Introduce kernel parameter acpi_sleep=sci_force_enable
some laptop requires SCI_EN being set directly on resume,
or else they hung somewhere in the resume code path.
We already have a blacklist for these laptops but we still need
this option, especially when debugging some suspend/resume problems,
in case there are systems that need this workaround and are not yet
in the blacklist.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
backlight_device_register may return an ERR_PTR
value rather than a valid pointer.
Problem found by Julia Lawall, properly fixed by Zhang Rui.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
AML code always sends notifications to ACPI video device,
even if we disable the ACPI backlight control by using
boot option "acpi_backlight=vendor".
In this case we should not print any warning message.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13671#c14
Sigend-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Executing _OSC returns a buffer, which has an acpi object in it.
Don't directly returns the buffer, instead, we return the acpi object's
buffer. This fixes a regression since caller of acpi_run_osc expects
an acpi object's buffer returned.
Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
When calling _PDC, we really only need the handle to the processor
to call the method; we don't look at any other parts of the
struct acpi_processor * given to us.
In the early path, when we walk the namespace, we are given the
handle directly, so just pass it through to acpi_processor_set_pdc()
without stuffing it into a wasteful struct acpi_processor allocated
on the stack each time
This saves 2834 bytes of stack.
Update the interface accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We have the acpi_object_list * right there in acpi_processor_set_pdc()
so it doesn't seem necessary for an entire helper function just to
free it.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_processor_eval_pdc() really only needs a handle and an
acpi_object_list * to do its work.
No need to pass in a struct acpi_processor *, so let's be more specific
about what we want.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_processor_init_pdc() isn't really doing anything interesting
with the struct acpi_processor * parameter. Its real job is to allocate
the buffer for the _PDC bits.
So rename the function to acpi_processor_alloc_pdc(), and just return
the struct acpi_object_list * it's supposed to allocate.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The x86 and ia64 implementations of the function in $subject are
exactly the same.
Also, since the arch-specific implementations of setting _PDC have
been completely hollowed out, remove the empty shells.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
set in the input obj_list buffer.
There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Both x86 and ia64 initialize _PDC with mostly common bit settings.
Factor out the common settings and leave the arch-specific ones alone.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The x86 and ia64 implementations of arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc()
are almost exactly the same. The only difference is in what bits
they set in obj_list buffer.
Combine the boilerplate memory management code, and leave the
arch-specific bit twiddling in separate implementations.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
arch dependent helper function that tells us if we should attempt to
evaluate _PDC on this machine or not.
The x86 implementation assumes that the CPUs in the machine must be
homogeneous, and that you cannot mix CPUs of different vendors.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT
attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT.
Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the
EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT
is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later.
This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined
methods.
Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it
as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are.
Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows
implementation more closely.
Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads
the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly.
The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method
to cover the hotplug case.
Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fix a win7 compability issue on Asus K50IJ.
Here is the _BCM method of this laptop:
Method (_BCM, 1, NotSerialized)
{
If (LGreaterEqual (OSFG, OSVT))
{
If (LNotEqual (OSFG, OSW7))
{
Store (One, BCMD)
Store (GCBL (Arg0), Local0)
Subtract (0x0F, Local0, LBTN)
^^^SBRG.EC0.STBR ()
...
}
Else
{
DBGR (0x0B, Zero, Zero, Arg0)
Store (Arg0, LBTN)
^^^SBRG.EC0.STBR ()
...
}
}
}
LBTN is used to store the index of the brightness level in the _BCL.
GCBL is a method that convert the percentage value to the index value.
If _OSI(Windows 2009) is not disabled, LBTN is stored a percentage
value which is surely beyond the end of _BCL package.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Due to the merge of processor_start() (declared with __cpuinit) into
processor_add(), a section mismatch warning appears:
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x4d59d): Section mismatch in reference
from the function acpi_processor_add() to the function
.cpuinit.text:acpi_processor_power_init()
...
