Prepare to allow the execlists submission to be run from underneath a
hardirq timer context (and not just the current softirq context) as is
required for fast preemption resets and context switches.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180508210318.10274-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add some onion to populate_lr_context.
v2: prefer err_unpin_ctx
drop the fixes tag, worst case we just spew a warn before everything
is cleaned up and balance is restored
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180301114639.510-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
When rescheduling a change of dependencies, they all need to be added to
the same priolist (at least the ones on the same engine!). Since we
likely want to move a batch of requests, keep the priolist around.
v2: Throw in an assert to catch trivial errors quickly.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180508003046.2633-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
lookup_priolist() no longer attaches the request into the priolist, it
just returns the priolist for the given priority instead. Drop the
unused parameter.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180508003046.2633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Limit the arbitration (where preemption may occur) to inside the batch,
and prevent it from happening on the pipecontrols/flushes we use to
write the breadcrumb seqno. Once the user batch is complete, we have
nothing left to do but serialise and emit the breadcrumb; switching
contexts at this point is futile so don't.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195416.22498-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Move the tracepoint into the common execlists_context_schedule_out() and
call it from preemption completion as well. A small bit of refactoring
code should help with when tracing, or else we end up with requests
mysteriously disappearing and some being emitted to HW multiple times.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502230202.6848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We need to move to a more flexible timeline that doesn't assume one
fence context per engine, and so allow for a single timeline to be used
across a combination of engines. This means that preallocating a fence
context per engine is now a hindrance, and so we want to introduce the
singular timeline. From the code perspective, this has the notable
advantage of clearing up a lot of mirky semantics and some clumsy
pointer chasing.
By splitting the timeline up into a single entity rather than an array
of per-engine timelines, we can realise the goal of the previous patch
of tracking the timeline alongside the ring.
v2: Tweak wait_for_idle to stop the compiling thinking that ret may be
uninitialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In the future, we want to move a request between engines. To achieve
this, we first realise that we have two timelines in effect here. The
first runs through the GTT is required for ordering vma access, which is
tracked currently by engine. The second is implied by sequential
execution of commands inside the ringbuffer. This timeline is one that
maps to userspace's expectations when submitting requests (i.e. given the
same context, batch A is executed before batch B). As the rings's
timelines map to userspace and the GTT timeline an implementation
detail, move the timeline from the GTT into the ring itself (per-context
in logical-ring-contexts/execlists, or a global per-engine timeline for
the shared ringbuffers in legacy submission.
The two timelines are still assumed to be equivalent at the moment (no
migrating requests between engines yet) and so we can simply move from
one to the other without adding extra ordering.
v2: Reinforce that one isn't allowed to mix the engine execution
timeline with the client timeline from userspace (on the ring).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Due to the latency of the tasklet running from ksoftirqd, by the time we
process the execlist dequeue may be a long time behind the GPU. If the
request was completed when we ran reschedule, we will not have tweaked
its priority, but if it is still listed as being in-flight for dequeue
we will use it as a reference for the rest of the queue, including
requests from its own context which will now be at higher priority. This
can cause us to issue a preempt-to-idle request, even though the request
we want to preempt is already complete.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180501122131.19435-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Make life easier in upcoming patches by moving the context_pin and
context_unpin vfuncs into inline helpers.
v2: Fixup mock_engine to mark the context as pinned on use.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180430131503.5375-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Previously, we just reset the ring register in the context image such
that we could skip over the broken batch and emit the closing
breadcrumb. However, on resume the context image and GPU state would be
reloaded, which may have been left in an inconsistent state by the
reset. The presumption was that at worst it would just cause another
reset and skip again until it recovered, however it seems just as likely
to cause an unrecoverable hang. Instead of risking loading an incomplete
context image, restore it back to the default state.
v2: Fix up off-by-one from including the ppHSWP in with the register
state.
v3: Use a ring local to compact a few lines.
v4: Beware setting the ring local before checking for a NULL request.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105304
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> #v2
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180428111532.15819-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Interrupt handling in Gen11 is quite different from previous platforms.
