 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[1642834.465249] RSP: 002b:00007ffe71adba28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[1642834.465251] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f99048fa40 RCX: 00007f6a3d7b047b
[1642834.465253] RDX: 00007ffe71adba30 RSI: 00000000c0106461 RDI: 000000000000000e
[1642834.465254] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000055f98f3f1798 R09: 0000000000000002
[1642834.465255] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000080
[1642834.465257] R13: 000055f98f3f1690 R14: 00000000c0106461 R15: 00007ffe71adba30

Now to take the spinlock during the list iteration, we need to break it
down into two phases. In the first phase under the lock, we cannot sleep
and so must defer the actual work to a second list, protected by the
ggtt->mutex.

We also need to hold the spinlock during creation of a new vma to
serialise with updates of the tiling on the object.

Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Fixes: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422072805.17340-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-22 15:43:56 +01:00
Chris Wilson
442dbc5c68 drm/i915: Make exclusive awaits on i915_active optional
Later use will require asynchronous waits on the active timelines, but
will not utilize an async wait on the exclusive channel. Make the await
on the exclusive fence explicit in the selection flags.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200406155840.1728-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-06 19:48:05 +01:00
Chris Wilson
614654abe8 drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind
Do an early rejection of a i915_vma_unbind() attempt if the i915_vma is
currently pinned, without waiting to see if the inflight operations may
unpin it. We see this problem with the shrinker trying to unbind the
active vma from inside its bind worker:

<6> [472.618968] Workqueue: events_unbound fence_work [i915]
<4> [472.618970] Call Trace:
<4> [472.618974]  ? __schedule+0x2e5/0x810
<4> [472.618978]  schedule+0x37/0xe0
<4> [472.618982]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20
<4> [472.618984]  __mutex_lock+0x281/0x9c0
<4> [472.618987]  ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
<4> [472.618989]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x60
<4> [472.619038]  ? i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915]
<4> [472.619084]  ? i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915]
<4> [472.619122]  i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915]
<4> [472.619165]  i915_gem_object_unbind+0x1dc/0x400 [i915]
<4> [472.619208]  i915_gem_shrink+0x328/0x660 [i915]
<4> [472.619250]  ? i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915]
<4> [472.619282]  i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915]
<4> [472.619325]  vm_alloc_page.constprop.25+0x1aa/0x240 [i915]
<4> [472.619330]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4d/0x80
<4> [472.619363]  ? __alloc_pd+0xb/0x30 [i915]
<4> [472.619366]  ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0xf/0x30
<4> [472.619368]  ? __module_address+0x23/0xe0
<4> [472.619371]  ? is_module_address+0x26/0x40
<4> [472.619374]  ? static_obj+0x34/0x50
<4> [472.619376]  ? lockdep_init_map+0x4d/0x1e0
<4> [472.619407]  setup_page_dma+0xd/0x90 [i915]
<4> [472.619437]  alloc_pd+0x29/0x50 [i915]
<4> [472.619470]  __gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0x443/0x6b0 [i915]
<4> [472.619503]  gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0xd7/0x300 [i915]
<4> [472.619535]  ppgtt_bind_vma+0x2a/0xe0 [i915]
<4> [472.619577]  __vma_bind+0x26/0x40 [i915]
<4> [472.619611]  fence_work+0x1c/0x90 [i915]
<4> [472.619617]  process_one_work+0x26a/0x620

Fixes: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200403120150.17091-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-03 19:39:57 +01:00
Chris Wilson
9657aaa205 drm/i915: Revoke mmap before fence
Make sure we revoke the user's mmaps of this vma to force them to take a
pagefault *before* we remove the associated aperture detiling register.

