Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Pointer comparison is not sufficient for non-NULL device name matching,
so use strcmp(). Otherwise the semantics remain the same.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
When one regulator supplies another allow the relationship to be specified
using names rather than struct regulators, in a similar manner to that
allowed for consumer supplies. This allows static configuration at compile
time, reducing the need for dynamic init code.
Also change the references to LINE supply to be system supply since line
is sometimes used for actual supplies and therefore potentially confusing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2706 sysfs_add_file_mode+0x4c/0xa8()
Difference between v1 and v2:
Moved sysfs_attr_init() call as first one to access the structure.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Palande <ameya.palande@nokia.com>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
In order to ease transitions with drivers are boards start using regulators
provide an option to cause all regulator_get() calls to succeed, with a
dummy always on regulator being supplied where one has not been configured.
A warning is printed whenever the dummy regulator is used to aid system
development.
This regulator does not implement any regulator operations but will allow
simple consumers which only do enable() and disable() calls to run. It
is kept separate from the fixed voltage regulator to avoid Kconfig
confusion on the part of users when it is extended to allow boards to
explicitly use the dummy regulator to simplify cases where the majority
of supplies are from fixed regulators without software control.
This option is currently only effective for systems which do not specify
full constriants. If required an override could also be provided to allow
these systems to use the dummy regulator, though it is likely that
unconfigured supplies on such systems will lead to error due to
regulators being powered down more aggressively when not in use.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If a regulator driver does not provide a way to query if the driver is
enabled then assume that it is enabled. This is very likely to reflect
the actual state is more useful for callers than reporting an error.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Regulators may sometimes take longer to enable than the control operation
used to do so, either because the regulator has ramp rate control used to
limit inrush current or because the control operation is very fast (GPIO
being the most common example of this). In order to ensure that consumers
do not rely on the regulator before it is enabled provide an enable_time()
operation and have the core delay for that time before returning to the
caller.
This is implemented as a function since the ramp rate may be specified in
voltage per unit time and therefore the time depend on the configuration.
In future it would be desirable to allow the bulk operations to run the
delays for multiple enables in parallel but this is not currently supported.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The intended use case is for drivers which disable regulators to save
power but need to do some work to restore the hardware state when
restarting. If the supplies are not actually disabled due to board
limits or sharing with other active devices this notifier allows the
driver to avoid unneeded reinitialisation, particularly when used with
runtime PM.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
If the regulator constraints are empty and there is no voltage
reported then nothing will be added to the text displayed for the
constraints, leading to random stack data being printed. This is
unlikely to happen for practical regulators since most will at
least report a voltage but should still be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Currently it is possible for regulator_bulk_{enable,disable} operations to
generate unbalanced regulator_{disable,enable} calls in its error path.
In case of an error only those regulators of the bulk operation which actually
had been enabled/disabled should get their original state restored.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Since some regulators in the system may not support suspend mode
configuration we need to allow some regulators to have a missing
suspend mode configuration. Do this by requiring that disabled
regulators are explicitly flagged and then skip over regulators
that have no state specified.
Try to avoid surprises by warning the if we could set the state
but no configuration is provided. This also ensures that an all
zeros configuration generates a warning rather than silently
disabling the regulator.
Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Some of the regulator API functions have code to allow the machine
constraints to override the device supplied name for the regulator
in the constraints in order to help tie logging to supplies on the
board and disambiguate when there is more than one regulator chip
in the system. Factor this code out into a new rdev_get_name()
function and use it throughout the regulator API so that we always
use the same name.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
When voltage or current constraints are either missing or specify
a range display the actual setting along with the constraints if
we can. This can aid debugging of configuration problems.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
It makes sense to do all the voltage configuration in the one split
out function.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This allows constraints to take effect on regulators that support
voltage setting but for which the board does not specify a voltage
range (for example, because it is fixed correctly at system startup).
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If we're going to log an error we may as well log what the error
code that we're failing on is.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This makes _regulator_enable() properly handle the case where
a regulator is already on when you try to enable it. Currently
it will erroneously handle positive return values as an error.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The regulator_enable() code wasn't actually checking that the
machine constraints had given permission to enable the regulator.
Add code to do that, but only if the regulator is not already on
due to something like always_on or being left on at startup since
in those cases there's no physical change being introduced and the
constraint wouldn't make any sense.
Also add matching code for disable(). We need to do less there since
either regulator_enable() should have succeeded first or the board
setup makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Allows use by more of the internal regulator API code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The patch to add support for looking up consumers by device name
had the side effect of causing us to require a device which is
at best premature since at least cpufreq still operates outside
the device model. Remove that requirement.
Reported-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
We're probably going to start oopsing fairly soon after this happens.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Simplify checking of support for voltage ranges by providing an API which
wraps the existing count and list operations.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Some consumers require complete control of the regulator and can't
tolerate sharing it with other consumers, most commonly because they need
to have the regulator actually disabled so can't have other consumers
forcing it on. This new regulator_get_exclusive() API call allows these
consumers to explicitly request this, documenting the assumptions that
they are making.
In order to simplify coding of such consumers the use count for regulators
they request is forced to match the enabled state of the regulator when
it is requested. This is not possible for consumers which can share
regulators due to the need to keep track of the ownership of use counts.
A new API call is used rather than an additional argument to the existing
regulator_get() in order to avoid merge headaches with driver code in
other trees.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Follow the approach suggested by Russell King and implemented by him in
the clkdev API and allow consumer device supply mapings to be set up
using the dev_name() for the consumer instead of the struct device.
In order to avoid making existing machines instabuggy and creating merge
issues the use of struct device is still supported for the time being.
This resolves problems working with buses such as I2C which make the
struct device available late providing that the final device name is
known, which is the case for most embedded systems with fixed setups.