v2: Rebased (Michel)
v3: Rebased with wiggle
v4: Rebased, remove TODO warning correctly (Daniele)
v5: Rebased, made gen11_gtiir const while at it (Michel)
v6: Rebased
v7: Adapt to the style currently in upstream
Suggested-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1524605995-22324-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but
in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects
of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the
frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for
scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience.
v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and
ye olde gcc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Having moved the priotree struct into i915_scheduler.h, identify it as
the scheduling element and rebrand into i915_sched. This becomes more
useful as we start attaching more information we require to propagate
through the scheduler.
v2: Use i915_sched_node for future distinctiveness
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add a selftest to ensure that we restore the whitelisted registers after
rewrite the registers everytime they might be scrubbed, e.g. module
load, reset and resume. For the other volatile workaround registers, we
export their presence via debugfs and check in igt/gem_workarounds.
However, we don't export the whitelist and rather than do so, let's test
them directly in the kernel.
The test we use is to read the registers back from the CS (this helps us
be sure that the registers will be valid for MI_LRI etc). In order to
generate the expected list, we split intel_whitelist_workarounds_emit
into two phases, the first to build the list and the second to apply.
Inside the test, we only build the list and then check that list against
the hw.
v2: Filter out pre-gen8 as they do not have RING_NONPRIV.
v3: Drop unused engine parameter, no plans to use it now or future.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180414122754.569-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
There are different kind of workarounds (those that modify registers that
live in the context image, those that modify global registers, those that
whitelist registers, etc...) and they have different requirements in terms
of where they are applied and how. Also, by splitting them apart, it should
be easier to decide where a new workaround should go.
v2:
- Add multiple MISSING_CASE
- Rebased
v3:
- Rename mmio_workarounds to gt_workarounds (Chris, Mika)
- Create empty placeholders for BDW and CHV GT WAs
- Rebased
v4: Rebased
v5:
- Rebased
- FORCE_TO_NONPRIV register exists since BDW, so make a path
for it to achieve universality, even if empty (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[ickle: appease checkpatch]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
(incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later.
v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that deals with the hardware (Chris)
v3: Rebased
v4:
- Rebased
- New license header
v5:
- Rebased
- Added some organisational notes to the file (Chris)
v6: Include DOC section in the documentation build (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[ickle: appease checkpatch, mostly]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
We can refine our current execlists->queue_priority if we inspect
ELSP[1] rather than the head of the unsubmitted queue. Currently, we use
the unsubmitted queue and say that if a subsequent request is more
important than the current queue, we will rerun the submission tasklet
to evaluate the need for preemption. However, we only want to preempt if
we need to jump ahead of a currently executing request in ELSP. The
second reason for running the submission tasklet is amalgamate requests
into the active context on ELSP[0] to avoid a stall when ELSP[0] drains.
(Though repeatedly amalgamating requests into the active context and
triggering many lite-restore is off question gain, the goal really is to
put a context into ELSP[1] to cover the interrupt.) So if instead of
looking at the head of the queue, we look at the context in ELSP[1] we
can answer both of the questions more accurately -- we don't need to
rerun the submission tasklet unless our new request is important enough
to feed into, at least, ELSP[1].
v2: Add some comments from the discussion with Tvrtko.
v3: More commentary to cross-reference queue_request()
References: f6322eddaf ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180411103929.27374-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Include fence context and seqno in low level tracing so it is easier to
follow flows of individual requests when things go bad.
Also added tracing on the reset side of things.
v2:
Chris Wilson:
* Standardize global_seqno and seqno as global.
* Include current hws seqno in execlists_cancel_port_requests.
v3:
* Fix port printk format for all builds.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v2
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406123514.5809-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Before adding a new feature to execlists submission, we should endeavour
to cover the baseline behaviour with selftests. So start the ball
rolling.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180404093329.5383-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a
successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had
assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue
(preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may
be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have
completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set
even though the system is now idle.
We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests()
as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared.
