KVM uses swab32() when mediating GIC MMIO accesses if the GICV is badly
aligned, and the host and guest differ in endianness.
arm64 doesn't provide a __arch_swab32(), so __fswab32() is always backed
by the macro implementation that the compiler reduces to a single
instruction. But the static-inline causes problems for KVM if the compiler
chooses not to inline this function, it may not be located in the
__hyp_text where __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access() needs it.
Create our own __kvm_swab32() macro that calls ___constant_swab32()
directly. This way we know it will always be inlined.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200220165839.256881-3-james.morse@arm.com
Currently, the {read,write}_sysreg_el*() accessors for accessing
particular ELs' sysregs in the presence of VHE rely on some local
hacks and define their system register encodings in a way that is
inconsistent with the core definitions in <asm/sysreg.h>.
As a result, it is necessary to add duplicate definitions for any
system register that already needs a definition in sysreg.h for
other reasons.
This is a bit of a maintenance headache, and the reasons for the
_el*() accessors working the way they do is a bit historical.
This patch gets rid of the shadow sysreg definitions in
<asm/kvm_hyp.h>, converts the _el*() accessors to use the core
__msr_s/__mrs_s interface, and converts all call sites to use the
standard sysreg #define names (i.e., upper case, with SYS_ prefix).
This patch will conflict heavily anyway, so the opportunity
to clean up some bad whitespace in the context of the changes is
taken.
The change exposes a few system registers that have no sysreg.h
definition, due to msr_s/mrs_s being used in place of msr/mrs:
additions are made in order to fill in the gaps.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg31717.html
[Rebased to v4.21-rc1]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
[Rebased to v5.2-rc5, changelog updates]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general
public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org
licenses
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
host.
We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
behaviour differs for host and guest.
Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
fake a debug exception from the guest.
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Some code cares about the SPSR_ELx format for exceptions taken from
AArch32 to inspect or manipulate the SPSR_ELx value, which is already in
the SPSR_ELx format, and not in the AArch32 PSR format.
To separate these from cases where we care about the AArch32 PSR format,
migrate these cases to use the PSR_AA32_* definitions rather than
COMPAT_PSR_*.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Note that arm64 KVM does not support a compat KVM API, and always uses
the SPSR_ELx format, even for AArch32 guests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Proxying the cpuif accesses at EL2 makes use of vcpu_data_guest_to_host
and co, which check the endianness, which call into vcpu_read_sys_reg...
which isn't mapped at EL2 (it was inlined before, and got moved OoL
with the VHE optimizations).
The result is of course a nice panic. Let's add some specialized
cruft to keep the broken platforms that require this hack alive.
But, this code used vcpu_data_guest_to_host(), which expected us to
write the value to host memory, instead we have trapped the guest's
read or write to an mmio-device, and are about to replay it using the
host's readl()/writel() which also perform swabbing based on the host
endianness. This goes wrong when both host and guest are big-endian,
as readl()/writel() will undo the guest's swabbing, causing the
big-endian value to be written to device-memory.
What needs doing?
A big-endian guest will have pre-swabbed data before storing, undo this.
If its necessary for the host, writel() will re-swab it.
For a read a big-endian guest expects to swab the data after the load.
The hosts's readl() will correct for host endianness, giving us the
device-memory's value in the register. For a big-endian guest, swab it
as if we'd only done the load.
For a little-endian guest, nothing needs doing as readl()/writel() leave
the correct device-memory value in registers.
Tested on Juno with that rarest of things: a big-endian 64K host.
Based on a patch from Marc Zyngier.
Reported-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Fixes: bf8feb3964 ("arm64: KVM: vgic-v2: Add GICV access from HYP")
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
As we're about to change the way we map devices at HYP, we need
to move away from kern_hyp_va on an IO address.
One way of achieving this is to store the VAs in kvm_vgic_global_state,
and use that directly from the HYP code. This requires a small change
to create_hyp_io_mappings so that it can also return a HYP VA.
We take this opportunity to nuke the vctrl_base field in the emulated
distributor, as it is not used anymore.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
kvm_vgic_global_state is part of the read-only section, and is
usually accessed using a PC-relative address generation (adrp + add).
It is thus useless to use kern_hyp_va() on it, and actively problematic
if kern_hyp_va() becomes non-idempotent. On the other hand, there is
no way that the compiler is going to guarantee that such access is
always PC relative.
So let's bite the bullet and provide our own accessor.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
The vgic-v2-sr.c file now only contains the logic to replay unaligned
accesses to the virtual CPU interface on 16K and 64K page systems, which
is only relevant on 64-bit platforms. Therefore move this file to the
arm64 KVM tree, remove the compile directive from the 32-bit side
makefile, and remove the ifdef in the C file.
Since this file also no longer saves/restores anything, rename the file
to vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c to more accurately describe the logic in this
file.
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
