iio: dac: ltc2632: drop some duplicated data

The channel data for ltc2632l12 and ltc2632h12 are identical. So there
is no gain in using two different (but identical) channel descriptions.
The only side effect of this change is some memory savings.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
Uwe Kleine-König 2020-01-30 14:15:48 +01:00 committed by Jonathan Cameron
parent b7dec2cb19
commit f243d0f0bd

View File

@ -192,37 +192,33 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec_ext_info ltc2632_ext_info[] = {
LTC2632_CHANNEL(1, _bits), \
}
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632l12, 12);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632l10, 10);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632l8, 8);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632h12, 12);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632h10, 10);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632h8, 8);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632x12, 12);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632x10, 10);
static DECLARE_LTC2632_CHANNELS(ltc2632x8, 8);
static const struct ltc2632_chip_info ltc2632_chip_info_tbl[] = {
[ID_LTC2632L12] = {
.channels = ltc2632l12_channels,
.channels = ltc2632x12_channels,
.vref_mv = 2500,
},
[ID_LTC2632L10] = {
.channels = ltc2632l10_channels,
.channels = ltc2632x10_channels,
.vref_mv = 2500,
},
[ID_LTC2632L8] = {
.channels = ltc2632l8_channels,
.channels = ltc2632x8_channels,
.vref_mv = 2500,
},
[ID_LTC2632H12] = {
.channels = ltc2632h12_channels,
.channels = ltc2632x12_channels,
.vref_mv = 4096,
},
[ID_LTC2632H10] = {
.channels = ltc2632h10_channels,
.channels = ltc2632x10_channels,
.vref_mv = 4096,
},
[ID_LTC2632H8] = {
.channels = ltc2632h8_channels,
.channels = ltc2632x8_channels,
.vref_mv = 4096,
},
};