AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git synced 2024-11-24 14:20:55 +07:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

iopoll: avoid -Wint-in-bool-context warning

Browse Source 
When we pass the result of a multiplication as the timeout or the delay,
we can get a warning from gcc-7:

  drivers/mmc/host/bcm2835.c:596:149: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:247:195: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_i2c.c:49:27: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]

The warning is a bit questionable inside of a macro, but this is
intentional on the side of the gcc developers.  It is also an indication
of another problem: we evaluate the timeout and sleep arguments multiple
times, which can have undesired side-effects when those are complex
expressions.

This changes the two iopoll variants to use local variables for storing
copies of the timeouts.  This adds some more type safety, and avoids
both the double-evaluation and the gcc warning.

Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81484
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170726133756.2161367-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171102114048.1526955-1-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Arnd Bergmann 2017-11-17 15:27:13 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 1e6270d07c
commit d15809f364
1 changed files with 15 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
include/linux/iopoll.h
View File

@ -42,18 +42,21 @@
*/
#define readx_poll_timeout(op, addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
({ \
ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
might_sleep_if(sleep_us); \
u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \
unsigned long __sleep_us = (sleep_us); \
ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \
might_sleep_if((__sleep_us) != 0); \
for (;;) { \
(val) = op(addr); \
if (cond) \
break; \
if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
if (__timeout_us && \
ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \
(val) = op(addr); \
break; \
} \
if (sleep_us) \
usleep_range((sleep_us >> 2) + 1, sleep_us); \
if (__sleep_us) \
usleep_range((__sleep_us >> 2) + 1, __sleep_us); \
} \
(cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \
})
@ -77,17 +80,20 @@
*/
#define readx_poll_timeout_atomic(op, addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
({ \
ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \
unsigned long __delay_us = (delay_us); \
ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \
for (;;) { \
(val) = op(addr); \
if (cond) \
break; \
if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
if (__timeout_us && \
ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \
(val) = op(addr); \
break; \
} \
if (delay_us) \
udelay(delay_us); \
if (__delay_us) \
udelay(__delay_us); \
} \
(cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \
})