Fixes: f6322eddaf ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit eed7ec52f2)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Let's avoid having to delve down the pointer chain to see if the i915
device has support for preemption and store that on the engine, which
made the decision in the first place!
v2: Refactor common preemption policy between execlists/guc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180403183537.5522-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We would like to start doing some bookkeeping at the beginning, between
contexts and at the end of execlists submission. We already mark the
beginning and end using EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER, to provide an indication
when the HW is idle. This give us a pair of sequence points we can then
expand on for further bookkeeping.
v2: Refactor guc submission to share the same begin/end.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180331130626.10712-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tvrtko uncovered a fun issue with recovering from a wedge device. In his
tests, he wedged the driver by injecting an unrecoverable hang whilst a
batch was spinning. As we reset the gpu in the middle of the spinner,
when resumed it would continue on from the next instruction in the ring
and write it's breadcrumb. However, on wedging we updated our
bookkeeping to indicate that the GPU had completed executing and would
restart from after the breadcrumb; so the emission of the stale
breadcrumb from before the reset came as a bit of a surprise.
A simple fix is to when rebinding the context into the GPU, we update
the ring register state in the context image to match our bookkeeping.
We already have to update the RING_START and RING_TAIL, so updating
RING_HEAD as well is trivial. This works because whenever we unbind the
context, we keep the bookkeeping in check; and on wedging we unbind all
contexts.
Testcase: igt/gem_eio
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180327210136.16750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
If the request is still waiting on external fences, it has not yet been
submitted to the HW queue and so we can forgo kicking the submission
tasklet when re-evaluating its priority.
This should have no impact other than reducing the number of tasklet
wakeups under signal heavy workloads (e.g. switching between engines).
v2: Use prebaked container_of()
References: f6322eddaf ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180326115044.2505-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a
successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had
assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue
(preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may
be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have
completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set
even though the system is now idle.
We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests()
as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared.
Fixes: f6322eddaf ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We were relying on the uncached reads when processing the CSB to provide
ourselves with the serialisation with the interrupt handler (so we could
detect new interrupts in the middle of processing the old one). However,
in commit 767a983ab2 ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD
from the HWSP") those uncached reads were eliminated (on one path at
least) and along with them our serialisation. The result is that we
would very rarely miss notification of a new interrupt and leave a
context-switch unprocessed, hanging the GPU.
Fixes: 767a983ab2 ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD from the HWSP")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180321091027.21034-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 9153e6b7c8)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Commit 0f36a85c3b ("drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a GPU
reset") got confused and only applied the flush to the set-wedge path
(which itself is proving troublesome), but we also need the
serialisation on the regular reset path. Oops.
Move the interrupt into reset_irq() and make it common to the reset and
final set-wedge.
v2: reset_irq() after port cancellation, as we assert that
execlists->active is sane for cancellation (and is being reset by
reset_irq).
References: 0f36a85c3b ("drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a GPU reset")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180323101824.14645-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
After resetting the GPU (or subset of engines), call synchronize_irq()
to flush any pending irq before proceeding with the cleanup. For a
device level reset, we disable the interupts around the reset, but when
resetting just one engine, we have to avoid such global disabling. This
leaves us open to an interrupt arriving for the engine as we try to
reset it. We already do try to flush the IIR following the reset, but we
have to ensure that the in-flight interrupt does not land after we start
cleaning up after the reset; enter synchronize_irq().
As it current stands, we very rarely, but fatally, see sequences such as:
2.... 57964564us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0
2.... 57964613us : execlists_reset: rcs0 seqno=424
0d.h1 57964615us : gen8_cs_irq_handler: rcs0 CS active=1
2d..1 57964617us : __i915_request_unsubmit: rcs0 fence 29:1056 <- global_seqno 1060
2.... 57964703us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0
0..s. 57964705us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=0, irq-posted?=1
v2: Move the sync into the execlists reset handler so that we coordinate
the flush with disabling the interrupt handling and canceling the
pending interrupt.
v3: Just use synchronize_hardirq() to avoid the might_sleep(), we do not
yet have threaded-irq to worry about.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322073533.5313-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
We were relying on the uncached reads when processing the CSB to provide
ourselves with the serialisation with the interrupt handler (so we could
detect new interrupts in the middle of processing the old one). However,
in commit 767a983ab2 ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD
from the HWSP") those uncached reads were eliminated (on one path at
least) and along with them our serialisation. The result is that we
would very rarely miss notification of a new interrupt and leave a
context-switch unprocessed, hanging the GPU.
