Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Berg
73e686f399 iwlwifi: dvm: remove command/return value from RX handlers
After the previous patches, the command that's passed in nor the
return value are used any more, so can be removed.

While at it, make some functions static.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
2015-08-04 10:11:41 +03:00
Emmanuel Grumbach
a102292719 iwlwifi: remove CMD_SYNC
CMD_SYNC is really 0 which is confusing:

if (cmd.flags & CMD_SYNC) is always false.
Fix this by simply removing its definition.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
2014-05-13 13:52:19 +03:00
Emmanuel Grumbach
51368bf792 iwlwifi: Update Copyright to 2014
Happy new year!

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
2013-12-31 19:03:53 +02:00
Luis R. Rodriguez
8fe02e167e cfg80211: consolidate passive-scan and no-ibss flags
These two flags are used for the same purpose, just
combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating
radiation is allowed.

Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as
the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we
also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags.
Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels.

Update all places in the tree using these flags with the
following semantic patch:

@@
@@
-NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
@@
@@
-IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
@@
@@
-NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
@@
@@
-(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR)
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR)
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR

Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to
remove duplicates and to fix some indentation.

Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
[do all the driver updates in one go]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2013-11-25 20:49:35 +01:00
Johannes Berg
da4f87f088 iwlwifi: dvm: remove P2P support
We're not planning to support P2P on older devices, so
remove the Kconfig option and associated code for it.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2013-07-25 15:02:59 +02:00
Johannes Berg
0d8877a10d iwlwifi: move some configuration parameters into DVM
There are a number of parameters that aren't really hardware
specific but rather define how the DVM firmware is used.
Move these into the DVM configuration.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2013-05-27 13:11:42 +02:00
Emmanuel Grumbach
410dc5aa59 iwlwifi: a few fixes in license
7000.c was released as GPL only by mistake: it should be
dual licensed - GPL / BSD.
The file that contains the license in the kernel is COPYING
and not LICENSE.GPL.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2013-03-06 16:46:59 +01:00
Johannes Berg
128e63ef07 iwlwifi: update copyright
Update Copyright notices to 2013.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2013-01-24 13:00:55 +01:00
Tim Gardner
8907a6fb62 iwlwifi: iwlagn_request_scan: Fix check for priv->scan_request
The WARN_ON_ONCE() check for scan_request will not correctly detect
a NULL pointer for scan_type == IWL_SCAN_NORMAL. Make it explicit
that the check only applies to normal scans.

Convert WARN_ON_ONCE to WARN_ON since priv->scan_request really _can't_
be NULL for normal scans. If it is then we should emit frequent warnings.

This smatch warning led to scrutiny of iwlagn_request_scan():

drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/scan.c:894 iwlagn_request_scan() error: we previously assumed 'priv->scan_request' could be null (see line 792)

Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-12-10 22:38:58 +01:00
Eytan Lifshitz
b7998c8b44 iwlwifi: Change define and struct names in iwl-eeprom-parse.h
Since we will have several forms of NVM (EEPROM, OTP, etc.)
and they will have different layouts, make the parsed data
more generic. This allows functional code to be independent
of a specific layout.

Also change some variables and function names from having
"eeprom" to "nvm" in their name.

Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-12-06 22:21:38 +01:00
Johannes Berg
ca42613a55 iwlwifi: use eth_broadcast_addr
Instead of memcpy() from a static array, just use
the new helper function eth_broadcast_addr().

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-09-19 12:11:45 +02:00
Johannes Berg
b3a6d2e0e7 iwlwifi: limit dwell time more strictly
The dwell time for scanning is currently limited
so that it fits into the timings inside the ucode
when that is tracking DTIM/beacon periods for the
AP(s) it's connected to.

However, when it's connected to two APs, those
may be in lockstep, for example if they both have
a DTIM interval of 100 TU, then one could be 50
TU after the other, leaving only 50 TU free to
be used by scanning.

Since we can't know how far apart they are the
only option is to restrict to 1/2 of the minium
of the two APs.

In theory, it would be possible to not use 1/2 of
the minimum but take into account that if they
have different intervals then there will be a bit
more time since they can't be in lockstep, but as
they will have 100 TU intervals in practice that
complex calculation will probably just result in
hard-to-find bugs.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-06-25 14:53:43 +02:00
Johannes Berg
3f8a9e7667 iwlwifi: fix radio reset scan dwell vs. quiet time
My previous commit to shorten the radio reset time
caused issues as the firmware checks the active
dwell time against the quiet time, asserting that
the dwell is >= quiet time. This isn't really
needed in case of passive scanning like here, but
of course we need to pass that check.

To fix this, override the quiet time to be the
same as the radio reset dwell time.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-06-21 10:01:22 +02:00
Johannes Berg
0d4e07726e iwlwifi: use minimal time for radio reset scan
The effect of using a short single-channel scan
to reset the radio is that scanning a channel
that isn't in use needs to re-tune the radio.
This means that the dwell time is irrelevant,
so use a shorter time.

While at it, clean up the code for this a bit.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-06-20 08:41:58 +02:00
Johannes Berg
26a7ca9a71 iwlwifi: refactor EEPROM reading/parsing
The EEPROM reading/parsing code is all mixed in
the driver today, and the EEPROM is parsed only
when we access data from it. This is problematic
because the NVM needs to be parsed and that is
independent of reading it. Also, the NVM format
for new devices will be different and probably
require a new parser.

Therefore refactor the reading and parsing and
create two independent components. Reading the
EEPROM requires direct hardware accesses and
therefore access to the transport, but parsing
is independent and can be done on an NVM blob.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-06-06 13:24:19 +02:00
Johannes Berg
1023fdc485 iwlwifi: move DVM code into subdirectory
Since we're working on another mode/driver
inside iwlwifi, move the current one into a
subdirectory to more cleanly separate the
code. While at it, rename all the files.

Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
2012-06-06 13:21:14 +02:00