Fixes: 0d86ee3509 ("drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200403160951.8271-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-03 18:39:37 +01:00
Chris Wilson
9da0ea0963 drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count
We cached the number of vma bound to the object in order to speed up
shrinker decisions. This has been superseded by being more proactive in
removing objects we cannot shrink from the shrinker lists, and so we can
drop the clumsy attempt at atomically counting the bind count and
comparing it to the number of pinned mappings of the object. This will
only get more clumsier with asynchronous binding and unbinding.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200401223924.16667-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-02 01:17:39 +01:00
Chris Wilson
0d86ee3509 drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal
If we must revoke the fence because the VMA is no longer present, or
because the fence no longer applies, ensure that we do and convert it
into an error if we try but cannot.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200401210104.15907-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-01 23:34:17 +01:00
Chris Wilson
63baf4f3d5 drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity before unbinding a GGTT fence
Only GPU activity via the GGTT fence is asynchronous, we know that we
control the CPU access directly, so we only need to wait for the GPU to
stop using the fence before we relinquish it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200401210104.15907-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-01 23:34:16 +01:00
Chris Wilson
d002491168 drm/i915: Differentiate between aliasing-ppgtt and ggtt pinning
Userptr causes lockdep to complain when we are using the aliasing-ppgtt
(and ggtt, but for that it is rightfully so to complain about) in that
when we revoke the userptr we take a mutex which we also use to revoke
the mmaps. However, we only revoke mmaps for GGTT bindings and we never
allow userptr to create a GGTT binding so the warning should be false
and is simply caused by our conflation of the aliasing-ppgtt with the
ggtt. So lets try treating the binding into the aliasing-ppgtt as a
separate lockclass from the ggtt. The downside is that we are
deliberately suppressing lockdep;s ability to warn us of cycles.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/478
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326142727.31962-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-27 17:00:51 +00:00
Chris Wilson
92581f9fb9 drm/i915: Immediately execute the fenced work
If the caller allows and we do not have to wait for any signals,
immediately execute the work within the caller's process. By doing so we
avoid the overhead of scheduling a new task, and the latency in
executing it, at the cost of pulling that work back into the immediate
context. (Sometimes we still prefer to offload the task to another cpu,
especially if we plan on executing many such tasks in parallel for this
client.)

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200325120227.8044-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-25 13:05:04 +00:00
Chris Wilson
3447c4c55d drm/i915: Avoid live-lock with i915_vma_parked()
Abuse^W Take advantage that we know we are inside the GT wakeref and
that prevents any client execbuf from reopening the i915_vma in order to
claim all the vma to close without having to drop the spinlock to free
each one individually. By keeping the spinlock, we do not have to
restart if we run concurrently with i915_gem_free_objects -- which
causes them both to restart continually and make very very slow
progress.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1361
Fixes: 77853186e5 ("drm/i915: Claim vma while under closed_lock in i915_vma_parked()")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323092841.22240-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-23 11:16:14 +00:00
Chris Wilson
29e6ecf3ce drm/i915: Extend i915_request_await_active to use all timelines
Extend i915_request_await_active() to be able to asynchronously wait on
all the tracked timelines simultaneously.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200311092044.16353-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-11 10:54:59 +00:00
Chris Wilson
2f0003089b drm/i915: Drop vma is-closed assertion on insert
The is-closed flag may be added after we have acquired the vma under the
ctx->mutex, but will not take effect until after we release the
vm->mutex. i.e. the flag may be set on the vma as attempt to bind it and
that will cause the vma to be unbound later after we unpin it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200303093157.1153887-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-03-03 17:30:20 +00:00
Chris Wilson
00de702c6c drm/i915: Check that the vma hasn't been closed before we insert it
As there is a delay before we pin a vma, there is an opportunity for
another thread to have closed the vm and its vma (including us).
Check as soon as we acquire the vm->mutex and know the vm/vma is stable.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1291
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221121940.2741563-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-21 17:32:27 +00:00
Chris Wilson
30ca04e16c drm/i915: Hold reference to previous active fence as we queue
Take a reference to the previous exclusive fence on the i915_active, as
we wish to add an await to it in the caller (and so must prevent it from
being freed until we have completed that task).