Consumers must still use the struct device when calling regulator_get().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This is useful for implementing get_status() in terms of get_mode().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Default voltage constraints were being provided for fixed voltage
regulator where board constraints were not provided but these constraints
used INT_MIN as the default minimum voltage which is not a valid value
since it is less than zero. Use 1uV instead.
Also set the default values we set in the constraints themselves since
otherwise the max_uV constraint we determine will not be stored in the
actual constraint strucutre and will therefore not be used.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
During regulator registration, any error after device_register() will
cause a double-free on the struct regulator_dev 'rdev'. The bug is in
drivers/regulator/core.c:regulator_register():
...
scrub:
device_unregister(&rdev->dev);
clean:
kfree(rdev); <---
rdev = ERR_PTR(ret);
goto out;
...
device_unregister() calls regulator_dev_release() which frees rdev. The
subsequent kfree corrupts memory and causes some OMAP3 systems to oops on
boot in regulator_get().
Applies against 2.6.30-rc3.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
When regulator_desc->type is something different from REGULATOR_VOLTAGE or REGULATOR_CURRENT
the if should probably return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
- !E == C
+ E != C
)
Signed-off-by: Diego Liziero <diegoliz@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
I removed the extra semi-colon and indented the return statement.
The unreachable code was found by smatch (http://repo.or.cz/w/smatch.git).
The patch was compile tested.
regards,
dan carpenter
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
At present it is not possible for machine constraints to disable
regulators which have been left on when the system starts, for example
as a result of fixed default configurations in hardware. This means that
power may be wasted by these regulators if they are not in use.
Provide intial support for this with a late_initcall which will disable
any unused regulators if the machine has enabled this feature by calling
regulator_has_full_constraints(). If this has not been called then print
a warning to encourage users to fully specify their constraints so that
we can change this to be the default behaviour in future.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Don't set use_count for regulators that are enabled at boot since this
stops the supply being disabled by well-behaved consumers which do
balanced enables and disabled. Any consumers which don't do disables
which are not matched by enables are unable to share regulators - shared
regulators are the common case so the API should facilitate them.
Consumers that want to disable regulators that are enabled when they
start have two options:
- Do a regulator_enable() prior to the disable to bring the use count
in sync with the hardware state; this will ensure that if the
regulator was enabled by another driver then this consumer will play
nicely with it.
- Use regulator_force_disable(); this explicitly bypasses any checks
done by the core and documents the inability of the driver to share
the supply.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Fix some refcounting issues in the regulator framework, supporting
regulator_disable() for regulators that were enabled at boot time
via machine constraints:
- Update those regulators' usecounts after enabling, so they
can cleanly be disabled at that level.
- Remove the problematic per-consumer usecount, so there's
only one level of enable/disable.
Buggy consumers could notice different bug symptoms. The main
example would be refcounting bugs; also, any (out-of-tree) users
of the experimental regulator_set_optimum_mode() stuff which
don't call it when they're done using a regulator.
This is a net minor codeshrink.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The consumer can print a message if required, some consumers may have
optional regulators and wish to downgrade the logging for them or ignore
their absence.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Rather than incrementing the reference count for boot_on regulators
(which prevents them being disabled later on) simply force the
regulator to be enabled when applying the constraints. Previously
boot_on was essentially equivalent to always_on.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Specifying voltage constraints is optional (and only needed if the
consumer is allowed to change the voltage) so don't complain unless
a voltage has been specified.
Also avoid surprises with a dangling else while we're here.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Add a basic mechanism for regulators to report the discrete
voltages they support: list_voltage() enumerates them using
selectors numbered from 0 to an upper bound.
Use those methods to force machine-level constraints into bounds.
(Example: regulator supports 1.8V, 2.4V, 2.6V, 3.3V, and board
constraints for that rail are 2.0V to 3.6V ... so the range of
voltages is then 2.4V to 3.3V on this board.)
Export those voltages to the regulator consumer interface, so for
example regulator hooked up to an MMC/SD/SDIO slot can report the
actual voltage options available to cards connected there.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This is useful when wishing to run in a fixed operating mode that isn't
the default.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Update the documentation to suggest the use of datasheet names for
the supplies requested by regulator consumers. Doing this makes it
easier to tie the design for a given platform up with the requirements
of the driver for a consumer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Currently regulator_unregister does not clear regulator <--> consumer
mapping.
This patch introduces unset_regulator_supplies that clear the map.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Commit 872ed3fe176833f7d43748eb88010da4bbd2f983 caused regulator drivers
to take the struct regulator_dev lock themselves which requires that the
struct be visible to them. Band aid this by making the struct visible.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Rather than having the regulator init data read from the platform_data
member of the struct device that is registered for the regulator make
the init data an explict argument passed in when registering. This
allows drivers to use the platform data for their own purposes if they
wish.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Regulator: Push lock out of _notifier_call_chain and into caller functions
(side effect of fixing deadlock in regulator_force_disable)
+ Add a voltage changed event.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Based on previous LKML discussions:
* Update docs for regulator sysfs class attributes to highlight
the fact that all current attributes are intended to be control
inputs, including notably "state" and "opmode" which previously
implied otherwise.
* Define a new regulator driver get_status() method, which is the
first method reporting regulator outputs instead of inputs.
It can report on/off and error status; or instead of simply
"on", report the actual operating mode.
For the moment, this is a sysfs-only interface, not accessible to
regulator clients. Such clients can use the current notification
interfaces to detect errors, if the regulator reports them.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Prevent registration of duplicate "struct regulator" names.
They'd be unavailable, and clearly indicate something wrong.
[Edited to remove check for NULL consumer device until we have a
solution for things like cpufreq -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
