The patch removes warnings:
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:146:14: warning: comparison of
unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Compilation warning:
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:148:2: warning:
'temp' is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Warning log:
CHECK arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:522:21: warning: symbol 'wb_msr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:538:21: warning: symbol 'wb_nomsr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:554:21: warning: symbol 'wt_msr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:569:21: warning: symbol 'wt_nomsr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:585:21: warning: symbol 'wt_msr_noirq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:600:21: warning: symbol 'wt_nomsr_noirq' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
CC arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.o
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c: In function '__invalidate_dcache_range_wb':
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:398: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c: In function '__flush_dcache_range_wb':
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:509: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declara
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
1. Remove CACHE_ALL_LOOP2 macro because it is identical to CACHE_ALL_LOOP
2. Change BUG_ON to WARN_ON
3. Remove end aligned from CACHE_LOOP_LIMITS.
C implementation do not need aligned end address and ASM code do aligned
in their macros
4. ASM optimized CACHE_RANGE_LOOP_1/2 macros needs to get aligned end address.
Because end address is compound from start + size, end address is the first address
which is exclude.
Here is the corresponding code which describe it.
+ int align = ~(line_length - 1);
+ end = ((end & align) == end) ? end - line_length : end & align;
a) end is aligned:
it is necessary to subtruct line length because we don't want to work with
next cacheline
b) end address is not aligned:
Just align it to be ready for ASM code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
I create wrong asm code but none test shows that this part of code is wrong.
I am not convinces that were good idea to create asm optimized macros
for caches. The reason is that there is not optimization with previous code
that's why make sense to add old code and do some benchmarking which
functions are faster.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Microblaze version 7.20.d is the first MB version which can be run
on MMU linux. Please do not used previous version because they contain
HW bug.
Based on WB support was necessary to redesign whole cache design.
Microblaze versions from 7.20.a don't need to disable IRQ and cache
before working with them that's why there are special structures for it.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
We used cache_line as cache_line_lenght. For this reason
we did cache flushing 4 times longer than was necessary.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
It is not necessary to check cpuinfo.use_dcache because
this checking is done in function which call that functions
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
