Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitry Baryshkov
323ec001c6 x86: use generic per-device dma coherent allocator
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-30 12:51:07 +02:00
Miquel van Smoorenburg
b7f09ae583 x86, pci-dma.c: don't always add __GFP_NORETRY to gfp
Currently arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c always adds __GFP_NORETRY
to the allocation flags, because it wants to be reasonably
sure not to deadlock when calling alloc_pages().

But really that should only be done in two cases:
- when allocating memory in the lower 16 MB DMA zone.
  If there's no free memory there, waiting or OOM killing is of no use
- when optimistically trying an allocation in the DMA32 zone
  when dma_mask < DMA_32BIT_MASK hoping that the allocation
  happens to fall within the limits of the dma_mask

Also blindly adding __GFP_NORETRY to the the gfp variable might
not be a good idea since we then also use it when calling
dma_ops->alloc_coherent(). Clearing it might also not be a
good idea, dma_alloc_coherent()'s caller might have set it
on purpose. The gfp variable should not be clobbered.

[ mingo@elte.hu: converted to delta patch ontop of previous version. ]

Signed-off-by: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-10 12:22:18 +02:00
Miquel van Smoorenburg
db9f600b96 x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 04:47 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So...  why not just remove the setting of __GFP_NORETRY?  Why is it
> > wrong to oom-kill things in this case?
>
> When the 16MB zone overflows (which can be common in some workloads)
> calling the OOM killer is pretty useless because it has barely any
> real user data [only exception would be the "only 16MB" case Alan
> mentioned]. Killing random processes in this case is bad.
>
> I think for 16MB __GFP_NORETRY is ok because there should be
> nothing freeable in there so looping is useless. Only exception would be the
> "only 16MB total" case again but I'm not sure 2.6 supports that at all
> on x86.
>
> On the other hand d_a_c() does more allocations than just 16MB, especially
> on 64bit and the other zones need different strategies.

Okay, so how about this then ?

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-02 12:14:58 +02:00
Takashi Iwai
4a367f3a9d x86/PCI: fix broken ISA DMA
Rene Herman reported:

> commit 8779f2fc3b
>
> "x86: don't try to allocate from DMA zone at first"
>
> breaks all of ISA DMA. Or all of ALSA ISA DMA at least. All
> ISA soundcards are silent following that commit -- no error
> messages, everything appears fine, just silence.

That patch is buggy. We had an implicit assumption that
dev = NULL for ISA devices that require 24bit DMA.

The recent work on x86 dma_alloc_coherent() breaks the ISA DMA buffer
allocation, which is represented by "dev = NULL" and requires 24bit
DMA implicitly.

Bisected-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-05-13 09:51:53 -07:00
Dmitri Vorobiev
b4cdc4300d x86: iommu_sac_force can become static
The iommu_sac_force variable is needlessly defined global,
and this patch makes it static. Additionally, this variable
needs not be explicitly initialized.

Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-30 23:15:34 +02:00
Glauber Costa
098cb7f27e x86: integrate pci-dma.c
The code in pci-dma_{32,64}.c are now sufficiently
close to each other. We merge them in pci-dma.c.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:58 +02:00
Glauber Costa
cac67877d2 x86: move bad_dma_address
It goes to pci-dma.c, and is removed from the arch-specific files.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:58 +02:00
Glauber Costa
8e8edc6401 x86: move dma_coherent functions to pci-dma.c
They are placed in an ifdef, since they are i386 specific
the structure definition goes to dma-mapping.h.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
fae9a0d8ca x86: merge iommu initialization parameters
we merge the iommu initialization parameters in pci-dma.c
Nice thing, that both architectures at least recognize the same
parameters.

usedac i386 parameter is marked for deprecation

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
8e0c379718 x86: merge dma_supported
The code for both arches are very similar, so this patch merge them.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
bca5c09663 x86: move pci fixup to pci-dma.c
via_no_dac provides a fixup that is the same for both
architectures. Move it to pci-dma.c.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
116890d556 x86: move x86_64-specific to common code.
This patch moves the bootmem functions, that are largely
x86_64-specific into pci-dma.c. The code goes inside an ifdef.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
cb5867a5d8 x86: move initialization functions to pci-dma.c
initcalls that triggers the various possibiities for
dma subsys are moved to pci-dma.c.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
f9c258de34 x86: unify pci-nommu
merge pci-base_32.c and pci-nommu_64.c into pci-nommu.c
Their code were made the same, so now they can be merged.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
85c246ee16 x86: move definition to pci-dma.c
Move dma_ops structure definition to pci-dma.c, where it
belongs.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00
Glauber Costa
459121c9ec x86: introduce pci-dma.c
This patch introduces pci-dma.c, a common file for pci dma
between i386 and x86_64. As a start, dma_set_mask() is the same
between architectures, and is placed there.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:57 +02:00