This patch fixes the warning by declaring processor_add() as __cpuinit
and also declares acpi_processor_add_fs() as __cpuinit as it is only
used in acpi_processor_add().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
v2->v1:
.improve debug info as suggedted by Bjorn,Kenji
.API is using uuid string as suggested by Alexey
Add an API to execute _OSC. A lot of devices can have this method, so add a
generic API.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
I got following warning on ia64 box:
In function 'acpi_processor_power_verify':
642: warning: passing argument 2 of 'smp_call_function_single' from
incompatible pointer type
This smp_call_function_single() was introduced by a commit
f833bab87f:
> @@ -162,8 +162,9 @@
> pr->power.timer_broadcast_on_state = state;
> }
>
> -static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(void *arg)
> {
> + struct acpi_processor *pr = (struct acpi_processor *) arg;
> unsigned long reason;
>
> reason = pr->power.timer_broadcast_on_state < INT_MAX ?
> @@ -635,7 +636,8 @@
> working++;
> }
>
> - lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(pr);
> + smp_call_function_single(pr->id, lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast,
> + pr, 1);
>
> return (working);
> }
The problem is that the lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() has 2 versions:
One is real code that modified in the above commit, and the other is NOP
code that used when !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3:
static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr) { }
So I got warning because of !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3.
We really want to do nothing here on !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3, so
modify lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() of real version to use
smp_call_function_single() in it.
Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c: In function 'power_saving_thread':
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:103: warning: 'preferred_cpu' may be used uninitialized in this function
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Removed some stray whitespaces
Added whitespace when needed for legibility
Removed unneeded curly braces
Removed useless void casts
Removed unnecessary local variable initialization
Renamed variables to help out with 80-column fixes
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Instead of adding a (struct dock_station **) to our dock device's
platform data, we can add the (struct dock_station *) directly.
This change saves us some ugly casting and improves readability.
The cost of making this change is an extra 290 bytes of stack usage,
but this is an infrequently called code-path and unlikely to cause
the kernel to blow up.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Move the call to platform_device_register_simple so that we do it
before allocating and initializing our struct dock_station.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
We only use it in one spot, so it probably gets optimized out, but there's
still no need to use a global variable for this.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
There's no real need to have a separate allocation step when adding
a dock dependent device.
Combining the two functions is both logical and helps with legibility.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Users can force a passive trip point for a thermal zone that does not have
_PSV defined in ACPI by setting the passive attribute in sysfs. It's
useful to display such trip points in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone.
.../TZ1/cooling_mode:<setting not supported>
.../TZ1/polling_frequency:polling frequency: 10 seconds
.../TZ1/state:state: ok
.../TZ1/temperature:temperature: 53 C
.../TZ1/trip_points:critical (S5): 110 C
.../TZ1/trip_points:passive (forced): 95 C
And if not set (passive is 0):
.../TZ1/trip_points:passive (forced):<not set>
Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
NUMA_NO_NODE has been exported globally and thus it can replace NID_INVAL
in the acpi code.
Also removes the unused acpi_unmap_pxm_to_node() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On some laptops it will return NOTIFY_OK(non-zero) when calling the ACPI LID
notifier. Then it is used as the result of ACPI LID resume function, which
will complain the following warning message in course of suspend/resume:
>PM: Device PNP0C0D:00 failed to resume: error 1
This patch is to eliminate the above warning message.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14782
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This message shows up for each cpu. Print as debug messages.
[ 12.893967] processor ACPI0007:00: registered as cooling_device0
[ 12.907838] processor ACPI0007:01: registered as cooling_device1
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Add kernel tainting after overriding an ACPI control method successfully.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This change moves the check for a valid Thread ID structure up a
few lines to insure that the check is made before the structure
is actually used.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This change will automatically remove embedded and trailing NULL
package elements from returned package objects that are defined
to containe a variable number of sub-packages. The driver is then
presented with a package with no null elements to deal with.
ACPICA BZ 819.
http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=819
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
