When replaying a log tree with qgroups enabled, tree_mod_log_rewind does a
sanity-check of the number of items against the maximum possible number.
It calculates that number with the nodesize of fs_root. Unfortunately
fs_root is not yet set at this stage. So instead use the nodesize from
tree_root, which is already initialized.
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Dave Sterba triggered a lockdep complaint about lock ordering
between the sb_internal lock and the cleaner semaphore.
btrfs_lookup_dentry() checks for orphans if we're looking up
the inode for a subvolume, and subvolume creation is triggering
the lookup with a transaction running.
This commit moves the d_instantiate after the transaction closes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When btrfs_qgroup_reserve returned a failure, we were missing a counter
operation for BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++, leading to warning
messages about outstanding extents and space_info->bytes_may_use != 0.
Additionally, the error handling code didn't take into account that we
dropped the inode lock which might require more cleanup.
Luckily, all the cleanup code we need is already there and can be shared
with reserve_metadata_bytes, which is exactly what this patch does.
Reported-by: Lev Vainblat <lev@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We specifically do not update the disk i_size if there are ordered extents
outstanding for any area between the current disk_i_size and our ordered
extent so that we do not expose stale data. The problem is the check we
have only checks if the ordered extent starts at or after the current
disk_i_size, which doesn't take into account an ordered extent that starts
before the current disk_i_size and ends past the disk_i_size. Fix this by
checking if the extent ends past the disk_i_size. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
If we have an ordered extent before the ordered extent we are currently
completing that is after the current disk_i_size we will put our i_size
update into that ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data. The
problem is that if our disk i_size is updated past the previous ordered
extent we won't update the i_size with the pending i_size update. So check
the pending i_size update and if its above the current disk i_size we need
to go ahead and try to update. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
While running snapshot testscript created by Mitch and David,
the race between autodefrag and snapshot deletion can lead to
corruption of dead_root list so that we can get crash on
btrfs_clean_old_snapshots().
And besides autodefrag, scrub also does the same thing, ie. read
root first and get inode.
Here is the story(take autodefrag as an example):
(1) when we delete a snapshot or subvolume, it will set its root's
refs to zero and do a iput() on its own inode, and if this inode happens
to be the only active in-meory one in root's inode rbtree, it will add
itself to the global dead_roots list for later cleanup.
(2) after (1), the autodefrag thread may read another inode for defrag
and the inode is just in the deleted snapshot/subvolume, but all of these
are without checking if the root is still valid(refs > 0). So the end up
result is adding the deleted snapshot/subvolume's root to the global
dead_roots list AGAIN.
Fortunately, we already have a srcu lock to avoid the race, ie. subvol_srcu.
So all we need to do is to take the lock to protect 'read root and get inode',
since we synchronize to wait for the rcu grace period before adding something
to the global dead_roots list.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
When we fail to start a transaction, we need to release the reserved free space
and qgroup space, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
If the checks at the beginning of btrfs_file_aio_write() fail, we needn't
decrease ->sync_writers, because we have not increased it. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out
the existing extents you will have removed the extent map from the em tree,
but it's still valid for the current fsync so we go ahead and write it. The
problem is we unconditionally try to merge it back into the em tree, but if
we've removed it from the em tree that will cause use after free problems.
Fix this to only merge if we are still a part of the tree. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
If we remove a missing device, bdev is null, and if we
send that off to btrfs_kobject_uevent we'll panic.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes() locks the delalloc_inodes list, fetches the
first inode, unlocks the list, triggers btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work/
btrfs_queue_worker for this inode, and then it locks the list, checks the
head of the list again. But because we don't delete the first inode that it
deals with before, it will fetch the same inode. As a result, this function
allocates a huge amount of btrfs_delalloc_work structures, and OOM happens.
Fix this problem by splice this delalloc list.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The max device number of single profile is 1, not 0 (0 means 'as many as
possible'). Fix it.
Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
First, though the current transaction->aborted check can stop the commit early
and avoid unnecessary operations, it is too early, and some transaction handles
don't end, those handles may set transaction->aborted after the check.
Second, when we commit the transaction, we will wake up some worker threads to
flush the space cache and inode cache. Those threads also allocate some transaction
handles and may set transaction->aborted if some serious error happens.
So we need more check for ->aborted when committing the transaction. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We may access and update transaction->aborted on the different CPUs without
lock, so we need ACCESS_ONCE() wrapper to prevent the compiler from creating
unsolicited accesses and make sure we can get the right value.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
I noticed a WARN_ON going off when adding csums because we were going over
the amount of csum bytes that should have been allowed for an ordered
extent. This is a leftover from when we used to hold the csums privately
for direct io, but now we use the normal ordered sum stuff so we need to
make sure and check if we've moved on to another extent so that the csums
are added to the right extent. Without this we could end up with csums for
bytenrs that don't have extents to cover them yet. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
For compressed extents, the range of checksum is covered by disk length,
and the disk length is different with ram length, so we need to use disk
length instead to get us the right checksum.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
A user reported a BUG_ON(ret) that occured during tree log replay. Ret was
-EAGAIN, so what I think happened is that we removed an extent that covered
a bitmap entry and an extent entry. We remove the part from the bitmap and
return -EAGAIN and then search for the next piece we want to remove, which
happens to be an entire extent entry, so we just free the sucker and return.
The problem is ret is still set to -EAGAIN so we trip the BUG_ON(). The
user used btrfs-zero-log so I'm not 100% sure this is what happened so I've
added a WARN_ON() to catch the other possibility. Thanks,
Reported-by: Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We drop the extent map tree lock while we're logging extents, so somebody
could come in and merge another extent into this one and screw up our
logging, or they could even remove us from the list which would keep us from
logging the extent or freeing our ref on it, so we need to make sure to not
clear LOGGING until after the extent is logged, and then we can merge it to
adjacent extents. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Commit 3fed40cc ("Btrfs: cleanup duplicated division functions"), which
was merged into 3.8-rc1, has introduced a regression by removing logic
that was guarding us against bad user input. Bring it back.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Currently you can just destroy a qgroup even though it is in use by other qgroups
or has qgroups assigned to it. This patch prevents destruction of qgroups unless
they are completely unused. Otherwise destroy will return EBUSY.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If a qgroup that has still assignments is deleted by the user, the corresponding
relations are left in the tree. This leads to an unmountable filesystem.
With this patch, those relations are simple ignored.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Operation-specific check (whether subvol is readonly or not) should go
after the mutual exclusiveness check.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
The error code that is returned in response to starting a mutually
exclusive operation when there is one already running got silently
changed from EINVAL to EINPROGRESS by 5ac00add. Returning EINPROGRESS
to, say, add_dev, when rm_dev is running is misleading. Furthermore,
the operation itself may want to use EINPROGRESS for other purposes.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Balance pause/resume logic got broken by 5ac00add (went in into 3.8-rc1
as part of dev-replace merge). Offending commit took a stab at making
mutually exclusive volume operations (add_dev, rm_dev, resize, balance,
replace_dev) not block behind volume_mutex if another such operation is
in progress and instead return an error right away. Balancing front-end
relied on the blocking behaviour, so the fix is ugly, but short of a
complete rework, it's the best we can do.
Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
truncate() vs. ftruncate() differ in the VFS; truncate()
doesn't set (ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME), and it's up to the
fs to do the timestamp updates if the size changes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
btrfs_cont_expand() tries to free an IS_ERR em as it gets an error from
btrfs_get_extent() and breaks out of its loop.
An instance of -EEXIST was reported in the wild:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874407
I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this
error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors
(ENOMEM, EIO; whatever).
This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR
em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to
use IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
xfstests case 285 complains.
It it because btrfs did not try to find unwritten delalloc
bytes(only dirty pages, not yet writeback) behind prealloc
extents, it ends up finding nothing while we're with SEEK_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We forgot to reset the path lock state to zero after we unlock the path block,
and this can lead to the ASSERT checker in tree unlock API.
