mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-15 01:46:51 +07:00
random: optimize add_interrupt_randomness
add_interrupt_randomess always wakes up code blocking on /dev/random. This wake up is done unconditionally. Unfortunately this means all interrupts take the wait queue spinlock, which can be rather expensive on large systems processing lots of interrupts. We saw 1% cpu time spinning on this on a large macro workload running on a large system. I believe it's a recent regression (?) Always check if there is a waiter on the wait queue before waking up. This check can be done without taking a spinlock. 1.06% 10460 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath | ---native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath | --0.57%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave | --0.56%--__wake_up_common_lock credit_entropy_bits add_interrupt_randomness handle_irq_event_percpu handle_irq_event handle_edge_irq handle_irq do_IRQ common_interrupt Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
25e3fca492
commit
e8e8a2e47d
@ -709,7 +709,8 @@ static void credit_entropy_bits(struct entropy_store *r, int nbits)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* should we wake readers? */
|
||||
if (entropy_bits >= random_read_wakeup_bits) {
|
||||
if (entropy_bits >= random_read_wakeup_bits &&
|
||||
wq_has_sleeper(&random_read_wait)) {
|
||||
wake_up_interruptible(&random_read_wait);
|
||||
kill_fasync(&fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user