All WOPCM error messages are device specific, so use
device specific error functions.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816105501.31020-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
If WOPCM layout is already locked in HW we shouldn't continue
with our own partitioning as it could be likely different and
we will be unable to enforce it and fail. Instead we should try
to reuse what is already programmed, maybe there will be a fit.
This should enable us to reload driver with slightly different
HuC firmware (or even without HuC) without need to reboot.
v2: reordered/rebased
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816105501.31020-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We can do WOPCM partitioning using rough estimates and limits
and perform detailed check as separate step.
v2: oops! s/max/min
v3: consolidate overflow checks (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816105501.31020-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
While we need to know WOPCM size to do this sanity check, it has more to
do with FW than with WOPCM. Let's move the check to fetch phase, it's
not like WOPCM is going to grow in the meantime.
v2: rebased
v3: use __intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816105501.31020-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
No need to define it globally as we're only using it in wopcm.c
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190807170034.8440-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
For meaningful WOPCM partitioning we need GuC (and optionally HuC)
firmware size(s) and we shouldn't just rely on GuC support flag,
as we might fail to fetch GuC firmware and it's size will be 0
and all calculations will be just wrong/useless.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190807170034.8440-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We don't have to immediately fail on WOPCM partitioning, we can wait
until we will start programming WOPCM registers. This should give us
more options if we decide to restore fallback in case of GuC failures.
v3: rebased
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-7-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
With i915 added to i915_inject_probe_failure we can use dedicated
printk when injecting artificial load failure.
Also make this function look like other i915 functions that return
error code and make it more flexible to return any provided error
code instead of previously assumed -ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
The register we write are not WOPCM regs but uC ones related to how
GuC and HuC are going to use the WOPCM, so it makes logical sense
for them to be programmed as part of uc_init_hw. The WOPCM map on the
other side is not uC-specific (although that is our main use-case), so
keep that separate.
v2: move write_and_verify to uncore, fix log, re-use err_out tag,
add intel_wopcm_guc_base, fix log
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We have several HAS_* checks for GuC and HuC but we mostly use HAS_GUC
and HAS_HUC, with only 1 exception. Since our HW always has either
both uC or neither of them, just replace all the checks with a unified
HAS_UC.
v2: use HAS_GT_UC (Michal)
v3: fix comment (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Being part of the GT HW, it make sense to keep the guc/huc structures
inside the GT structure. To help with the encapsulation work done by the
following patches, both structures are placed inside a new intel_uc
container. Although this results in code with ugly nested dereferences
(i915->gt.uc.guc...), it saves us the extra work required in moving
the structures twice (i915 -> gt -> uc). The following patches will
reduce the number of places where we try to access the guc/huc
structures directly from i915 and reduce the ugliness.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Use the "_probe" nomenclature not only in i915_driver_probe() helper
name but also in other related function / variable names for
consistency. Only the userspace exposed name of a related module
parameter is left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712112429.740-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c:513: warning: Function parameter or member 'gt' not described in 'intel_mocs_init_l3cc_table'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c:513: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev_priv' description in 'intel_mocs_init_l3cc_table'
intel_vgt_balloon/deballoon, i915_ggtt_probe_hw intel_wopcm_init_hw need
similar treatment
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621131640.28864-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The size has been increased to 2MB starting from Gen11. GuC and HuC FWs
fit in 1MB so we were fine even with the legacy define, but let's still
move to the correct one before the blobs grow to avoid being caught off
guard in the future.
v2: return early if the platform doesn't have GuC, fix nits (Michal)
Bspec: 12690
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
[ickle: use SZ consistently]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190606224225.14287-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of
gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter,
so we don't require one macro for each gen.