Fixes: 767a983ab2 ("drm/i915/execlists: Read the context-status HEAD from the HWSP")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180321091027.21034-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The only usage outside the intel_lrc.c file is in the ringbuffer
init, but the irq mask calculated there is then overwritten for
all engines that have a non-zero shift, so we can drop it.
This change is not aimed at code saving but at removing from
intel_engines information that does not apply to all gens that have
the engine. When checking without the temporary WARN_ON, code size
is basically unchanged.
v2: make the irq_shifts array static const
v3: rebase, move irq_shifts array to logical_ring_default_irqs
v4: move array inside the if and use u8 for it (Chris)
Suggested-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180314182653.26981-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The "reset" value and the "keep" value are the same.
While we are here, add a TODO for gen11 interrupt reset
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180314182653.26981-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
There is one corner case missing schedule out notification of the preempted
request. The preempted request is just completed when preemption happen,
then it will be canceled and won't be resubmitted later, GVT-g will lost
the schedule out notification.
Here add schedule out notification if found the preempted request has been
completed.
v2:
- refine description, add completed check and notification in
execlists_cancel_port_requests. (Chris)
v3:
- use ternary confitional, remove local variable. (Tvrtko)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Weinan Li <weinan.z.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520302557-25079-1-git-send-email-weinan.z.li@intel.com
Up to now, subslice mask was assumed to be uniform across slices. But
starting with Cannonlake, slices can be asymmetric (for example slice0
has different number of subslices as slice1+). This change stores all
subslices masks for all slices rather than having a single mask that
applies to all slices.
v2: Rework how we store total numbers in sseu_dev_info (Tvrtko)
Fix CHV eu masks, was reading disabled as enabled (Tvrtko)
Readability changes (Tvrtko)
Add EU index helper (Tvrtko)
v3: Turn ALIGN(v, 8) / 8 into DIV_ROUND_UP(v, BITS_PER_BYTE) (Tvrtko)
Reuse sseu_eu_idx() for setting eu_mask on CHV (Tvrtko)
Reformat debug prints for subslices (Tvrtko)
v4: Change eu_mask helper into sseu_set_eus() (Tvrtko)
v5: With Haswell reporting masks & counts, bump sseu_*_eus() functions
to use u16 (Lionel)
v6: Fix sseu_get_eus() for > 8 EUs per subslice (Lionel)
v7: Change debugfs enabels for number of subslices per slice, will
need a small igt/pm_sseu change (Lionel)
Drop subslice_total field from sseu_dev_info, rely on
sseu_subslice_total() to recompute the value instead (Lionel)
v8: Remove unused function compute_subslice_total() (Lionel)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306122857.27317-2-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com
Enhanced Execlists is an upgraded version of execlists which supports
up to 8 ports. The lrcs to be submitted are written to a submit queue
(the ExecLists Submission Queue - ELSQ), which is then loaded on the
HW. When writing to the ELSP register, the lrcs are written cyclically
in the queue from position 0 to position 7. Alternatively, it is
possible to write directly in the individual positions of the queue
using the ELSQC registers. To be able to re-use all the existing code
we're using the latter method and we're currently limiting ourself to
only using 2 elements.
v2: Rebase.
v3: Switch from !IS_GEN11 to GEN < 11 (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio).
v4: Use the elsq registers instead of elsp. (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio)
v5: Reword commit, rename regs to be closer to specs, turn off
preemption (Daniele), reuse engine->execlists.elsp (Chris)
v6: use has_logical_ring_elsq to differentiate the new paths
v7: add preemption support, rename els to submit_reg (Chris)
v8: save the ctrl register inside the execlists struct, drop CSB
handling updates (superseded by preempt_complete_status) (Chris)
v9: s/drm_i915_gem_request/i915_request (Mika)
v10: resolved conflict in inject_preempt_context (Mika)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-4-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Starting from Gen11 the context descriptor format has been updated in
the HW. The hw_id field has been considerably reduced in size and engine
class and instance fields have been added.