Fixes: e3793468b4 ("drm/i915: Use the async worker to avoid reclaim tainting the ggtt->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200203094152.4150550-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-03 11:25:39 +00:00
Chris Wilson
e3793468b4 drm/i915: Use the async worker to avoid reclaim tainting the ggtt->mutex
On Braswell and Broxton (also known as Valleyview and Apollolake), we
need to serialise updates of the GGTT using the big stop_machine()
hammer. This has the side effect of appearing to lockdep as a possible
reclaim (since it uses the cpuhp mutex and that is tainted by per-cpu
allocations). However, we want to use vm->mutex (including ggtt->mutex)
from within the shrinker and so must avoid such possible taints. For this
purpose, we introduced the asynchronous vma binding and we can apply it
to the PIN_GLOBAL so long as take care to add the necessary waits for
the worker afterwards.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/211
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130181710.2030251-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-30 21:35:43 +00:00
Chris Wilson
d62f416f92 drm/i915: Wait on vma activity before taking the mutex
Optimistically wait for the prior vma activity before taking the mutex
to minimise the mutex hold time while unbinding. We will then verify the
vma is idle with a second wait under the mutex to ensure it is safe to
unbind.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123224459.38128-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-24 10:37:13 +00:00
Chris Wilson
60e94557ff drm/i915: Check activity on i915_vma after confirming pin_count==0
Only assert that the i915_vma is now idle if and only if no other pins
are present. If another user has the i915_vma pinned, they may submit
more work to the i915_vma skipping the vm->mutex used to serialise the
unbind. We need to wait again, if we want to continue and unbind this
vma.

However, if we own the i915_vma (we hold the vm->mutex for the unbind
and the pin_count is 0), we can assert that the vma remains idle as we
unbind.

Fixes: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/530
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123224459.38128-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-24 10:37:13 +00:00
Chris Wilson
5424f5d794 drm/i915: Clear the GGTT_WRITE bit on unbinding the vma
While we do flush writes to the vma before unbinding (to make sure they
go through the right detiling register), we may also be concurrently
poking at the GGTT_WRITE bit from set-domain, as we mark all GGTT vma
associated with an object. We know this is for another vma, as we
are currently unbinding this one -- so if this vma will be reused, it
will be refaulted and have its dirty bit set before the next write.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/999
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200121222447.419489-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-22 13:21:16 +00:00
Chris Wilson
c0e60347d4 drm/i915/gt: Hold rpm wakeref before taking ggtt->vm.mutex
We need to hold the runtime-pm wakeref to update the global PTEs (as
they exist behind a PCI BAR). However, some systems invoke ACPI during
runtime resume and so require allocations, which is verboten inside the
vm->mutex. Ergo, we must not use intel_runtime_pm_get() inside the
mutex, but lift the call outside.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/958
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110144418.1415639-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-10 20:30:40 +00:00
Chris Wilson
a5972e9315 drm/i915: Reduce warning for i915_vma_pin_iomap() without runtime-pm
Access through the GGTT (iomap) into the vma does require the device to
be awake. However, we often take the i915_vma_pin_iomap() as an early
preparatory step that is long before we use the iomap. Asserting that
the device is awake at pin time does not protect us, and is merely a
nuisance.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200108153550.3803446-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-09 08:53:28 +00:00
Chris Wilson
76f9764cc3 drm/i915: Introduce a vma.kref
Start introducing a kref on i915_vma in order to protect the vma unbind
(i915_gem_object_unbind) from a parallel destruction (i915_vma_parked).
Later, we will use the refcount to manage all access and turn i915_vma
into a first class container.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222210256.2066451-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-23 12:31:54 +00:00
Chris Wilson
e6ba764802 drm/i915: Remove i915->kernel_context
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing
a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate
address space (for our own protection).

Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop
referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random
and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use.

GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context
the execution environment on the GPU.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-21 16:37:10 +00:00
Chris Wilson
da42104f58 drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_frontbuffer as we track activity
Since obj->frontbuffer is no longer protected by the struct_mutex, as we
are processing the execbuf, it may be removed. Mark the
intel_frontbuffer as rcu protected, and so acquire a reference to
the struct as we track activity upon it.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/827
Fixes: 8e7cb1799b ("drm/i915: Extract intel_frontbuffer active tracking")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191218104043.3539458-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-18 12:09:57 +00:00
Chris Wilson
54d7195f8c drm/i915: Unpin vma->obj on early error
If we inherit an error along the fence chain, we skip the main work
callback and go straight to the error. In the case of the vma bind
worker, we only dropped the pinned pages from the worker.