The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros:
@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN2(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 2)
|
- IS_GEN3(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3)
|
- IS_GEN4(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 4)
|
- IS_GEN5(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5)
|
- IS_GEN6(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 6)
|
- IS_GEN7(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 7)
|
- IS_GEN8(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 8)
|
- IS_GEN9(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 9)
|
- IS_GEN10(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 10)
|
- IS_GEN11(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 11)
)
v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than
using the bitmask
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Add a fault injection point in the WOPCM initialization path.
v4:
Move the injection inside the WOPCM init function.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Bartmiński <jakub.bartminski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180727141148.30874-5-jakub.bartminski@intel.com
There seems to be no reason for doing extra work on WOPCM partitioning
in the case GuC is not used, as the partitioning will not be used by the
intel_wopcm_init_hw function anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Bartmiński <jakub.bartminski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180727141148.30874-2-jakub.bartminski@intel.com
GuC Address Space and WOPCM Layout diagrams won't be generated correctly by
sphinx build if not using proper reST syntax.
This patch uses reST literal blocks to make sure GuC Address Space and
WOPCM Layout diagrams to be generated correctly, and it also corrects some
errors in the diagram description.
v2:
- Fixed errors in diagram description
v3:
- Updated GuC Address Space kernel-doc based on Michal's suggestion
v4:
- Added WOPCM layout and GuC address space docs into i915.rst (Joonas)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1521763162-11424-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
GuC WOPCM registers are write-once registers. Current driver code accesses
these registers without checking the accessibility to these registers which
will lead to unpredictable driver behaviors if these registers were touch
by other components (such as faulty BIOS code).
This patch moves the GuC WOPCM registers updating code into intel_wopcm.c
and adds check before and after the update to GuC WOPCM registers so that
we can make sure the driver is in a known state after writing to these
write-once registers.
v6:
- Made sure module reloading won't bug the kernel while doing
locking status checking
v7:
- Fixed patch format issues
v8:
- Fixed coding style issue on register lock bit macro definition (Sagar)
v9:
- Avoided to use redundant !! to cast uint to bool (Chris)
- Return error code instead of GEM_BUG_ON for locked with invalid register
values case (Sagar)
- Updated guc_wopcm_hw_init to use guc_wopcm as first parameter (Michal)
- Added code to set and validate the HuC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC bit in GuC
WOPCM offset register based on the presence of HuC firmware (Michal)
- Use bit fields instead of macros for GuC WOPCM flags (Michal)
v10:
- Refined variable names, removed redundant comments (Joonas)
- Introduced lockable_reg to handle the write once register write and
propagate the write error to caller (Joonas)
- Used lockable_reg abstraction to avoid locking bit check on generic
i915_reg_t (Michal)
- Added log message for error paths (Michal)
- Removed hw_updated flag and only relies on real hardware status
v11:
- Replaced lockable_reg with simplified function (Michal)
- Used new macros for locking bits of WOPCM size/offset registers instead
of using BIT(0) directly (Michal)
- use intel_wopcm_init_hw() called from intel_gem_init_hw() to do GuC
WOPCM register setup instead of calling from intel_uc_init_hw() (Michal)
v12:
- Updated function kernel-doc to align with code changes (Michal)
- Updated code to use wopcm pointer directly (Michal)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
BSpec: 10875, 10833
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-5-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
On CNL A0 and Gen9, there's a hardware restriction that requires the
available GuC WOPCM size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size.
This patch adds new verification code to ensure the available GuC WOPCM
size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size on both Gen9 and CNL
A0.
v6:
- Extended HuC FW size check against GuC WOPCM size to all
Gen9 and CNL A0 platforms
v7:
- Fixed patch format issues
v8:
- Renamed variables and functions to avoid ambiguity (Joonas)
- Updated commit message and comments to be more comprehensive (Sagar)
v9:
- Moved code that is not related to restriction check into a separate
patch and updated the commit message accordingly (Sagar/Michal)
- Avoided to call uc_get_fw_size for better layer isolation (Michal)
v10:
- Shorten function names and reorganized size_check code to have clear
isolation (Joonas)
- Removed unnecessary comments (Joonas)
v11:
- Fixed logic error in size check (Michal)
v12:
- Add space between "HuC FW" and "(%uKiB)" in error message (Michal)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
BSpec: 10875
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-4-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
CNL has its specific reserved GuC WOPCM size for RC6 and other hardware
contexts.
