commoncap: Move cap_elevated calculation into bprm_set_creds

Instead of a separate function, open-code the cap_elevated test, which
lets us entirely remove bprm->cap_effective (to use the local "effective"
variable instead), and more accurately examine euid/egid changes via the
existing local "is_setid".

The following LTP tests were run to validate the changes:

	# ./runltp -f syscalls -s cap
	# ./runltp -f securebits
	# ./runltp -f cap_bounds
	# ./runltp -f filecaps

All kernel selftests for capabilities and exec continue to pass as well.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kees Cook 2017-07-18 15:25:28 -07:00
parent 46d98eb4e1
commit ee67ae7ef6
2 changed files with 10 additions and 45 deletions

View File

@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ struct linux_binprm {
* binfmt_script/misc).
*/
called_set_creds:1,
cap_effective:1,/* true if has elevated effective capabilities,
* false if not; except for init which inherits
* its parent's caps anyway */
/*
* True if most recent call to the commoncaps bprm_set_creds
* hook (due to multiple prepare_binprm() calls from the

View File

@ -285,15 +285,6 @@ int cap_capset(struct cred *new,
return 0;
}
/*
* Clear proposed capability sets for execve().
*/
static inline void bprm_clear_caps(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
cap_clear(bprm->cred->cap_permitted);
bprm->cap_effective = false;
}
/**
* cap_inode_need_killpriv - Determine if inode change affects privileges
* @dentry: The inode/dentry in being changed with change marked ATTR_KILL_PRIV
@ -443,7 +434,7 @@ static int get_file_caps(struct linux_binprm *bprm, bool *effective, bool *has_c
int rc = 0;
struct cpu_vfs_cap_data vcaps;
bprm_clear_caps(bprm);
cap_clear(bprm->cred->cap_permitted);
if (!file_caps_enabled)
return 0;
@ -476,13 +467,11 @@ static int get_file_caps(struct linux_binprm *bprm, bool *effective, bool *has_c
out:
if (rc)
bprm_clear_caps(bprm);
cap_clear(bprm->cred->cap_permitted);
return rc;
}
static int is_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
/**
* cap_bprm_set_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
* @bprm: The execution parameters, including the proposed creds
@ -587,8 +576,6 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
if (WARN_ON(!cap_ambient_invariant_ok(new)))
return -EPERM;
bprm->cap_effective = effective;
/*
* Audit candidate if current->cap_effective is set
*
@ -617,35 +604,16 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return -EPERM;
/* Check for privilege-elevated exec. */
bprm->cap_elevated = is_secureexec(bprm);
return 0;
}
/**
* is_secureexec - Determine whether a secure execution is required
* @bprm: The execution parameters
*
* Determine whether a secure execution is required, return 1 if it is, and 0
* if it is not.
*
* The credentials have been committed by this point, and so are no longer
* available through @bprm->cred.
*/
static int is_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
const struct cred *cred = bprm->cred;
kuid_t root_uid = make_kuid(cred->user_ns, 0);
if (!uid_eq(cred->uid, root_uid)) {
if (bprm->cap_effective)
return 1;
if (!cap_issubset(cred->cap_permitted, cred->cap_ambient))
return 1;
bprm->cap_elevated = 0;
if (is_setid) {
bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
} else if (!uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid)) {
if (effective ||
!cap_issubset(new->cap_permitted, new->cap_ambient))
bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
}
return (!uid_eq(cred->euid, cred->uid) ||
!gid_eq(cred->egid, cred->gid));
return 0;
}
/**