When execveat test is skipped because of unmet dependencies and/or
unsupported configuration, it exits with error which is treated as
a fail by the Kselftest framework. This leads to false negative
result even when the test could not be run.
Change it to return kselftest skip code when a test gets skipped to
clearly report that the test could not be run.
Change it to use ksft_exit_skip() when kernel doesn't support execveat.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@kernel.org>
When creating a pathname close to PATH_MAX to test execveat, factor in
the current working directory path otherwise we end up with an absolute
path that is longer than PATH_MAX. While execveat() may succeed, subsequent
calls to the kernel from the runtime environment which are required to
successfully execute the test binary/script may fail because of this.
To keep the semantics of the test the same, rework the relative pathname
part of the test to be relative to the root directory so it isn't
decreased by the length of the current working directory path.
Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
On systems which don't implement sys_execveat(), this test produces a
lot of output.
Add a check at the beginning to see if the syscall is present, and if
not just note one error and return.
When we run on a system that doesn't implement the syscall we will get
ENOSYS back from the kernel, so change the logic that handles
__NR_execveat not being defined to also use ENOSYS rather than -ENOSYS.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
When the shell fails to invoke a script because its path name
is too long (ENAMETOOLONG), most shells return 127 to indicate
command not found. However, some systems report 126 (which POSIX
suggests should indicate a non-executable file) for this case,
so allow that too.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
On 32-bit:
execveat.c: In function 'check_execveat_pathmax':
execveat.c:183: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t'
execveat.c:187: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t'
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