In the process, make sure we call the release earlier rather than wait
until the final reference to the fence is dropped (as a reference is
kept while being listened upon).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216161717.2688274-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-18 10:13:03 +00:00
Chris Wilson
d3e483526c drm/i915: Change i915_vma_unbind() to report -EAGAIN on activity
If someone else acquires the i915_vma before we complete our wait and
unbind it, we currently error out with -EBUSY. Use -EAGAIN instead so
that if necessary the caller is prepared to try again.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/683
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191208161252.3015727-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-09 11:49:57 +00:00
Chris Wilson
77853186e5 drm/i915: Claim vma while under closed_lock in i915_vma_parked()
Remove the vma we wish to destroy from the gt->closed_list to avoid
having two i915_vma_parked() try and free it.

Fixes: aa5e4453dc ("drm/i915/gem: Try to flush pending unbind events")
References: 2850748ef8 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205214159.829727-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-06 11:16:49 +00:00
Chris Wilson
ccd2094559 drm/i915: Try hard to bind the context
It is not acceptable for context pinning to fail with -ENOSPC as we
should always be able to make space in the GGTT. The only reason we may
fail is that other "temporary" context pins are reserving their space
and we need to wait for an available slot.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/676
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205113726.413351-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-05 13:50:54 +00:00
Abdiel Janulgue
cc662126b4 drm/i915: Introduce DRM_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET
This is really just an alias of mmap_gtt. The 'mmap offset' nomenclature
comes from the value returned by this ioctl which is the offset into the
device fd which userpace uses with mmap(2).

mmap_gtt was our initial mmap_offset implementation, this extends
our CPU mmap support to allow additional fault handlers that depends on
the object's backing pages.

Note that we multiplex mmap_gtt and mmap_offset through the same ioctl,
and use the zero extending behaviour of drm to differentiate between
them, when we inspect the flags.

To support multiple mmap types on an object we need to support multiple
mmap_offsets for an object (each offset in the global device address
space corresponding to a unique instance of the object for a file + mmap
type). As we drop the simplified drm core idea of a single mmap_offset,
we need to provide replacement hooks for the dumb mmap interface as
well.

Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/1675
Testcase: igt/gem_mmap_offset
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191204120032.3682839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-04 15:11:44 +00:00
Chris Wilson
dde01d9435 drm/i915: Split detaching and removing the vma
In order to keep the assert_bind_count() valid, we need to hold the vma
page reference until after we drop the bind count. However, we must also
keep the drm_mm_remove_node() as the last action of i915_vma_unbind() so
that it serialises with the unlocked check inside i915_vma_destroy(). So
we need to split up i915_vma_remove() so that we order the detach, drop
pages and remove as required during unbind.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112067
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191030192159.18404-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-31 14:52:19 +00:00
Chris Wilson
71e51ca8dc drm/i915: Lift i915_vma_parked() onto the gt
Currently even though i915_vma_parked() operates on a per-gt struct, it
is called from a global pm notify. This oddity was only because the long
term plan is to decouple the vma cache from the pm notification, but
right now the oddity stands out like a sore thumb!

Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021183236.21790-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-21 21:07:56 +01:00
Chris Wilson
454a325a97 drm/i915: Remove leftover vma->obj->pages_pin_count on insert/remove
We now do the page pin count upfront in vma_get_pages/vma_put_pages, so
that we do the allocations before we enter the vm->mutex. Our vma
page references we are tracked in vma->pages_count and the extra
obj->pages_pin_count being performed later in i915_vma_insert and
i915_vma_remove is redundant, and worse throws off the shrinker's logic
on when it can free an object by unbinding it.

Reported-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reported-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015100155.10376-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-15 11:46:52 +01:00
Chris Wilson
56184a20a8 drm/i915: Drop obj.page_pin_count after a failed vma->set_pages()
Before we attempt to set_pages on the vma, we claim a
obj.pages_pin_count for it. If we subsequently fail to set the pages on
the vma, we need to drop our pinning before returning the error.

