There is no need to assign ret variable in ->probe().
Drop useless assignment.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
When we count from 0 it's possible to get into off-by-one error.
That's what had happened to this driver. So, correct amount of pins
and related typos in the code.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The Intel Lynxpoint pinctrl driver implements irqchip callbacks which are
called with desc->lock raw_spinlock held. In mainline this is fine because
spinlock resolves to raw_spinlock. However, running the same code in -rt
we will get a BUG() asserted.
This is because in -rt spinlocks are preemptible so taking the driver
private spinlock in irqchip callbacks causes might_sleep() to trigger.
In order to keep -rt happy but at the same time make sure that register
accesses get serialized, convert the driver to use raw_spinlock instead.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Move Lynxpoint GPIO driver under Intel pin control umbrella
for further transformation to a real pin control driver.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