Reported-by: Slava Barinov <rayslava@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
This'd avoid us empty looping.
Say we have only one disk and the metadata raid type will be defaultly DUP,
and we do not need to start from index=0(RAID10) and get over two empty
loops to index=2(DUP).
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Running xfstests 83 in a loop would sometimes fail the fsck. This happens
because if we invalidate a page that already has an ordered extent setup for
it we will complete the ordered extent ourselves, assuming that the truncate
will clean everything up. The problem with this is there is plenty of time
for the truncate to fail after we've done this work. So to fix this we need
to add the orphan item first to make sure the cleanup gets done properly,
and then we can truncate the pagecache and all that stuff and be safe. This
fixes the btrfsck failures I was seeing while running 83 in a loop. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We still need to say we're flushing if we're limit flushing to keep somebody
from coming in and stealing our reservation. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We forget to give up the write access after we find some device operation
is going on. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Step to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs <disk>
# mount <disk> <mnt>
# btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv0
# btrfs sub snap <mnt> <mnt>/subv0/snap0
# change <mnt>/subv0 from R/W to R/O
# btrfs sub del <mnt>/subv0/snap0
We deleted the snapshot successfully. I think we should not be able to delete
the snapshot since the parent subvolume is R/O.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
When we're deleting the device we should get it in write mode since
we're going to re-write the super block magic on that device. And it
should fail if the device is read-only.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 6a7a665d78.
This was bug was fixed differently in 3.6, so this commit
isn't needed.
Conflicts:
fs/btrfs/ctree.c
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This reverts commit 95c80bb1f6.
The bug addressed by this commit was fixed differently back in 3.6
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Users report a bug, the reproducer is:
$ mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop0
$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs/
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/dir
$ chattr +C /mnt/btrfs/dir/
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=10;
$ lsattr /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
---------------C- /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
$ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 1 extent found ---> an extent
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=1 seek=5 conv=notrunc,nocreat; sync
$ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 3 extents found ---> with nocow, btrfs breaks the extent into three parts
The new created file should not only inherit the NODATACOW flag, but also
honor NODATASUM flag, because we must do COW on a file extent with checksum.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The handling for directory crc hash overflows was fairly obscure,
split_leaf returns EOVERFLOW when we try to extend the item and that is
supposed to bubble up to userland. For a while it did so, but along the
way we added better handling of errors and forced the FS readonly if we
hit IO errors during the directory insertion.
Along the way, we started testing only for EEXIST and the EOVERFLOW case
was dropped. The end result is that we may force the FS readonly if we
catch a directory hash bucket overflow.
This fixes a few problem spots. First I add tests for EOVERFLOW in the
places where we can safely just return the error up the chain.
btrfs_rename is harder though, because it tries to insert the new
directory item only after it has already unlinked anything the rename
was going to overwrite. Rather than adding very complex logic, I added
a helper to test for the hash overflow case early while it is still safe
to bail out.
Snapshot and subvolume creation had a similar problem, so they are using
the new helper now too.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: Pascal Junod <pascal@junod.info>
This confuses and angers lockdep even though it's ok. We don't really need
the lock for free space inodes since only the transaction committer will be
reserving space. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This happens because writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle does down_read. This
doesn't work for us and it has not been fixed upstream yet, so do it
ourselves and use that instead so we can stop having this stupid long
standing lockup. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When a new file is created with btrfs_create(), the inode will initially be
created with permissions 0666 and later on in btrfs_init_acl() it will be
adapted to mask out the umask bits. The problem is that this change won't make
it into the btrfs_inode unless there's another change to the inode (e.g. writing
content changing the size or touching the file changing the mtime.)
This fix adds a call to btrfs_update_inode() to btrfs_create() to make sure that
the change will not get lost if the in-memory inode is flushed before other
changes are made to the file.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
