mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-03-27 03:20:35 +07:00
mac80211: fix rate mask reset
[ Upstream commit 1944015fe9c1d9fa5e9eb7ffbbb5ef8954d6753b ] Coverity reported the strange "if (~...)" condition that's always true. It suggested that ! was intended instead of ~, but upon further analysis I'm convinced that what really was intended was a comparison to 0xff/0xffff (in HT/VHT cases respectively), since this indicates that all of the rates are enabled. Change the comparison accordingly. I'm guessing this never really mattered because a reset to not having a rate mask is basically equivalent to having a mask that enables all rates. Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Fixes:2ffbe6d333
("mac80211: fix and optimize MCS mask handling") Fixes:b119ad6e72
("mac80211: add rate mask logic for vht rates") Reviewed-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212112213.36b38078f569.I8546a20c80bc1669058eb453e213630b846e107b@changeid Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
48d0b548b4
commit
f865127b1d
@ -2961,14 +2961,14 @@ static int ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask(struct wiphy *wiphy,
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < IEEE80211_HT_MCS_MASK_LEN; j++) {
|
||||
if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j]) {
|
||||
if (sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xff) {
|
||||
sdata->rc_has_mcs_mask[i] = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < NL80211_VHT_NSS_MAX; j++) {
|
||||
if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j]) {
|
||||
if (sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xffff) {
|
||||
sdata->rc_has_vht_mcs_mask[i] = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user