Allows us to gut a BO of it's backing store when the driver says that it
isn't needed any more.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Rename ttm_bo_add_ttm to ttm_tt_create and move it into ttm_tt.c.
v2: separate the cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Never used as parameter, the only driver actually using this is nouveau
and there it is initialized after the BO is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Only used by the AGP backend and there it can be easily accessed using
ttm->bdev->glob.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The pointer is available as bo->bdev->glob as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Because ttm_bo_force_list_clean() is only called on two occasions:
1. By ttm_bo_evict_mm() during suspend.
2. By ttm_bo_clean_mm() when the driver unloads.
On both cases we absolutely don't want any memory allocation failure.
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
for saving memory and more bit flag can be used in future
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(v2): Remove stray ; noticed by Felix
Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct indentation and {} brace style.
Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This to allow drivers to choose to avoid OOM invocation and handle
page allocation failures instead.
v2:
Remove extra new lines.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Missed in the patche:
dc94777 drm/ttm: enable swapout for reserved BOs during allocation.
don't unreserve the BO if it is not reserved by itself.
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
If ttm_bo_swapout doesn't own the lock, don't release it. Someone
else probably depends on it still being locked.
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
A BO that's already swapped would be added back to the swap-LRU list
for example if its validation failed under high memory pressure. This
could later lead to swapping it out again and leaking previous swap
storage.
This commit adds a condition to prevent that from happening.
v2: Check page_flags instead of swap_storage
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
if the bo shares same reservation object then not lock it again
at swapout time to make it possible to swap out.
v2: refine the commmit message
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
extract a function as ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable since eviction and
swapout can share same logic.
v2: modify commit message and add description in the code
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
forward the operation context to ttm_tt_bind as well,
and the ultimate goal is swapout enablement for reserved BOs.
v2: use common term rather than amd specific
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
forward the operation context to ttm_mem_global_alloc as well, and the
ultimate goal is swapout enablement for reserved BOs
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
remove the extra indirection because we have only one implementation anyway
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Thomas actually noticed that, but I didn't realized what he meant until
now.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use pr_debug instead of TTM_DEBUG, fix the lockdep assert and remove the
unused constant.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use the reservation wrapper for this.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We only need to wait for the contended lock when the reservation object is
shared or when we want to remove everything. A trylock should be sufficient
in all other cases.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
include ttm_bo_move_memcpy and ttm_bo_move_ttm
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
allow eviction of BOs reserved by the caller when they are
not part of the current working set.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add some statistics how many bytes we have moved.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of passing the parameters manually.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of passing down the parameters manually to every function.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of specifying interruptible and no_wait_gpu manually.
v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of specifying if sleeping should be interruptible.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Give moving a BO into place an operation context to work with.
v2: rebased
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is no guarantee that the next entry on the ddelete list stays on
the list when we drop the locks.
Completely rework this mess by moving processed entries on a temporary
list.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The code path isn't hit at the moment, but we need to take the lock to
add the BO back to the LRU.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Deleted BOs with the same reservation object can be reaped even if they
can't be reserved.
v2: rebase and we still need to remove/add the BO from/to the LRU.
v3: fix remove/add one more time, cleanup the logic a bit
v4: we should still check if the eviction is valuable
v5: add comment suggested by Michel
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Needed for the next patch.
v2: actually predicate all unlocks
v3: add some cleanups suggested by Michel.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Consistently use the reservation object wrappers instead of accessing
the ww_mutex directly.
Additional to that use the reservation object wrappers directly instead of
calling __ttm_bo_reserve with fixed parameters.
v2: fix typo
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of having a confusing wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Needed for the next patch and makes the code quite a bit easier to
understand.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fixes a use-after-free due to a race condition in
ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock, which allows one task to reserve a BO
and destroy its ttm_resv while another task is waiting for it to signal
in reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu.
v2:
* Always initialize bo->ttm_resv in ttm_bo_init_reserved
(Christian König)
Fixes: 0d2bd2ae04 "drm/ttm: fix memory leak while individualizing BOs"
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> # v1
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
after individualize we need manually call reservation_object_fini()
if all fences on resv signaled during test, otherwise kmemory leak
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We need to free the reservation object before we take the BO
from the delayed delete list.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
With shared reservation objects __ttm_bo_reserve() can easily fail even on
destroyed BOs. This prevents correct handling when we need to individualize
the reservation object.
Fix this by individualizing the object before even trying to reserve it.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
we observe abnormal number from:
/sys/devices/virtual/drm/amdttm/buffer_objects/bo_count
bo_count is atomic_inc which is "int" type,
shouldn't explicitly turn it to unsigned long.
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fixes a false positive from might_sleep(). The reservation object is freshly
initialized, so nobody else can hold the mutex but the function is
called from atomic context.
v2: Correctly invert the check as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Provide the drm printer directly instead of just the callback.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use the BOs reservation object when it is put on the ddelete list. This way we
avoid delaying freeing up the BO because of new fences on the reservation object.
This is used by dma-buf and amdgpu's VM page tables.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
With shared reservation objects the assumption that no fence
could have been added isn't true any more.
Additional to that the BO is about to be destroyed, so removing the
fences now has no advantage whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The ret must be 0 here, otherwise, the function will return after init_mem_type.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
