mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-11-24 14:10:49 +07:00
tty/isicom: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in WaitTillCardIsFree
The driver may sleep under a spinlock. The function call paths are: isicom_activate (acquire the spinlock) isicom_setup_board drop_dtr_rts WaitTillCardIsFree msleep --> may sleep isicom_set_termios isicom_config_port drop_dtr WaitTillCardIsFree msleep --> may sleep isicom_tiocmset drop_dtr WaitTillCardIsFree msleep --> may sleep Though "in_atomic" is used to check atomic context, but it is not recommended to use in driver code (see include/linux/preempt.h). To fix it, only using mdelay instead. This bug is found by my static analysis tool(DSAC) and checked by my code review. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be7e251d20
commit
fe8e7acea2
@ -219,13 +219,9 @@ static struct isi_port isi_ports[PORT_COUNT];
|
||||
static int WaitTillCardIsFree(unsigned long base)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int count = 0;
|
||||
unsigned int a = in_atomic(); /* do we run under spinlock? */
|
||||
|
||||
while (!(inw(base + 0xe) & 0x1) && count++ < 100)
|
||||
if (a)
|
||||
mdelay(1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
msleep(1);
|
||||
mdelay(1);
|
||||
|
||||
return !(inw(base + 0xe) & 0x1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user