PRM driver now has a generic API for deasserting hardware resets. SoC
specific support functions are registered through the prm_ll_data.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Acked-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
PRM device instance can vary depending on SoC. We already handle the
same during reset of the device, However, this is also needed
for other logic instances. So, first abstract this out to a generic
function.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Split omap2_set_globals_prcm() into PRM, CM, and PRCM_MPU variants, since
these are all separate IP blocks. This should make it easier to move the
PRM, CM, PRCM_MPU code into drivers/ in future patchsets.
At this point arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/prcm.h is empty; a
subsequent patch will remove it, and remove the #include from all the
files that #include it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Tested-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
The warm reset function was still using the obsolete API.
Replace it by the new one and move the file to the proper c file.
Change the function names to stick to the file convention as
suggested by Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>:
prm_xxx -> prminst_xxx
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
The RSTCTRL register was accessed using an absolute address.
The usage of hardcoded macros to calculate virtual address from physical
one should be avoided as much as possible.
The usage of an offset will allow future improvement like migration from
the current architecture code toward a module driver.
Update prm_xxx accessors, move definition to the proper header file and
update copyrights.
Change the s16 register offset parameter to u16.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: use '_prminst_' in function names that are part of the
prminst44xx.c file]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