This patch updates the code to return CNL specific reserved GuC WOPCM size
for RC6 and other hardware contexts so that the GuC WOPCM size can be
calculated correctly for CNL.
v9:
- Created a new patch for these changes originally made in v8 4/6 patch of
this series (Sagar/Michal)
v10:
- Used if-else ladder to the returning of context sizes (Joonas)
v11:
- Removed GUC_ prefix from context size macro (Michal)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
Bspec: 12690
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-3-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
Hardware may have specific restrictions on GuC WOPCM offset and size. On
Gen9, the value of the GuC WOPCM size register needs to be larger than the
value of GuC WOPCM offset register + a Gen9 specific offset (144KB) for
reserved GuC WOPCM. Fail to enforce such a restriction on GuC WOPCM size
will lead to GuC firmware execution failures. On the other hand, with
current static GuC WOPCM offset and size values (512KB for both offset and
size), the GuC WOPCM size verification will fail on Gen9 even if it can be
fixed by lowering the GuC WOPCM offset by calculating its value based on
HuC firmware size (which is likely less than 200KB on Gen9), so that we can
have a GuC WOPCM size value which is large enough to pass the GuC WOPCM
size check.
This patch updates the reserved GuC WOPCM size for RC6 context on Gen9 to
24KB to strictly align with the Gen9 GuC WOPCM layout. It also adds support
to verify the GuC WOPCM size aganist the Gen9 hardware restrictions. To
meet all above requirements, let's provide dynamic partitioning of the
WOPCM that will be based on platform specific HuC/GuC firmware sizes.
v2:
- Removed intel_wopcm_init (Ville/Sagar/Joonas)
- Renamed and Moved the intel_wopcm_partition into intel_guc (Sagar)
- Removed unnecessary function calls (Joonas)
- Init GuC WOPCM partition as soon as firmware fetching is completed
v3:
- Fixed indentation issues (Chris)
- Removed layering violation code (Chris/Michal)
- Created separat files for GuC wopcm code (Michal)
- Used inline function to avoid code duplication (Michal)
v4:
- Preset the GuC WOPCM top during early GuC init (Chris)
- Fail intel_uc_init_hw() as soon as GuC WOPCM partitioning failed
v5:
- Moved GuC DMA WOPCM register updating code into intel_wopcm.c
- Took care of the locking status before writing to GuC DMA
Write-Once registers. (Joonas)
v6:
- Made sure the GuC WOPCM size to be multiple of 4K (4K aligned)
v8:
- Updated comments and fixed naming issues (Sagar/Joonas)
- Updated commit message to include more description about the hardware
restriction on GuC WOPCM size (Sagar)
v9:
- Minor changes variable names and code comments (Sagar)
- Added detailed GuC WOPCM layout drawing (Sagar/Michal)
- Refined macro definitions to be reader friendly (Michal)
- Removed redundent check to valid flag (Michal)
- Unified first parameter for exported GuC WOPCM functions (Michal)
- Refined the name and parameter list of hardware restriction checking
functions (Michal)
v10:
- Used shorter function name for internal functions (Joonas)
- Moved init-ealry function into c file (Joonas)
- Consolidated and removed redundant size checks (Joonas/Michal)
- Removed unnecessary unlikely() from code which is only called once
during boot (Joonas)
- More fixes to kernel-doc format and content (Michal)
- Avoided the use of PAGE_MASK for 4K pages (Michal)
- Added error log messages to error paths (Michal)
v11:
- Replaced intel_guc_wopcm with more generic intel_wopcm and attached
intel_wopcm to drm_i915_private instead intel_guc (Michal)
- dynamic calculation of GuC non-wopcm memory start (a.k.a WOPCM Top
offset from GuC WOPCM base) (Michal)
- Moved WOPCM marco definitions into .c source file (Michal)
- Exported WOPCM layout diagram as kernel-doc (Michal)
v12:
- Updated naming, function kernel-doc to align with new changes (Michal)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
- Corrected one tense error in comment (Sagar)
- Corrected typos and removed spurious comments (Joonas)
Bspec: 12690
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-2-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
