locking/ww_mutex: Use relaxed atomics

The stamp is a sequence number, we don't care about memory ordering.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-24 12:46:26 +01:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 84d82ec5b9
commit f4ec57b632

View File

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
struct ww_class *ww_class)
{
ctx->task = current;
ctx->stamp = atomic_long_inc_return(&ww_class->stamp);
ctx->stamp = atomic_long_inc_return_relaxed(&ww_class->stamp);
ctx->acquired = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
ctx->ww_class = ww_class;