mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-03-01 07:07:48 +07:00
virtio_net: use non-reentrant workqueue.
Michael S. Tsirkin also noticed that we could run the refill work multiple CPUs: if we kick off a refill on one CPU and then on another, they would both manipulate the queue at the same time (they use napi_disable to avoid racing against the receive handler itself). Tejun points out that this is what the WQ_NON_REENTRANT flag is for, and that there is a convenient system kthread we can use. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b2baed69e6
commit
f1776dade1
@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
|
||||
* we will *never* try to fill again. */
|
||||
if (still_empty)
|
||||
schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, HZ/2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
|
||||
if (vi->num < vi->max / 2) {
|
||||
if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_ATOMIC))
|
||||
schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Out of packets? */
|
||||
@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
|
||||
if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL))
|
||||
schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user