There is a slight name clashing issue because the field that we call
hw_id is actually called SW Context ID in the specs for Gen11+.
With the current size of the hw_id field we can have a maximum of 2k
contexts at any time, but we could use the sw_counter field (which is sw
defined) to increase that because the HW requirement is that
engine_id + sw id + sw_counter is a unique number.
GuC uses a similar method to support more contexts but does its tracking
at lrc level. To avoid doing an implementation that will need to be
reworked once GuC support lands, defer it for now and mark it as TODO.
v2: rebased, add documentation, fix GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT
v3: rebased, bring back lost code from i915_gem_context.c
v4: make TODO comment more generic
v5: be consistent with bit ordering, add extra checks (Chris)
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-3-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
On Gen11 interrupt masks need to be clear to allow C6 entry.
We keep them all enabled knowing that we generate extra
interrupts.
v2: Rebase.
v3: Remove gen 11 extra check in logical_render_ring_init.
v4: Rebase fixes.
v5: Rebase/refactor.
v6: Rebase.
v7: Rebase.
v8: Update comment and commit message (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
During reset/wedging, we have to clean up the requests on the timeline
and flush the pending interrupt state. Currently, we are abusing the irq
disabling of the timeline spinlock to protect the irq state in
conjunction to the engine's timeline requests, but this is accidental
and conflates the spinlock with the irq state. A baffling state of
affairs for the reader.
Instead, explicitly disable irqs over the critical section, and separate
modifying the irq state from the timeline's requests.
Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302143246.2579-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Although this state (execlists->active and engine->irq_posted) itself is
not protected by the engine->timeline spinlock, it does conveniently
ensure that irqs are disabled. We can use this to protect our
manipulation of the state and so ensure that the next IRQ to arrive sees
consistent state and (hopefully) ignores the reset engine.
Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302131246.22036-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Sometimes we need to boost the priority of an in-flight request, which
may lead to the situation where the second submission port then contains
a higher priority context than the first and so we need to inject a
preemption event. To do so we must always check inside
execlists_dequeue() whether there is a priority inversion between the
ports themselves as well as the head of the priority sorted queue, and we
cannot just skip dequeuing if the queue is empty.
As Michał noted, this doesn't simply extend to handling more than 2-port
submission, as we may need to reorder within the array of executing
requests which themselves are lower priority than the first. A task for
later!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222142229.14517-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Print out the current request/context before doing the GEM_BUG_ON, so
that we can inspect the values in the ftrace.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221152301.9178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Load an empty ringbuffer for preemption, ignoring the lite-restore
workaround as we know the preempt context is always idle before preemption.
Note that after some digging by Michal Winiarski, we found that
RING_HEAD is no longer being updated (due to inhibiting context save
restore) so this patch is already in effect!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221133236.29402-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency,
execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from
drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM
user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for
tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since
they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.)
In short, the spatch:
@@
@@
- struct drm_i915_gem_request
+ struct i915_request
A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using
'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and
repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members,
'request' is still much preferred for its clarity.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
We can't assert that the execlists are active before we set the flag. So
perform the assert after we are expected to have marked the execlists
active.
Fixes: 339ccd35b4 ("drm/i915: Assert that we always complete a submission to guc/execlists")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180216153210.30551-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The continual resubmission model for execlists (and emulated over guc)
requires that we keep feeding requests into the HW in order to generate
more CS interrupts to drain the rest of the queue. Add a couple of
asserts to ensure that we don't skip a cycle and come to a grinding
halt.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215162553.23348-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