Reported-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015093915.3995-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-15 11:46:40 +01:00
Chris Wilson
b1e3177bd1 drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex
Forgo the struct_mutex serialisation for i915_active, and interpose its
own mutex handling for active/retire.

This is a multi-layered sleight-of-hand. First, we had to ensure that no
active/retire callbacks accidentally inverted the mutex ordering rules,
nor assumed that they were themselves serialised by struct_mutex. More
challenging though, is the rule over updating elements of the active
rbtree. Instead of the whole i915_active now being serialised by
struct_mutex, allocations/rotations of the tree are serialised by the
i915_active.mutex and individual nodes are serialised by the caller
using the i915_timeline.mutex (we need to use nested spinlocks to
interact with the dma_fence callback lists).

The pain point here is that instead of a single mutex around execbuf, we
now have to take a mutex for active tracker (one for each vma, context,
etc) and a couple of spinlocks for each fence update. The improvement in
fine grained locking allowing for multiple concurrent clients
(eventually!) should be worth it in typical loads.

v2: Add some comments that barely elucidate anything :(

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 15:39:12 +01:00
Chris Wilson
274cbf20fd drm/i915: Push the i915_active.retire into a worker
As we need to use a mutex to serialise i915_active activation
(because we want to allow the callback to sleep), we need to push the
i915_active.retire into a worker callback in case we get need to retire
from an atomic context.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 15:39:10 +01:00
Chris Wilson
2850748ef8 drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex
Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we
reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes
with the GPU work and with later unbind).

In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to
avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is
the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not
to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma
does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM
fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping
the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by
a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we
do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate
and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv
itself.

Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the
destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex.
A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires
decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new
i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages.
However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm
discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with
trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called!

v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 15:39:02 +01:00
Chris Wilson
5e053450c1 drm/i915: Only track bound elements of the GTT
The premise here is to simply avoiding having to acquire the vm->mutex
inside vma create/destroy to update the vm->unbound_lists, to avoid some
nasty lock recursions later.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 15:39:01 +01:00
Chris Wilson
b290a78b5c drm/i915: Use helpers for drm_mm_node booleans
A subset of 71724f7089 ("drm/mm: Use helpers for drm_mm_node booleans")
in order to prepare drm-intel-next-queued for subsequent patches before
we can backmerge 71724f7089 itself.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004142226.13711-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 15:34:27 +01:00
Chris Wilson
d19d71fc2b drm/i915: Mark i915_request.timeline as a volatile, rcu pointer
The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e.
before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be
unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We
therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the
pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in
a protected context, either during request construction or retirement,
where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It
is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that
need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding
the warnings about dangerous access.

One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is
during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want
to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to
impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed
valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must
be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we
know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the
idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while
submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the
timeline.

v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long
as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of
refactoring (i915_active_add_request)

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-20 10:24:09 +01:00
Chris Wilson
4dd2fbbfb5 drm/i915: Make i915_vma.flags atomic_t for mutex reduction
In preparation for reducing struct_mutex stranglehold around the vm,
make the vma.flags atomic so that we can acquire a pin on the vma
atomically before deciding if we need to take the mutex.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190911090243.16786-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-11 13:39:42 +01:00
Matthew Auld
33dd889923 drm/i915: cleanup cache-coloring
Try to tidy up the cache-coloring such that we rid the code of any
mm.color_adjust assumptions, this should hopefully make it more obvious
in the code when we need to actually use the cache-level as the color,
and as a bonus should make adding a different color-scheme simpler.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190909124052.22900-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-09-09 21:00:20 +01:00
Matthew Auld
1e0a96e508 drm/i915: export color_differs
Export color_differs so that we can use it elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190909124052.22900-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-09-09 21:00:04 +01:00
Chris Wilson
1f7fd484ff drm/i915: Replace i915_vma_put_fence()
Avoid calling i915_vma_put_fence() by using our alternate paths that
bind a secondary vma avoiding the original fenced vma. For the few
instances where we need to release the fence (i.e. on binding when the
GGTT range becomes invalid), replace the put_fence with a revoke_fence.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190822061557.18402-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-22 08:53:42 +01:00