AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git synced 2024-11-25 02:20:52 +07:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: verifier: MOV64 don't mark dst reg unbounded

Browse Source 
When check_alu_op() handles a BPF_MOV64 between two registers,
it calls check_reg_arg(DST_OP) on the dst register, marking it
as unbounded. If the src and dst register are the same, this
marks the src as unbounded, which can lead to unexpected errors
for further checks that rely on bounds info. For example:

	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2),
	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),

Results in:

	"math between ctx pointer and register with unbounded
	min value is not allowed"

check_alu_op() now uses check_reg_arg(DST_OP_NO_MARK), and MOVs
that need to mark the dst register (MOVIMM, MOV32) do so.

Added a test case for MOV64 dst == src, and dst != src.

Signed-off-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
Arthur Fabre 2018-07-31 18:17:22 +01:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent 194db0d958
commit fbeb1603bf
2 changed files with 30 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View File

@ -3238,8 +3238,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
}
/* check dest operand */
err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
/* check dest operand, mark as required later */
err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
if (err)
return err;
@ -3265,6 +3265,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
/* case: R = imm
* remember the value we stored into this reg
*/
/* clear any state __mark_reg_known doesn't set */
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
regs[insn->dst_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) {
__mark_reg_known(regs + insn->dst_reg,

26
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
View File

@ -12332,6 +12332,32 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "variable ctx access var_off=(0x0; 0x4)",
},
{
"mov64 src == dst",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2),
// Check bounds are OK
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"mov64 src != dst",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
// Check bounds are OK
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)